Cited by 184Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsICT in Developing Communities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of a mHealth Intervention for Peer Health Workers on AIDS Care in Rural Uganda: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Cluster-Randomized Trial

Open access

Abstract

Mobile phone access in low and middle-income countries is rapidly expanding and offers an opportunity to leverage limited human resources for health. We conducted a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster-randomized trial exploratory substudy on the impact of a mHealth (mobile phone) support intervention used by community-based peer health workers (PHW) on AIDS care in rural Uganda. 29 PHWs at 10 clinics were randomized by clinic to receive the intervention or not. PHWs used phones to call and text higher level providers with patient-specific clinical information. 970 patients cared for by the PHWs were followed over a 26 month period. No significant differences were found in patients' risk of virologic failure. Qualitative analyses found improvements in patient care and logistics and broad support for the mHealth intervention among patients, clinic staff, and PHWs. Key challenges identified included variable patient phone access, privacy concerns, and phone maintenance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-011-9995-x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. World Health Organization. Towards universal access: scaling up priority HIV/AIDS interventions in the health sector: progress report 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  2. World Health Organization. Global recommendations and guidelines on task shifting. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  3. Reynolds SJ, Kagaayi J, Nakigozi G, Makumbi F, Opendi P, Nakamya P, Gray R, Wawer M, Quinn TC, Lutalo T, Serwadda D. Early immunologic and virologic responses to ART in rural Rakai, Uganda [Abstract THPE0181].Toronto: XVI International AIDS Conference; 2006.
  4. Boguszewska S. Communications markets in Uganda. Cambridge: Pyramid Research, Inc.; 2009.
  5. Mechael P, Batavia H, Kaonga N, Searle S, Kwan A, Goldberger A, Fu L, Ossman J. Barriers and gaps affecting mhealth in low and middle income countries: policy white paper. New York: Center for Global Health and Economic Development Earth Institute, Columbia University; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chang, L. W., Kagaayi, J., Arem, H., Nakigozi, G., Ssempijja, V., Serwadda, D., Quinn, T. C., Gray, R. H., Bollinger, R. C., & Reynolds, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rakai Health Sciences Program (UG)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Larry W.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1776-1784
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W2042543641
Cited by
184
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
24.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH086338)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2T32-AI07291, T32AI007291, ZIAAI000361)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042854)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
mobile health, HIV care, mobile telephony, community health workers, virological failure, rural health care, privacy concerns, health worker support, Uganda
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Communication, Community Health Services, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Rural Population, Uganda, Cluster Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Telemedicine, Anti-HIV Agents, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review