The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using contemporary products and interfaces is generally less intuitive for older people than for younger counterparts, as evident by longer task times and more erroneous results.
“Using contemporary products and interfaces is generally less intuitive for older people than for their younger counterparts, as evident by longer task times and more erroneous results (Langdon et al., 2007).”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Langdon et al., 2007
Prior experience enabled people to use cars and microwaves more quickly and with fewer errors.
“Similarly, it was shown that prior experience also enabled people to use cars (Langdon et al., 2007) and microwaves (Lewis et al., 2008) more quickly and with fewer errors.”
From Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults (2015) · cites this paper as Langdon et al., 2007
Cites
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · see citing works
Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory.
Gugerty, L. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.3.1.42 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Blocking Learner Error States in a Training-Wheels System
Carroll, J. M., & Carrithers, C. (1984) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088402600402 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Older adults’ use of mobile device: usability challenges while navigating various interfaces
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2020) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1622786 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation
Persad, U., Langdon, P., & Clarkson, J. (2007) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-007-0083-y · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationO'brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/2141943.2141947 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Intuitive Learnability of Touch Gestures for Technology-Naive Older Adults
Mihajlov, M., Law, E. L.-C., & Springett, M. (2015) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu044 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050540 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langdon, P., Lewis, T., & Clarkson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Langdon, Patrick
- Venue
- Universal Access in the Information Society
- Published
- 2007-08-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-191
- ISSN
- 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5297
- OpenAlex
- W2092762576
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 17.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Cambridge
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E001777/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- prior experience, elderly users, technology generation, cognitive ability, everyday products, user interface design, verbal protocols, trial and error, age-related decline, digital cameras, inclusive design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
