The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Van der Pol et al.'s second study showed that students agreed more with the feedback that they perceived as useful.
“the second study showed that students agreed more with the feedback that they perceived as useful”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Van der Pol et al. (2008)
Van der Pol et al.'s first study found that a higher perceived importance of feedback on their work by students corresponded with more revisions in their written work.
“Their first study found that a higher perceived importance of feedback on their work by students corresponded with more revisions in their written work”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Van der Pol et al. (2008)
Student's agreement with the feedback, and not perceived feedback usefulness, correlated with higher rate of revision.
“Student's agreement with the feedback, and not perceived feedback usefulness, correlated with higher rate of revision.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Van der Pol et al. (2008)
Van der Pol et al. (2008) found that the more students agreed with the feedback, the more useful they would grade it.
“Similarly, Van der Pol et al. (2008) found that the more students agreed with the feedback, the more useful they would grade it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Van der Pol et al. (2008)
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846 · see citing works
Informal learning in the workplace
Eraut *, M. (2004) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/158037042000225245 · Cited by 2,611 · see citing works
Analyzing media messages using quantitative content analysis in research
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. R., Watson, B. R., & Fico, F. G. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9780429464287 · Cited by 2,236 · see citing works
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173 · see citing works
Topping, K. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005) · Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis
Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. J. (1989) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543059004395 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision
Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/357381 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/713611428 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
Topping, K. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work
Billett, S. R. (2002) · Studies in the Education of Adults · doi:10.1080/02660830.2002.11661461 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
PRODUCT COMPARISONS AND PROCESS BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE PEER GROUP AND SELF ASSESSMENTS
Falchikov, N. (1986) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293860110206 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment
Orsmond, P., Merry, S. P., & Reiling, K. (1996) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293960210304 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Building a Web-Based Education System
McCormack, C., & Jones, D. J. (1997) · Cited by 273 · see citing works
The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course
Tuzi, F. (2004) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(03)00074-0 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances, Functions, and Content
Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education
van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600680836 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationNegotiation of Meaning and Noticing in Text‐Based Online Chat
SHEKARY, M., & Tahririan, M. H. (2006) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.x · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments
Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., & Hoppe, U. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses
Gehringer, E. F. (2001) · doi:10.1145/364447.364564 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Martel, A., & Mavrommati, I. (2001) · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback
van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510500527685 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationThe affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts
van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9657-6 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationHewett, B. L. (2000) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(00)00035-9 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Sadler, R. (2004) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction
Saunders, W. M. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90019-0 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study
Bhalerao, A. H., & Ward, A. (2001) · ALT-J · doi:10.1080/09687760108656773 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Building a Web-based Education System
Sutton, S. A. (1999) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr.1999.17209caf.006 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Task-Based Team Learning with ICT, Design and Development of New Learning
van Weert, T. J., & Pilot, A. (2003) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1023/a:1024562515675 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Towards a flexible peer assessment system
Trahasch, S. (2004) · doi:10.1109/ithet.2004.1358227 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Comparison of E-Response: Two Experiences; One Conclusion
Tannacito, T. L. (2002) · UC Santa Barbara · doi:10.7940/m37.3.coverweb.tannacito-et-al · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing Instruction: Boon or Bane?.
Jacobs, G. M., & Zhang, S. (1989) · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Using web-based peer assessment in fostering deep learning in computer programming
Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. S. (2004) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · Cited by 5 · see citing works
From Lecture Recording Towards Personalized Collaborative Learning
Fiehn, T., Lauer, T., Lienhard, J. H., et al. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_56 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Leren Communiceren; Handboek voor mondelinge en schriftelijke communicatie (Vijfde, herziene druk)
Steehouder, M., Jansen, C. J. M., Maat, K., et al. (2006) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Evans, C. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312474350 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Self-citationGuo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Lin, G.-Y. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10030060 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments
Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2015.1058853 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education
Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100588 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Prospective mathematics teachers’ development of noticing in an online teacher education program
Fernández, C., Llinares, S., & Rojas, Y. (2020) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-020-01149-7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Demiraslan Çevik, Y. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.056 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
AI assistance in peer feedback provision: Pedagogically sound, but minimally adopted
Pozdniakov, S., Brazil, J., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Gašević, D., Sadiq, S., & Khosravi, H. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105591 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- van der Pol, J., van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1804-1817
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149915933
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 33.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- online peer feedback, feedback uptake, feedback evaluation, annotation system, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review