Cited by 156Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Clinical outcome of a headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program and adherence to treatment recommendations in a tertiary headache center: an observational study

Open access
Gaul, Charly, van Doorn, Christina, Webering, Nadine, Dlugaj, Martha, Katsarava, Zaza, Diener, Hans-Christoph, Fritsche, Günther·2011·The Journal of Headache and Pain

Abstract

This study investigated the outcome of a 5-day headache-specific multidisciplinary treatment program (MTP) and the adherence to treatment recommendations in 295 prospectively recruited consecutive headache patients [210 migraine, 17 tension-type headache (TTH), 68 combination headache, including 56 medication-overuse headache (MOH)]. Headache frequency decreased from 13.4 (±8.8) to 8.8 (±8.0) days per month after 12-18 months. Forty-three percent of the participants fulfilled the primary outcome (reduction of headache frequency of ≥50%), which was less likely in patients with combination of migraine and TTH compared to migraine (OR = 3.136, p = 0.002) or TTH (OR = 1.029, n.s.). Increasing number of headache days per month (OR = 1.092, p ≤ 0.0001) and adherence to lifestyle modifications (OR = 1.269, p = 0.004) predicted primary outcome. 51 of 56 MOH patients were treated successfully. Thirty-five percent of the patients were adherent to pharmacological prophylaxis, 61% to relaxation therapy, and 72% to aerobic endurance sports. MTP is effective in headache treatment. Adherence to therapy was associated with better outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10194-011-0348-y

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A person-centered approach that integrates various intervention components is more effective and may enhance personal control and efficacy in headache management.

    “A person-centered approach that integrates various intervention components is more effective [28,29] and may enhance personal control and efficacy in headache management [14].”

    From Development and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Chatbot Coach to Facilitate a Balanced Lifestyle in Individuals With Headaches (BalanceUP App): Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion says the program focused on self-efficacy and that patients learned to manage headaches more effectively. It also associates adherence to combined behavioral, exercise, and relaxation recommendations with better outcomes. But the Conclusion says a controlled trial is needed to establish effectiveness, so the unqualified claim that the integrated approach is more effective goes beyond this observational study. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaul, C., van Doorn, C., Webering, N., Dlugaj, M., Katsarava, Z., Diener, H.-C., & Fritsche, G.
Affiliations
Essen University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Gaul, Charly
Venue
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2011-05-05
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
475-483
ISSN
  • 1129-2369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1129-2377
OpenAlex
W2017444456
Cited by
156
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Headache and Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
migraine, tension-type headache, medication overuse headache, medication adherence, headache frequency, lifestyle modification, pharmacological prophylaxis, relaxation training, headache centers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Relaxation Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Clinics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review