The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory
Open accessAbstract
We propose a technique that we call HodgeRank for ranking data that may be incomplete and imbalanced, characteristics common in modern datasets coming from e-commerce and internet applications. We are primarily interested in cardinal data based on scores or ratings though our methods also give specific insights on ordinal data. From raw ranking data, we construct pairwise rankings, represented as edge flows on an appropriate graph. Our statistical ranking method exploits the graph Helmholtzian, which is the graph theoretic analogue of the Helmholtz operator or vector Laplacian, in much the same way the graph Laplacian is an analogue of the Laplace operator or scalar Laplacian. We shall study the graph Helmholtzian using combinatorial Hodge theory, which provides a way to unravel ranking information from edge flows. In particular, we show that every edge flow representing pairwise ranking can be resolved into two orthogonal components, a gradient flow that represents the l 2-optimal global ranking and a divergence-free flow (cyclic) that measures the validity of the global ranking obtained—if this is large, then it indicates that the data does not have a good global ranking. This divergence-free flow can be further decomposed orthogonally into a curl flow (locally cyclic) and a harmonic flow (locally acyclic but globally cyclic); these provides information on whether inconsistency in the ranking data arises locally or globally. When applied to statistical ranking problems, Hodge decomposition sheds light on whether a given dataset may be globally ranked in a meaningful way or if the data is inherently inconsistent and thus could not have any reasonable global ranking; in the latter case it provides information on the nature of the inconsistencies. An obvious advantage over the NP-hardness of Kemeny optimization is that HodgeRank may be easily computed via a linear least squares regression. We also discuss connections with well-known ordinal ranking techniques such as Kemeny optimization and Borda count from social choice theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons
Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334029 · Cited by 2,412
The method of paired comparisons for social values.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0065439 · Cited by 467
A geometric examination of Kemeny's rule
Saari, D. G., & Merlin, V. R. (2000) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s003550050171 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality
Ghadiyaram, D., & Bovik, A. C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2500021 · Cited by 782
Fine-Grained Visual Comparisons with Local Learning
Yu, A., & Grauman, K. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.32 · Cited by 454
What are higher-order networks?
Bick, C., Gross, E., Harrington, H. A., & Schaub, M. T. (2023) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/21m1414024 · Cited by 420
Crowdsourced Data Management: A Survey
Li, G., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., & Franklin, M. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2016.2535242 · Cited by 283
Open-ended Learning in Symmetric Zero-sum Games
Balduzzi, D., Garnelo, M., Bachrach, Y., Czarnecki, W. M., Perolat, J., Jaderberg, M., & Graepel, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08106 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, X., Lim, L.-H., Yao, Y., & Ye, Y.
- Venue
- Mathematical Programming
- Published
- 2010-11-28
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-244
- ISSN
- 0025-5610 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-4646
- OpenAlex
- W2130406232
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 35.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10107-010-0419-x
- The paper
- Jiang, X., Lim, L.-H., Yao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2011). Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory. Mathematical Programming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-010-0419-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.