Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays

Open access
Nowak-Sliwinska, Patrycja, Alitalo, Kari, Allen, Elizabeth, Anisimov, Andrey, Aplin, Alfred C., Auerbach, Robert, Augustin, Hellmut G., Bates, David O., van Beijnum, Judy R., Bender, R. Hugh F., Bergers, Gabriele, Bikfalvi, Andreas, Bischoff, Joyce, Böck, Barbara C., Brooks, Peter C., Bussolino, Federico, Cakir, Bertan, Carmeliet, Peter, Castranova, Daniel, Cimpean, Anca M., Cleaver, Ondine, Coukos, George, Davis, George E., De Palma, Michele, Dimberg, Anna, Dings, Ruud P. M., Djonov, Valentin, Dudley, Andrew C., Dufton, Neil P., Fendt, Sarah-Maria, Ferrara, Napoleone, Fruttiger, Marcus, Fukumura, Dai, Ghesquière, Bart, Gong, Yan, Griffin, Robert J., Harris, Adrian L., Hughes, Christopher C. W., Hultgren, Nan W., Iruela-Arispe, M. Luisa, Irving, Melita, Jain, Rakesh K., Kalluri, Raghu, Kalucka, Joanna, Kerbel, Robert S., Kitajewski, Jan, Klaassen, Ingeborg, Kleinmann, Hynda K., Koolwijk, Pieter, Kuczynski, Elisabeth, Kwak, Brenda R., Marien, Koen, Melero-Martin, Juan M., Munn, Lance L., Nicosia, Roberto F., Noel, Agnes, Nurro, Jussi, Olsson, Anna-Karin, Petrova, Tatiana V., Pietras, Kristian, Pili, Roberto, Pollard, Jeffrey W., Post, Mark J., Quax, Paul H. A., Rabinovich, Gabriel A., Raica, Marius, Randi, Anna M., Ribatti, Domenico, Ruegg, Curzio, Schlingemann, Reinier O., Schulte-Merker, Stefan, Smith, Lois E. H., Song, Jonathan W., Stacker, Steven A., Stalin, Jimmy, Stratman, Amber N., Van de Velde, Maureen, van Hinsbergh, Victor W. M., Vermeulen, Peter B., Waltenberger, Johannes, Weinstein, Brant M., Xin, Hong, Yetkin-Arik, Bahar, Yla-Herttuala, Seppo, Yoder, Mervin C., Griffioen, Arjan W.·2018·Angiogenesis

Abstract

AbstractThe formation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis, is a complex process that plays important roles in growth and development, tissue and organ regeneration, as well as numerous pathological conditions. Angiogenesis undergoes multiple discrete steps that can be individually evaluated and quantified by a large number of bioassays. These independent assessments hold advantages but also have limitations. This article describes in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro bioassays that are available for the evaluation of angiogenesis and highlights critical aspects that are relevant for their execution and proper interpretation. As such, this collaborative work is the first edition of consensus guidelines on angiogenesis bioassays to serve for current and future reference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10456-018-9613-x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Nowak-Sliwinska, P., Alitalo, K., Allen, E., Anisimov, A., Aplin, A. C., Auerbach, R., Augustin, H. G., Bates, D. O., van Beijnum, J. R., Bender, R. H. F., Bergers, G., Bikfalvi, A., Bischoff, J., Böck, B. C., Brooks, P. C., Bussolino, F., Cakir, B., Carmeliet, P., Castranova, D., Cimpean, A. M., Cleaver, O., Coukos, G., Davis, G. E., De Palma, M., Dimberg, A., Dings, R. P. M., Djonov, V., Dudley, A. C., Dufton, N. P., Fendt, S.-M., Ferrara, N., Fruttiger, M., Fukumura, D., Ghesquière, B., Gong, Y., Griffin, R. J., Harris, A. L., Hughes, C. C. W., Hultgren, N. W., Iruela-Arispe, M. L., Irving, M., Jain, R. K., Kalluri, R., Kalucka, J., Kerbel, R. S., Kitajewski, J., Klaassen, I., Kleinmann, H. K., Koolwijk, P., Kuczynski, E., Kwak, B. R., Marien, K., Melero-Martin, J. M., Munn, L. L., Nicosia, R. F., Noel, A., Nurro, J., Olsson, A.-K., Petrova, T. V., Pietras, K., Pili, R., Pollard, J. W., Post, M. J., Quax, P. H. A., Rabinovich, G. A., Raica, M., Randi, A. M., Ribatti, D., Ruegg, C., Schlingemann, R. O., Schulte-Merker, S., Smith, L. E. H., Song, J. W., Stacker, S. A., Stalin, J., Stratman, A. N., Van de Velde, M., van Hinsbergh, V. W. M., Vermeulen, P. B., Waltenberger, J., Weinstein, B. M., Xin, H., Yetkin-Arik, B., Yla-Herttuala, S., Yoder, M. C., & Griffioen, A. W.
Venue
Angiogenesis
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
425-532
ISSN
  • 0969-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7209
OpenAlex
W2803326208
Cited by
590
References
54
FWCI
21.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10456-018-9613-x
The paper
Nowak-Sliwinska, P., Alitalo, K., Allen, E., Anisimov, A., Aplin, A. C., Auerbach, R., Augustin, H. G., Bates, D. O., van Beijnum, J. R., Bender, R. H. F., Bergers, G., Bikfalvi, A., Bischoff, J., Böck, B. C., Brooks, P. C., Bussolino, F., Cakir, B., Carmeliet, P., Castranova, D., . . . Griffioen, A. W. (2018). Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays. Angiogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-018-9613-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.