CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of formative assessment in an augmented reality approach to conducting ubiquitous learning activities for architecture courses

Chu, Hui-Chun, Chen, Jun-Ming, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Chen, Tsung-Wen·2019·Universal Access in the Information Society
DOI 10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Afolabi, A., Adagunodo, E.R.: Application of fingerprint security technique in UBIQUITOUS learning system. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 3(2), 2333–2336 (2014)
  2. Bell, B., Cowie, B.: The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Sci. Educ. 85(5), 536–553 (2001) · DOI
  3. Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., Sese, F.J.: Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Comput. Educ. 62, 102–110 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bloch, J.: Rousseauism and Education in Eighteen-Century France. Voltaire Foundation, Oxford (1995)
  5. Burleson, W.: Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 63(3), 436–451 (2005) · DOI
  6. Chen, C.C., Huang, T.C.: Learning in a u-Museum: developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Comput. Educ. 59(3), 843–883 (2012) · DOI
  7. Chen, C.C., Lin, P.H.: Development and evaluation of a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for astronomy education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(3), 644–661 (2016) · DOI
  8. Chen, C.H., Liu, G.Z., Hwang, G.J.: Interaction between gaming and multistage guiding strategies on students’ field trip mobile learning performance and motivation. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(6), 1032–1050 (2015) · DOI
  9. Chen, C.H., Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.H.: A progressive prompting approach to conducting context-aware learning activities for natural science courses. Interact. Comput. 26(4), 348–359 (2014) · DOI
  10. Chu, H.C., Chen, J.M., Yang, K.H., Lin, C.W.: Development and application of a repertory grid-oriented knowledge construction augmented reality learning system for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 10(1–2), 40–60 (2016) · DOI
  11. Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.C., Tseng, J.C.: A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1618–1627 (2010) · DOI
  12. Crisp, R.J., Stathi, S., Turner, R.N., Husnu, S.: Imagined intergroup contact: theory, paradigm, and practice. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2, 1–8 (2008) · DOI
  13. Derry, S.J., Lajoie, S.P.: A middle camp for (Un) intelligent instructional computing: an introduction. In: Computers as Cognitive Tools, vol. 1. Routledge, New York, London (2013)
  14. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M.B., Kloos, C.D.: Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 586–596 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C.: Augmented reality teaching and learning. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 735–745 (2014) · DOI
  16. Furió, D., Gonzalez-Gancedo, S., Juan, M., Seguí, I., Rando, N.: Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game. Comput. Educ. 64, 1–23 (2013) · DOI
  17. Genc, E.: Development and validation of an instrument to evaluate science teachers’ assessment beliefs and practices. Doctoral dissertation, College of Education, Florida State University (2005)
  18. Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D., Davis, N.E.: Online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Comput. Educ. 57, 2333–2351 (2011) · DOI
  19. Gipps, C.: Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. Falmer Press, London (1994)
  20. Hooshyar, D., Ahmad, R.B., Yousefi, M., Yusop, F.D., Horng, S.J.: Applying an online game-based formative assessment in a flowchart-based intelligent tutoring system for improving problem-solving skills. Comput. Educ. 94, 8–36 (2015)
  21. Hosking, J.G., Floresco, S.B., Winstanley, C.A.: Dopamine antagonism decreases willingness to expend physical, but not cognitive, effort: a comparison of two rodent cost/benefit decision-making tasks. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(4), 1005–1015 (2015) · DOI
  22. Hsiao, H.S., Chang, C.S., Lin, C.Y., Wang, Y.Z.: Weather observers: a manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(1), 205–223 (2016) · DOI
  23. Huk, T., Ludwigs, S.: Combining cognitive and affective support in order to promote learning. Learn. Instr. 19, 495–505 (2009) · DOI
  24. Hwang, G.J.: Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learn. Environ. 1(1), 1 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hwang, G.J., Chang, H.F.: A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 1023–1031 (2011) · DOI
  26. Hwang, G.J., Chang, S.C.: Effects of a peer competition-based mobile learning approach on students’ affective domain exhibition in social studies courses. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47(6), 1217–1231 (2015) · DOI
  27. Hwang, G.J., Chen, C.H.: Influences of an inquiry-based ubiquitous gaming design on students’ learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 48(4), 950–971 (2017) · DOI
  28. Hwang, G.J., Shih, J.L. Experiences of using a blended mobile learning approach to connect classroom and in-field learning activities in a local culture course. In: Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity, pp 319–333 (2015) · DOI
  29. Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.C., Chu, H.C., Kinshuk, K., Chen, C.Y.: A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 28(5), 931–947 (2012) · DOI
  30. Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.C., Yang, S.J.H.: Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11(2), 81–91 (2008)
  31. Hwang, G.J., Wu, P.H., Chen, C.C., Tu, N.T.: Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interact. Learn. Environ. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747 · DOI
  32. Hwang, G.J., Yang, L.H., Wang, S.Y.: A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 69, 121–130 (2013) · DOI
  33. Khan, K.S., Davies, D.A., Gupta, J.K.: Formative self-assessment using multiple true-false questions on the Internet: feedback according to confidence about correct knowledge. Med. Teach. 23(2), 158–163 (2001) · DOI
  34. Li, L., Liu, X., Steckelberg, A.L.: Assessor or assessee: how student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(3), 525–536 (2010) · DOI
  35. Lin, J.W., Lai, Y.C.: Harnessing Collaborative Annotations on Online Formative Assessments. Educ Technol Soc 16(1), 263–274 (2013)
  36. Liu, T.Y., Chu, Y.L.: Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 630–643 (2010) · DOI
  37. Maier, U., Wolf, N., Randler, C.: Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Comput. Educ. 95, 85–98 (2016) · DOI
  38. McMahon, D.D., Cihak, D.F., Wright, R.E., Bell, S.M.: Augmented reality for teaching science vocabulary to postsecondary education students with intellectual disabilities and autism. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 48(1), 38–56 (2016) · DOI
  39. Narciss, S., Huth, K.: Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learn. Instr. 16(4), 310–322 (2006) · DOI
  40. Ng, E.M.: Fostering pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learning through self-and peer assessment of wiki projects. Comput. Educ. 98, 180–191 (2016) · DOI
  41. Ng, M.W.E.: Using a mixed research method to evaluate the effectiveness of formative assessment in supporting student teachers’ wiki authoring. Comput. Educ. 73, 141–148 (2014) · DOI
  42. Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G.J., Triampo, W., Shih, B.Y.: A multi-expert approach for developing testing and diagnostic systems based on the concept effect model. Comput. Educ. 55, 527–540 (2010) · DOI
  43. Perrenoud, P.: From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assess. Educ. 5, 85–102 (1998) · DOI
  44. Pintrich, R.R., DeGroot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Educ. Psychol. 82(1), 33–40 (1990) · DOI · Paper page
  45. Puente, S.M.G., van Eijck, M., Jochems, W.: A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 23(3), 717–732 (2013) · DOI
  46. Rodrigues, F., Oliveira, P.: A system for formative assessment and monitoring of students’ progress. Comput. Educ. 76, 30–41 (2014) · DOI
  47. Sung, H.Y., Hwang, G.J., Liu, S.Y., Chiu, I.H.: A prompt-based annotation approach to conducting mobile learning activities for architecture design courses. Comput. Educ. 76, 80–90 (2014) · DOI
  48. Sung, H.Y., Hwang, G.J., Yen, Y.F.: Development of a contextual decision-making game for improving students’ learning performance in a health education course. Comput. Educ. 82, 179–190 (2015) · DOI
  49. van der Kleij, F.M., Timmers, C.F., Eggen, T.J.: The effectiveness of methods for providing written feedback through a computer-based assessment for learning: a systematic review. Cadmo 19, 21–39 (2011) · DOI
  50. van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, B.A.M., Admiraal, W.F., Simons, P.R.J.: The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Comput. Educ. 51(4), 1804–1817 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  51. Wang, S.L., Chen, C.C., Zhang, Z.G.: A context-aware knowledge map to support ubiquitous learning activities for a u-Botanical museum. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 31, 4 (2015) · DOI
  52. Wang, T.H.: Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation. Comput. Educ. 51(3), 1247–1263 (2008) · DOI
  53. Wang, T.H.: Developing Web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-Learning environment. Comput. Educ. 57(2), 1801–1812 (2011) · DOI
  54. Wang, T.H.: Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Comput. Educ. 73, 189–203 (2014) · DOI
  55. Wang, T.H., Wang, K.H., Wang, W.L., Huang, S.C., Chen, S.Y.: Web-based assessment and test analyses (WATA) system: development and evaluation. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 20(1), 59–71 (2004) · DOI
  56. Wolff, M., Wagner, M.J., Poznanski, S., Schiller, J., Santen, S.: Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. J. Emerg. Med. 48(1), 85–93 (2015) · DOI
  57. Wolff, M.J., Scholz, S., Akyürek, E.G., van Rijn, H.: Two visual targets for the price of one? Pupil dilation shows reduced mental effort through temporal integration. Psychon. B Rev. 22(1), 251–257 (2015) · DOI
  58. Wu, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Milrad, M., Ke, H.R., Huang, Y.M.: An innovative concept map approach for improving students’ learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43(2), 217–232 (2012) · DOI
  59. Wu, P.H., Hwang, G.J., Su, L.H., Huang, Y.M.: A context-aware mobile learning system for supporting cognitive apprenticeships in nursing skills training. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(1), 223–236 (2012)
  60. Yilmaz, R.M.: Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 240–248 (2016) · DOI
  61. Yin, P.Y., Chuang, K.H., Hwang, G.J.: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning system based on a hyper-heuristic approach by taking real-world constraints into account. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0390-z · DOI
  62. Zarraonandia, T., Aedo, I., Díaz, P., Montero, A.: An augmented lecture feedback system to support learner and teacher communication. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 44(4), 616–628 (2013) · DOI
  63. Zimmerman, B.J., Labuhn, A.S. Self-regulation of learning: process approaches to personal development. In: Harris, K.R., Graham, S., Urdan, T. (eds.) The Educational Psychology Handbook, vol. 1. Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues, pp. 399–425. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2012) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Chu, H.-C., Chen, J.-M., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, T.-W.
Venue
Universal Access in the Information Society
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
221-230
ISSN
  • 1615-5289
  • 1615-5297
DOI
10.1007/s10209-017-0588-y
Cited by
53
References
7
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review