The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marcel Faber Roundtable: Is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration?
Abstract
There are few new antibiotics in the pipeline today. The reasons may include starvation at the front of the pipeline due to inadequate sources of suitable compounds to screen coupled with poorly validated discovery methodologies. A successful antibiotic discovery approach in the past, based upon whole cell antibiotic screening of natural products from actinomycetes and fungi, eventually suffered from constipation in the middle of the pipeline due to rediscovery of known compounds, even though low throughput methodology was employed at the front end. The current lack of productivity may be attributed to the poor choice of strategies to address the discovery of new antibiotics. Recent applications of high throughput in vitro screening of individual antibacterial targets to identify lead compounds from combinatorial chemical libraries, traditional chemical libraries, and partially purified natural product extracts has not produced any significant clinical candidates. The solution to the current dilemma may be to return to natural product whole cell screening. For this approach to work in the current millennium, the process needs to be miniaturized to increase the throughput by orders of magnitude over traditional screening, and the rediscovery of known antibiotics needs to be minimized by methods that can be readily monitored and improved over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bioactive Microbial Metabolites: A Personal View
Bérdy, J. (2005) · The Journal of Antibiotics · doi:10.1038/ja.2005.1 · Cited by 3,170
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002
Newman, D. J., Cragg, G. M., & Snader, K. M. (2003) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np030096l · Cited by 3,082
Cited by
Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance
Davies, J., & Davies, D. (2010) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00016-10 · Cited by 5,784
Systems-level antimicrobial drug and drug synergy discovery
Roemer, T., & Boone, C. (2013) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1205 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Baltz, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-18
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 507-513
- ISSN
- 1367-5435 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5535
- OpenAlex
- W2072094617
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marcel Faber Roundtable: Is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10295-005-0077-9
- The paper
- Baltz, R. H. (2006). Marcel Faber Roundtable: Is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration? Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0077-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.