Cited by 5Bone fractures and treatmentsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyBone Tissue Engineering Materials

An In Silico Model to Examine the Interaction Between Implant Degradation and Fracture Healing Under Mechanical Loading

Fu, Ruisen, Zhao, Xurun, Liu, Yang, Qiao, Aike, Yang, Haisheng·2025·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Biodegradable implants are promising for fracture fixation but they have not been applied to the load-bearing skeletal sites. A critical issue is how implant degradation and fracture healing affect each other under mechanical loading. To address this issue, we first developed a finite element model of a long bone fracture fixed with a Zn alloy-based screw-plate system, where implant degradation and bone healing were simulated based upon the continuum damage mechanics and mechano-regulated tissue differentiation algorithm, respectively. For comparison, non-degradable Ti alloy implant with normal bone healing and non-healing fracture with normal implant degradation were served as two reference controls. In terms of the effect of implant degradation on bone healing, the results indicated that implant degradation resulted in a greater volume of newly formed bone within the callus (16% for the degradable implant vs 12% for the non-degradable implant) and a better biomechanical recovery of the fractured bone (bone stiffness fraction: 107% vs 95%) at week 8. Regarding the effect of bone healing on implant degradation, fracture healing led to a significant decrease in the degradation rate of the implant (implant stiffness fraction at week 4: 8% for non-healing vs 40% for healing) and an increase in the overall period from 4 to 8 weeks for a complete degradation of the implant. These results together suggest that implant degradation and fracture healing significantly affect each other under mechanical loading. The in silico model developed here may provide a valuable platform to consider interactions between material degradation and bone healing when designing biodegradable implants for orthopaedic internal fixation at the load-bearing sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10439-025-03741-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An optimal biodegradable implant should degrade substantially only after fulfilling its mechanical role during fracture healing, necessitating a degradation rate that aligns with the bone healing process.

    “Actually, an optimal biodegradable implant should degrade substantially only after fulfilling its mechanical role during the fracture healing period, necessitating a degradation rate that aligns with the bone healing process42–44.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, R., Zhao, X., Liu, Y., Qiao, A., & Yang, H.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Haisheng
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-05-15
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
1919-1930
ISSN
  • 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9686
OpenAlex
W4410401417
Cited by
4
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12272017)
  • Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L232058)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
biodegradable implants, implant degradation, fracture healing, mechanical loading, finite element model, continuum damage mechanics, callus formation, bone stiffness
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Stress, Mechanical, Weight-Bearing, Fracture Healing, Absorbable Implants, Finite Element Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review