Cited by 20Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Diel and seasonal vocal activity patterns revealed by passive acoustic monitoring suggest expert recommendations for breeding bird surveys need adjustment

Open access
Singer, David, Kamp, Johannes, Hondong, Hermann, Schuldt, Andreas, Hagge, Jonas·2026·Journal of Ornithology

Abstract

Species identification and recording in breeding bird surveys vastly rely on the registration of avian calls and songs. Despite comprehensive expert knowledge on species-specific activity patterns, data-based analyses of vocal activity patterns are lacking. Recent advances in passive acoustic monitoring allow the direct measurement of bird vocal activity at very high temporal resolution. We conducted a comprehensive survey, recording 25,000 h of audio data at 256 forest sites in Lower Saxony, Germany, to investigate vocal activity patterns of the European forest bird community. Our results reveal a high degree of inter-specific variability in seasonal and diel vocal activity patterns, including strong circular patterns along the day–night cycle and a significant seasonal component. Comparing acoustic detectability to species-specific survey recommendations revealed critical temporal discrepancies for 64.2% of species, and standard protocols (sunrise to 4 h after sunrise) showed discrepancies for 41.5% of species. This highlights the potential for temporal survey optimization to reduce imperfect detection and increase accuracy and precision. Emphasis should be given to the hours before and after sunrise and also sunset for sampling less detectable species. Combining observer-based surveys with passive acoustic monitoring might leverage the strengths of both methods. Our results also emphasize the potential of continuous recording schedules in passive acoustic monitoring to capture diverse temporal patterns. This study provides a baseline for future research on vocal activity patterns across habitats, throughout the year, and regarding anthropogenic impacts. Our findings may raise awareness among ornithologists about the sources of variation in acoustic detectability and its implications for breeding bird surveys, highlighting potential for methodological adjustments in survey timing and consequences for carful interpretation of bird surveys.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10336-025-02307-y

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection remains inherently imperfect because species differ widely in vocal amplitude, calling behaviour, and seasonal activity, meaning some organisms present in an ecosystem may remain acoustically undetected even within dense monitoring grids.

    “Detection remains inherently imperfect, because species differ widely in vocal amplitude, calling behaviour, and seasonal activity, meaning that some organisms present in an ecosystem may remain acoustically undetected even within dense monitoring grids”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, D., Kamp, J., Hondong, H., Schuldt, A., & Hagge, J.
Affiliations
  • Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt (DE)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Singer, David
Venue
Journal of Ornithology
Published
2025-07-09
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
165-180
ISSN
  • 2193-7192 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-7206
OpenAlex
W4412176373
Cited by
20
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal für Ornithologie (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
diel activity patterns, seasonal variation, Breeding Bird Survey, passive acoustic monitoring, imperfect detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review