Cited by 145Automotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Laboratory validation of two wearable sensor systems for measuring head impact severity in football players

Siegmund, Gunter P., Guskiewicz, Kevin M., Marshall, Stephen W., DeMarco, Alyssa L., Bonin, Stephanie J.·2016·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Wearable sensors can measure head impact frequency and magnitude in football players. Our goal was to quantify the impact detection rate and validity of the direction and peak kinematics of two wearable sensors: a helmet system (HITS) and a mouthguard system (X2). Using a linear impactor, modified Hybrid-III headform and one helmet model, we conducted 16 impacts for each system at 12 helmet sites and 5 speeds (3.6-11.2 m/s) (N = 896 tests). Peak linear and angular accelerations (PLA, PAA), head injury criteria (HIC) and impact directions from each device were compared to reference sensors in the headform. Both sensors detected ~96% of impacts. Median angular errors for impact directions were 34° for HITS and 16° for X2. PLA, PAA and HIC were simultaneously valid at 2 sites for HITS (side, oblique) and one site for X2 (side). At least one kinematic parameter was valid at 2 and 7 other sites for HITS and X2 respectively. Median relative errors for PLA were 7% for HITS and -7% for X2. Although sensor validity may differ for other helmets and headforms, our analyses show that data generated by these two sensors need careful interpretation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10439-015-1420-6

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegmund, G. P., Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., DeMarco, A. L., & Bonin, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Siegmund, Gunter P.
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2015-08-13
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1257-1274
ISSN
  • 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9686
OpenAlex
W1193367861
Cited by
145
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Football League (Contract)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
wearable sensors, head impact detection, football players, sports-related head injury, impact direction, peak linear acceleration, head injury criterion, Hybrid III headform, sensor validation, impact kinematics
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Biomechanical Phenomena, Football, Craniocerebral Trauma, Head Protective Devices, Humans, Laboratories, Mouth Protectors, Telemetry, Reproducibility of Results, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review