Cited by 204Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Social participation and survival at older ages: is the effect driven by activity content or context?

Open access
Maier, Heiner, Klumb, Petra L.·2005·European Journal of Ageing

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that time spent on social activities (i.e., in direct interaction with others) and time spent in social contexts (i.e., while others are present) is associated with survival in persons aged 70 and older. An observational study with mortality follow-ups was carried out in the former West Berlin, Germany (Berlin Aging Study). The sample was stratified by age and sex, and consisted of 473 persons aged 70 to 103 years. Social activity and social context measures were assessed in 1990-1993 by structured interviews in the participants' homes. Cox regression was used to model survival from time of interview. The main outcome measure was survival on 1 August 2003. Time spent on social activities was revealed as a predictor of survival only in analyses that did not control for confounding factors. In contrast, time spent in context "with friends" was significantly related to increased survival (relative risk=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.99) even after several confounding factors were controlled for. This study suggests that time spent with friends affords a survival advantage among older adults, above and beyond the effects of other leisure activities. Future research on social participation and survival may benefit from an examination of the interaction between activity content and social context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10433-005-0018-5

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In several reviewed studies, informal social activity or social intimacy was shown to be the variable with the greatest independent effect upon wellbeing outcomes.

    “In several of the studies, informal social activity or social intimacy was shown to be the variable with the greatest independent effect upon wellbeing outcomes (cf.Everard 1999;Litwin and Shiovitz-Ezra 2006 ;Maier and Klumb 2005;Ritchey, Ritchey and Dietz 2001;Warr, Butcher and Robertson 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maier, H., & Klumb, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Maier, Heiner
Venue
European Journal of Ageing
Published
2005-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
31-39
ISSN
  • 1613-9372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-9380
OpenAlex
W2006165641
Cited by
204
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Ageing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social participation (health and rehabilitation), survival, mortality, older adults, social activity, social environment, leisure, Berlin Aging Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review