Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 802

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HIV Stigma Mechanisms and Well-Being Among PLWH: A Test of the HIV Stigma Framework

Open access
Earnshaw, Valerie A., Smith, Laramie R., Chaudoir, Stephenie R., Amico, K. Rivet, Copenhaver, Michael M.·2013·AIDS and Behavior

Abstract

The current work evaluates the HIV Stigma Framework in a sample of 95 people living with HIV recruited from an inner-city clinic in the Bronx, NY. To determine the contributions of each HIV stigma mechanism (internalized, enacted, and anticipated) on indicators of health and well-being, we conducted an interviewer-delivered survey and abstracted data from medical records. Results suggest that internalized stigma associates significantly with indicators of affective (i.e., helplessness regarding, acceptance of, and perceived benefits of HIV) and behavioral (i.e., days in medical care gaps and ARV non-adherence) health and well-being. Enacted and anticipated stigma associate with indicators of physical health and well-being (i.e., CD4 count less than 200 and chronic illness comorbidity respectively). By differentiating between HIV stigma mechanisms, researchers may gain a more nuanced understanding of how HIV stigma impacts health and well-being and better inform targeted interventions to improve specific outcomes among people living with HIV.ResumenEl presente trabajo evalúa el Marco Teórico del Estigma hacia el VIH en una muestra de 95 personas que viven con VIH y que fueron reclutadas en una clínica del centro de la ciudad del Bronx, NY. Para determinar la contribución de cada mecanismo con el que el estigma hacia el VIH (interiorizado, percibido, y anticipado) funciona en relación a indicadores de salud y bienestar, se realizó una encuesta conducida por entrevistadores y se extrajo información de registros médicos. Los resultados sugieren que el estigma internalizado se asocia significativamente con indicadores de salud y bienestar afectivos (es decir desesperanza, aceptación del VIH y beneficios percibidos por tener VIH) y de comportamiento (es decir, días de interrupción en la atención médica y falta de adherencia a medicamentos ARV). El estigma percibido y el anticipado se asocian con indicadores de salud física y bienestar (es decir, recuento de CD4 inferior a 200 y comorbilidad con otras enfermedades crónicas, respectivamente). Al diferenciar entre mecanismos de estigmatización en relación al VIH, los investigadores pueden obtener una comprensión más matizada de cómo el estigma impacta a la salud y al bienestar y pueden utilizar esta información para informar adecuadamente el desarrollo de intervenciones dirigidas a mejorar resultados específicos entre las personas que viven con VIH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10461-013-0437-9

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 802

Metadata

Authors
Earnshaw, V. A., Smith, L. R., Chaudoir, S. R., Amico, K. R., & Copenhaver, M. M.
Venue
AIDS and Behavior
Published
2013-03-03
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1785-1795
ISSN
  • 1090-7165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3254
OpenAlex
W1991159879
Cited by
802
References
35
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HIV Stigma Mechanisms and Well-Being Among PLWH: A Test of the HIV Stigma Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10461-013-0437-9
The paper
Earnshaw, V. A., Smith, L. R., Chaudoir, S. R., Amico, K. R., & Copenhaver, M. M. (2013). HIV Stigma Mechanisms and Well-Being Among PLWH: A Test of the HIV Stigma Framework. AIDS and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0437-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.