Cited by 276Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Building Design and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy

Esa, Mohd Reza, Halog, Anthony, Rigamonti, Lucia·2017·Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ping TS, Omran A, Pakir AHK (2009) Material waste in the malaysian construction industry. In: The International Conference on Economics and Administration, Faculty of Administration and Business
  2. Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2000) Construction material waste source evaluation. In: Proceedings: Strategies for a Sustainable Built Environment, Pretoria, pp 23–25
  3. Preston F (2012) A global redesign? shaping the circular economy. Energy environment and resource governance. Chatham House, London
  4. Zhu DJ, Huang XF (2005) Building up a model for circular economy based on object, main body, and policy. Naikai Acad J 4:86–93
  5. Department of Statistics (2015) Quarterly construction statistics 2015. Department of Statistics, Editor. Malaysia
  6. Abdullah S, Abdul Razak A, Bakar A, Hassan A, Sarrazin I (2009) Towards producing best practice in the Malaysian construction industry: The Barriers in implementing the lean construction approach. In: International Conference of Construction Industry, 30 July 2009–1 August 2009. Padang, Indonesia
  7. CIDB (2003) IBS roadmap (2003–2010). Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), Kuala Lumpur

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–276 of 276

Metadata

Authors
Esa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Esa, Mohd Reza
Venue
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1144-1154
ISSN
  • 1438-4957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-8227
OpenAlex
W2460974938
Cited by
275
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
construction and demolition waste, circular economy, waste minimization, waste management strategy, theoretical framework, stakeholder interaction, environmental impact mitigation, Malaysia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review