Cited by 156HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses

‘Management of a spoiled identity’: systematic review of interventions to address self-stigma among people living with and affected by HIV

Open access
Pantelic, Marija, Steinert, Janina I, Park, Jay, Mellors, Shaun, Murau, Fungai·2019·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-stigma, also known as internalised stigma, is a global public health threat because it keeps people from accessing HIV and other health services. By hampering HIV testing, treatment and prevention, self-stigma can compromise the sustainability of health interventions and have serious epidemiological consequences. This review synthesised existing evidence of interventions aiming to reduce self-stigma experienced by people living with HIV and key populations affected by HIV in low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS: Studies were identified through bibliographic databases, grey literature sites, study registries, back referencing and contacts with researchers, and synthesised following Cochrane guidelines. RESULTS: Of 5880 potentially relevant titles, 20 studies were included in the review. Represented in these studies were 9536 people (65% women) from Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Nepal, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda and Vietnam. Seventeen of the studies recruited people living with HIV (of which five focused specifically on pregnant women). The remaining three studies focused on young men who have sex with men, female sex workers and men who inject drugs. Studies were clustered into four categories based on the socioecological level of risk or resilience that they targeted: (1) individual level only, (2) individual and relational levels, (3) individual and structural levels and (4) structural level only. Thirteen studies targeting structural risks (with or without individual components) consistently produced significant reductions in self-stigma. The remaining seven studies that did not include a component to address structural risks produced mixed effects. CONCLUSION: Structural interventions such as scale-up of antiretroviral treatment, prevention of medication stockouts, social empowerment and economic strengthening may help substantially reduce self-stigma among individuals. More research is urgently needed to understand how to reduce self-stigma among young people and key populations, as well as how to tackle intersectional self-stigma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001285

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A systematic review of internalized HIV stigma interventions for key populations and PWH found methodologically strong evidence for the effect of interventions targeting HIV stigma at both the structural and individual levels.

    “A systematic review of internalized HIV stigma interventions for key populations and PWH found methodologically strong evidence for the effect of interventions targeting HIV stigma at both the structural and individual levels.33”

    From An acceptance-based, intersectional stigma coping intervention for people with HIV who inject drugs—a randomized clinical trial (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results (Outcomes; page unavailable) report consistent reductions in self-stigma in eight studies combining structural- and individual-level components, and the Discussion describes the evidence for approaches that buffer structural risks and enhance individual resilience as consistent and robust. But the Study quality subsection reports substantial variation in methodological quality and limited evidence for social empowerment interventions; the Conclusions also call for more research among key populations. Thus, describing the evidence as methodologically strong across these populations and interventions overstates the review. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Goffman E Stigma: the management of spoiled identity. Harmmondsworth Penguin, 1968.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pantelic, M., Steinert, J. I., Park, J., Mellors, S., & Murau, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Frontline AIDS, Brighton, UK
Corresponding author
Pantelic, Marija
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-03
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
e001285
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924936460
Cited by
156
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Keywords
self-stigma, HIV, people living with HIV, key populations, structural interventions, socio-ecological model, medication stockouts, social empowerment, economic strengthening, young men who have sex with men, female sex workers, men who inject drugs, pregnant women, intersectional stigma, low- and middle-income countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review