The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions
Open accessAbstract
The concept of a circular economy (CE) has become popular and important issue in environmental management in recent years; however, there are not particular indicators dedicated to it in regional policy. CE approach is an industrial system that is restorative by design, and it emphasises that it is important that, rather than extracting natural resources, the materials that have already been taken can and should be recovered and reused in different ways, thereby securing natural resources from over-exploitation. In order to meet CE assumptions, modern and innovative technologies that allow for the recovery of valuable materials should be developed. This also applies to eco-innovation that connects technology development with environmental aspects. It is therefore obvious that issues of CE and eco-innovation are linked, and a uniform methodology aimed at compare the levels of moving to CE including eco-innovation solutions should be established. Because the focus in European Union (EU) has been paid on regions, measuring of CE–eco-innovations levels is especially important at the regional level. In this paper, the proposals of CE indicators, based on eco-innovation factors, which can be possible to create based on existing data set (Eurostat, Cohesion policy) are presented. It is recommend to use of five group indicators for measuring regional CE–eco-innovation. Based on Eco-Innovation Scoreboard which describes innovation measurement, three of proposed indicator groups are associated directly with innovations, taking into account the principles of CE: CE–eco-innovation inputs, CE–eco-innovation activities and CE–eco-innovation outputs, and other two groups of indicators are effects of the CE–eco-innovation introduction: resource efficiency outcomes and socio-economic outcomes. This way of measuring CE–eco-innovation allows for create holistic, systematic and integrated approach for the CE concept at the regional level. Proposed indicators can be used in current transition stage for assessment of implementation regional policy and as a base for creation final CE indicators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0914 · Cited by 3,829
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328
The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth
Boulding, K. E. (2003) · Cited by 1,291
Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda
Gassmann, O. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x · Cited by 995
Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy
Cesari, G. S., & Jarrett, H. (1967) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3102137 · Cited by 897
Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., Henclik, A., Gorazda, K., & Wzorek, Z. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051 · Cited by 487
Self-citationIndicators of sustainable production
Krajnc, D., & Glavic, P. (2003) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-003-0221-z · Cited by 243
The conversion technology of fly ash into zeolites
Wdowin, M., Franus, M., Panek, R., Badura, L., & Franus, W. (2014) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0719-6 · Cited by 224
Surface irrigation simulation models: a review
Valipour, M., Sefidkouhi, M. A. G., & Eslamian, S. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology · doi:10.1504/ijhst.2015.069279 · Cited by 188
Policy Strategies to Promote Eco‐Innovation: An Integrated Framework
del Río, P., Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J., & Könnölä, T. (2010) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00259.x · Cited by 188
Cited by
A taxonomy of circular economy indicators
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014 · Cited by 1,093
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Bryde, D. J., & Singh, R. K. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.011 · Cited by 375
An analysis of design strategies for circular economy through life cycle assessment
Spreafico, C. (2022) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-022-09803-1 · Cited by 79
Kiefer, C. P., del Río, P., & Carrillo‐Hermosilla, J. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2688 · Cited by 78
Comprehensiveness of circular economy assessments of regions: a systematic review at the macro-level
Van Bueren, B. J. A., Iyer-Raniga, U., Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Argus, K. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac209c · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., & Avdiushchenko, A.
- Venue
- Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
- Published
- 2017-01-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 669-678
- ISSN
- 1618-954X (ISSN-L)
- 1618-9558
- OpenAlex
- W2568713864
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 43.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10098-016-1323-8
- The paper
- Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., & Avdiushchenko, A. (2017). Circular economy indicators in relation to eco-innovation in European regions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1323-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.