The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 20,105
Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 14,874
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203720967 · Cited by 7,222
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Krosnick, J. A. (1991) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350050305 · Cited by 2,460
Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales.
Dl, W., & Cm, B. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 1,775
A manual for repertory grid technique
Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (1977) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 1,574
Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology
Coolican, H., & Coolican, H. (2017) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203769836 · Cited by 1,174
Research methods in psychology
Eccleston, C. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(95)00555-2 · Cited by 726
Greig, A., Taylor, J., & MacKay, T. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209045 · Cited by 601
Cited by
Evaluating the Impact of Physical Activity Apps and Wearables: Interdisciplinary Review
McCallum, C., Rooksby, J., & Gray, C. M. (2018) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.9054 · Cited by 126
Garcia-Sanjuan, F., Jurdi, S., Jaen, J., & Nacher, V. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.011 · Cited by 78
Mavrikis, M., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Geraniou, E., & Noss, R. (2013) · Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1007/s00779-012-0524-3 · Cited by 38
Rapti, S., Sapounidis, T., & Tselegkaridis, S. (2025) · Early Childhood Education Journal · doi:10.1007/s10643-024-01659-z · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Read, J. C.
- Venue
- Cognition, Technology & Work
- Published
- 2007-05-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-128
- ISSN
- 1435-5558 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5566
- OpenAlex
- W2062349080
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 10.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10111-007-0069-9
- The paper
- Read, J. C. (2008). Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology. Cognition, Technology & Work. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0069-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
