Cited by 459Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

Medical Image Data Augmentation: Techniques, Comparisons and Interpretations

Open access
Goceri, Evgin·2023·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

Designing deep learning based methods with medical images has always been an attractive area of research to assist clinicians in rapid examination and accurate diagnosis. Those methods need a large number of datasets including all variations in their training stages. On the other hand, medical images are always scarce due to several reasons, such as not enough patients for some diseases, patients do not want to allow their images to be used, lack of medical equipment or equipment, inability to obtain images that meet the desired criteria. This issue leads to bias in datasets, overfitting, and inaccurate results. Data augmentation is a common solution to overcome this issue and various augmentation techniques have been applied to different types of images in the literature. However, it is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature. Therefore, in this work, the augmentation techniques used to improve performances of deep learning based diagnosis of the diseases in different organs (brain, lung, breast, and eye) from different imaging modalities (MR, CT, mammography, and fundoscopy) have been examined. Also, the most commonly used augmentation methods have been implemented, and their effectiveness in classifications with a deep network has been discussed based on quantitative performance evaluations. Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-023-10453-z

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    The public databases used in this study have imbalanced class distributions.

    “However, the databases have imbalanced class distributions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    For mammography patches or full images, common augmentations were scaling, noise addition, mirroring, shearing, rotation, or combinations of these.

    “Augmentation of patches or whole mammography images have usually been performed by scaling, noise addition, mirroring, shearing, and rotation techniques or using several combinations of them (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For breast mammography images, the combined technique of salt-and-pepper noise addition and shearing was the least appropriate augmentation approach.

    “On the other hand, the combined technique consisting of salt and pepper noise addition and shearing is the least appropriate approach (Table 8).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For breast mammography images, the combined technique of translation, shearing, and rotation was the most appropriate augmentation approach for improving classification into normal, benign, and malignant.

    “Experiments in this study indicated that the combined technique consisting of translation, shearing, and rotation is the most appropriate approach for the augmentation of breast mammography images in order to improve the classification of the images as normal, benign, and malignant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.

    “Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 54
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reviewed mammography applications varied in network architectures, datasets, image counts, and evaluation metrics.

    “In those applications, different network architectures, datasets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The Messidor classes contain 974, 75, and 151 images, respectively.

    “The number of images in the categories is 974, 75, and 151, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    The reported results from those eye fundus applications showed high performance.

    “High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The BRaTS database has 285 brain MR images, with 210 HGG and 75 LGG cases.

    “The BRaTS database contains 285 images including HGG (210 images) and LGG (75 images) cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The LIDC-IDRI database used by LUNA16 contains 1018 CT scans from 1010 people.

    “In the database, there are 1018 CT scans which belong to 1010 people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The INbreast database has 410 mammography images, 107 showing masses, and 115 total mass lesions because one image can contain multiple lesions.

    “It contains 410 images, of which only 107 images show breast masses, and the total number of mass lesions is 115 since an image may contain more than one lesion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reviewed eye fundus applications varied in network structures, datasets, image counts, and evaluation metrics.

    “In those applications, different network structures, data sets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The INbreast database contains 52 benign and 63 malignant masses.

    “The number of benign and malignant masses is 52 and 63, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The reported results from those mammography applications showed high performance.

    “High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Rotation, shearing, flipping, and translation are commonly used to augment eye fundus images and improve deep learning performance.

    “Commonly used augmentation techniques with eye fundus images to boost the performance of deep learning based approaches are rotation, shearing, flipping, and translation (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Messidor database has 1200 eye fundus images divided into three diabetic macular edema risk classes: 0-risk, 1-risk, and 2-risk.

    “Eye fundus images have been provided from the Messidor database (Decencière et al. 2014) including 1200 images categorized into three classes (0-risk, 1-risk, and 2-risk) according to the diabetic macular edema risk level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Augmentation methods can improve deep network learning, generalization, and robustness.

    “Thanks to the augmentation methods, deep network architectures’ learning and generalization ability can be improved, and the desired robustness property of the networks can be provided (Sect. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Deep networks need training sets with many images covering all variations to achieve high generalization and robustness.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The chosen imaging modalities (MR, CT, mammography, fundoscopy) are widely used in medicine for applications such as classification of brain tumors, lung nodules, and breast lesions.

    “The chosen imaging modalities are widely used in medicine for many applications such as classification of brain tumors, lung nodules, and breast lesions (Meijering 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Meijering 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    From reported segmentation or classification results, one cannot compare the impacts or contributions of augmentation approaches or decide the most appropriate method.

    “According to the segmentation or classification results presented in the literature, it is not possible to understand or compare the impacts or contributions of the used augmentation approaches on the results, and to decide the most appropriate augmentation method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Data augmentation is commonly used to address limited and imbalanced medical image datasets.

    “Data augmentation is a common solution to overcome this issue”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Medical image datasets are usually limited in size.
    • Rests on an assumption: Scarcity and imbalance in medical image data cause overfitting, bias, and inaccurate results.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Which augmentation technique yields better results for a given image type remains unclear because studies vary in disease, network architecture, and dataset size.

    “However, it is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “It is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature (Sect. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Translated images help prevent positional bias (Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019) and keep models from focusing on one spatial location (Nalepa et al. 2019).

    “Therefore, translated images provide prevention of positional bias (Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019) and the models do not focus on properties in a single spatial location (Nalepa et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nalepa et al. 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Araújo et al. 2020 synthesized NeoVessel-like structures in a heuristic augmentation to improve proliferative DR detection, an advanced DR stage marked by neovascularization.

    “For instance, NeoVessel (NV)-like structures have been synthesized in a heuristic image augmentation (Ara´ujo et al. 2020) to improve detection of proliferative DR which is an advanced DR stage characterized by neovascularization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ara´ujo et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The paper concludes that refining and segmenting lesion regions before augmentation is the preferred approach for strong detection and classification performance.

    “Also, refinement and segmentation of the lesion regions before the application of an augmentation method is the most preferred way to provide good performance from the detection and classification of the lesions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A classifier model was designed and the same classifier was used for classifications with augmented images from each augmentation method.

    “Additionally, to evaluate the effectiveness of those augmentation methods in classifications from the four types of images, a classifier model has been designed and classifications with the augmented images for each augmentation method have been performed with the same classifier model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Some eye fundus augmentation methods used pixel intensity values because fundus images are colored.

    “Also, pixel intensity values have been used in some augmentation techniques since fundus images are colored images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Shyamalee and Meedeniya 2022 applied a combination of rotation, shearing, zooming, flipping, and shifting for glaucoma identification.

    “For example, in a study (Shyamalee and Meedeniya 2022), a combined method including rotation, shearing, zooming, flipping, and shifting has been applied for glaucoma identification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shyamalee and Meedeniya 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wu et al. 2020b used contextual GAN, which synthesizes lesions based on surrounding tissue context, to improve normal-versus-malignant classification.

    “For instance, contextual GAN, which generates new images by synthesizing lesions according to the context of surrounding tissue, has been applied to improve binary classification (as normal and malignant) by Wu et al. (2020b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wu et al. (2020b)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Zeiser et al. 2020 applied mirroring, zooming, and resizing to improve automated classification into normal, malignant, and benign categories.

    “For instance, a set of augmentation methods (namely mirroring, zooming, and resizing) has been applied to improve automated classification of images into three categories (as normal, malignant, and benign) (Zeiser et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeiser et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Five evaluation metrics were used, and results from each classification were evaluated with the same metrics.

    “Five evaluation metrics have been used, and the results provided from each classification have been evaluated with the same evaluation metrics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ResNet101 was chosen because it has advantages in addressing gradient vanishing and high learning ability.

    “The reason to choose this architecture is to utilize its advantage in addressing the gradient vanishing issue and high learning ability (He et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites He et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Those eye fundus features are used in deep learning methods for tasks such as glaucoma identification, diabetic retinopathy classification, and DR severity identification.

    “Those features are used in deep learning based methods being developed for different purposes like glaucoma identification, classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR), and identification of DR severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Eye fundus features such as neovascularization, hemorrhages/microaneurysms, and exudates are symptoms of eye diseases.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Brain MR studies have also generated synthetic images through Mixup, modified Mixup, or GAN architectures.

    “Although mostly those techniques have been preferred in the literature, augmentation has also been provided by producing synthetic images. To generate synthetic images, Mixup method, which combines two randomly selected images and their labels, or modified Mixup, or GAN structures have been used (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Converting a color image to grayscale can reduce performance by up to 3% (Chatfield et al. 2014).

    “However, converting a color image to its grayscale version should be performed carefully because this conversion reduces performance by up 3% (Chatfield et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chatfield et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Shen et al. 2021 used both contextual and deep convolutional GANs to generate synthetic lesion images with margin and texture information, improving lesion detection and segmentation.

    “In another work (Shen et al. 2021), both contextual and deep convolutional GAN have been used to generate synthetic lesion images with margin and texture information and achieve improvement in the detection and segmentation of lesions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shen et al. 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sun et al. 2021 also applied channel-wise vessel augmentation with morphological transformations.

    “The authors have also applied a channel-wise vessel augmentation using morphological transformations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sun et al. 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Multiple GAN models have generated synthetic images to augment lung CT data.

    “Also, several GAN models have been used to augment lung CT images by generating new synthetic images (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Agustin et al. 2020 used zooming and CLAHE contrast enhancement to improve DR detection robustness.

    “In another work (Agustin et al. 2020), to improve the robustness of DR detection performance, image augmentation has been performed by zooming and a contrast enhancement process known as Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Agustin et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The safety of rotation augmentation depends on the rotation angle.

    “Therefore, the safety of this augmentation technique depends on the rotation degree.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The most commonly used augmentation methods were implemented using the same datasets.

    “Also, in this study, the most commonly used augmentation methods have been implemented using the same datasets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some mammography studies used only GAN-based augmentation.

    “Only GAN based augmentations have also been used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Zhou et al. 2020 and Balasubramanian et al. 2020 used conditional GAN and deep convolutional GAN augmentations to improve automatic DR severity classification.

    “For instance, conditional GAN (Zhou et al. 2020) and deep convolutional GAN (Balasubramanian et al. 2020) based augmentations have been used to increase the performance of the methods developed for automatic classifications of DR according to its severity level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zhou et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Balasubramanian et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Several GAN variants, including conditional, deep convolutional, and cycle GAN, were developed to address GAN augmentation challenges.

    “To overcome those issues, several GAN variants were developed such as conditional, deep convolutional, and cycle GAN.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The main challenging issues of GAN-based image augmentation are generating high-quality images and maintaining training stability.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sun et al. 2021 used channel-wise random gamma correction to improve retinal vessel segmentation.

    “For instance, to achieve robust segmentation of retinal vessels, augmentation has been provided by a channel-wise random gamma correction (Sun et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sun et al. 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    These augmentation techniques were also combined with GANs to create new synthetic images.

    “Also, those techniques have been used together with GANs to provide augmentations with new synthetic images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Alyafi et al. 2020 combined flipping with a deep convolutional GAN for binary classification of mammography images as normal or containing a mass.

    “For instance, flipping and deep convolutional GAN has been combined for binary classifications of images (as normal and with a mass) by Alyafi et al. (2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alyafi et al. (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some eye fundus studies generated and added retinal features, such as lesion and vascular features, to new images.

    “In some works, retinal features (such as lesion and vascular features) have been developed and added to new images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Lung CT images are commonly augmented with traditional operations such as rotation, flipping, and scaling.

    “In computerized methods being developed to assist medical professionals in various tasks [e.g., nodule or lung parenchyma segmentation, nodule classification, prediction of malignancy level, disease diagnosis like coronavirus (covid-19), etc.], augmentations of CT lung images are commonly provided by traditional techniques like rotation, flipping, and scaling (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reviewed eye fundus publications do not allow determining how much augmentation contributed to the reported performances.

    “Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Karthiga et al. 2022, noise and artifacts were removed before dividing images into non-overlapping parts and augmenting them.

    “Similarly, noise and artifacts have been eliminated before the segmentation of the images into non-overlapping parts and augmentation (Karthiga et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karthiga et al. 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    When using GANs on lung CT scans, researchers typically synthesize the nodule region instead of the full image, since nodules are small and this is more cost-effective.

    “While doing a GAN based augmentation of lung CT scans, researchers usually tend to generate the area showing lung nodules in the whole image. Because the lung nodules are small and therefore it is more cost-effective than generating a larger whole image or background area.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Vertical flipping is rarely chosen because the top and bottom of an image are not always interchangeable (Nalepa et al. 2019).

    “Although it can be applied with vertical or/and horizontal axes, vertical flipping is rarely preferred since the bottom and top regions of an image may not always be interchangeable (Nalepa et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nalepa et al. 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To obtain unbiased classification results, an equal number of images were taken from the databases for each class.

    “Therefore, to obtain unbiased classification results, an equal number of images have been taken from the databases for the classes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Brain MR applications have varied in network architecture, dataset, image count, and evaluation metric, with high performance reported.

    “In those applications, different network architectures, datasets, and numbers of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics. High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Kurup et al. 2020 used rotation, translation, mirroring, and zooming for automated malaria retinopathy detection.

    “In a different study (Kurup et al. 2020), combination of rotation, translation, mirroring, and zooming has been used to achieve automated detection of malaria retinopathy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kurup et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Brain MR images have been augmented using methods including rotation, noise addition, shearing, and translation, aiming to enlarge datasets and improve task performance.

    “In the literature, augmentation of brain MR images have been performed with various methods such as rotation, noise addition, shearing, and translation to increase number of images and improve performances of several tasks (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tufail et al. 2021 used shifting and blurring before binary healthy/nonhealthy classification and five-class DR stage classification.

    “Another combined augmentation including shifting and blurring has been used by Tufail et al. (2021) before binary classification (as healthy and nonhealthy) and multi-class (5 classes) classification of images to differentiate different stages of DR.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tufail et al. (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Zeiser et al. 2020, noise reduction and resizing refined images before segmentation and augmentation.

    “For instance, image refinement has been provided by noise reduction and resizing steps, and then segmentation and augmentation steps have been applied (Zeiser et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeiser et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    To compare augmentation methods in deep learning classification, the study used one network architecture and expanded datasets containing images augmented by each method.

    “For comparisons of the effectiveness of the augmentation methods in deep learning-based classifications, the same network architecture and expanded data sets with the augmented images from each augmentation methods have been used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The review examined papers from 2020 to 2022, mainly gathered from Springer, IEEE Xplore, and ELSEVIER.

    “The papers published between 2020 and 2022 and mainly collected by Springer, IEEE Xplore, and ELSEVIER, have been reviewed, and a systematic and comprehensive review and analyses of the augmentation methods have been carried out.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The effectiveness of transformation-based augmentation methods depends on image characteristics such as color and intensity, and on whether all significant visual features for the medical condition are present in the training sets.

    “Also, their effectiveness depends on the characteristics (e.g., color, intensity, etc.) of the images, and whether all significant visual features according to medical conditions exist in the training sets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reviewed lung CT publications do not allow one to isolate how much each augmentation method contributed to reported performance.

    “Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In that augmentation, different NV shapes (trees, wheels, brooms) were generated according to the expected NV shape and location.

    “In this augmentation, different NV kinds (trees, wheels, brooms) have been generated depending on the expected shape and location of NVs to synthesize new images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ara´ujo et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Lung CT applications have varied in network model, dataset, image count, and evaluation metric, with high performance reported.

    “In those applications, different network models, data sets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics. High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The effectiveness of transformation-based augmentation depends on image characteristics and on whether all medically significant visual features are present in the training sets.

    “their effectiveness depends on the characteristics (e.g., color, intensity, etc.) of the images, and whether all significant visual features according to medical conditions exist in the training sets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Manual evaluations of GAN image quality and diversity are subjective and time-consuming because they rely on the physician's domain knowledge.

    “Manual evaluations are subjective as well as time-consuming (Xu et al. 2018) since they are based on the domain knowledge of the physician.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xu et al. 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Ju et al. (2021), GAN-based augmentation may produce biased results by aligning generated images with the target domain distribution.

    “the GAN based augmentation might lead to biased results because of matching the generated images to the distribution of the target domain”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ju et al. (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    GANs suffer from vanishing gradients and mode collapse.

    “GANs have vanishing gradient and mode collapsing problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    GANs require strong computer resources, long processing time, and can hamper generated image quality on low-power computers.

    “Additionally, they require strong computer resources, a long processing time, and hamper the quality of the generated images in case of running on computers having low computational power with constrained resources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Mode collapse restricts the capacity of GAN architecture to be varied, which is detrimental for medical image augmentation.

    “Since the collapse of the mode restricts the capacity of GAN architecture to be varied, this interconnection is detrimental for augmentations of medical images (Zhang 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A synthetic image's quality is characterized by low distortions, fuzziness, noise, and feature distribution matching with the class label.

    “A synthetic image’s quality is characterized by a low level of distortions, fuzziness, noise (Thung and Raveendran 2009), and its feature distribution matching with the class label (Zhou et al. 2020; Costa et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Thung and Raveendran 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhou et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Costa et al. 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Achieving satisfactory training results is difficult when the training procedure does not ensure symmetry and alignment between the generator and discriminator networks.

    “obtaining satisfactory training results is not easy if the training procedure does not assure the symmetry and alignment of both generator and discriminator networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Artifacts can be added during GAN image synthesis, and therefore the quality of produced images can be very low.

    “Artifacts can be added while synthesizing images, and therefore the quality of the produced images can be very low.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    GAN-based augmentation can increase data diversity.

    “GAN based augmentation methods can increase diversity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A significant problem with GANs is vanishing gradient and mode collapsing.

    “A significant problem is vanishing gradient and mode collapsing (Yi et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yi et al. 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GAN-trained models can be unpredictable because GANs are complex and coordinating generator and discriminator is difficult.

    “Also, the trained model can be unpredictable since GANs are complex structures and managing the coordination of the generator and discriminator is difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    GANs are complex, and coordinating the generator and discriminator is difficult.

    “GANs are complex structures and managing the coordination of the generator and discriminator is difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
72 of 72
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Medical image datasets are usually limited in size.

    “However, the number of medical images is usually limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Scarcity and imbalance in medical image data cause overfitting, bias, and inaccurate results.

    “Therefore, imbalanced data causing overfitting, biased and inaccurate results is a significant challenge that should be handled while developing deep network based methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deep networks need training sets with many images covering all variations to achieve high generalization and robustness.

    “Because training data sets should be constructed with a large number of images including all variations (i.e., heterogeneous images) to provide the high generalization ability and robustness of those architectures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No earlier comprehensive review covers a wider range of medical imaging modalities and applications than this paper.

    “According to our knowledge, there is no (i) comprehensive review that covers a greater range of medical imaging modalities and applications than articles in the literature”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No earlier work quantitatively evaluates augmentation methods across different medical images to identify the most suitable method.

    “and (ii) any work on quantitative evaluations of the augmentation methods applied with different medical images to determine the most appropriate augmentation method.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Eye fundus features such as neovascularization, hemorrhages/microaneurysms, and exudates are symptoms of eye diseases.

    “Eye fundus images show various important features, which are symptoms of eye diseases, such as abnormal blood veins (neovascularization), red/reddish spots (hemorrhages, microaneurysms), and bright lesions (soft or hard exudates).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.

    “Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The main challenging issues of GAN-based image augmentation are generating high-quality images and maintaining training stability.

    “The main challenging issues of GAN based image augmentations are generating images with high quality (i.e., high-resolution, clear) and maintaining training stability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Failures in detection or identification of breast lesions lead to unnecessary biopsies or inaccurate diagnoses.

    “Because failures in the detection or identification of the lesions lead to unnecessary biopsies or inaccurate diagnoses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rotation transformation is generally safe on medical images.

    “Although rotation transformation is not safe on images showing 6 and 9 in digit recognition applications, it is generally safe on medical images.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Quality and diversity are critical criteria for evaluating synthetic images from GANs.

    “Quality and diversity are two critical criteria in the evaluation of synthetically generated images from GANs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The validity of similarity measurements for medical image datasets is still under investigation and there is no accepted consensus.

    “The validity of these measurements for medical image data sets is still under investigation and there is no accepted consensus.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no commonly accepted metric for evaluating the diversity and quality of synthesized images.

    “Also, there is no commonly accepted metric for evaluating the diversity and quality of synthesized images.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The images used in the literature have been acquired from different types of fundus cameras.

    “the images used in the literature have been acquired from different types of fundus cameras”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fundus images can be affected by pathological alterations.

    “Also, images can be affected by pathological alterations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The contributions of applied augmentation techniques to reported performances in the current literature are not clear.

    “Also, the contributions of the applied augmentation techniques to the presented performances are not clear.”
16 of 16

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Brain-MR method 7 accuracy falls below both component rates

    Major

    The reported 85.24% binary-classification accuracy is below both its sensitivity of 86.10% and specificity of 96.64%. Accuracy must lie between those two rates.

  • Lung-CT method 2 accuracy falls below both component rates

    Major

    An accuracy of 60.95% cannot coexist with sensitivity of 63.13% and specificity of 73.57% for the same binary classification; accuracy must fall between them.

  • Brain-MR method 10 accuracy falls below both component rates

    Major

    The method identified as best for brain MR images has 88.24% accuracy, yet its reported sensitivity and specificity are 90.48% and 97.13%. Those three binary-classification rates cannot all be correct.

  • Brain-MR method 6 accuracy falls below both component rates

    Major

    For a binary classification, overall accuracy is a weighted average of sensitivity and specificity. The reported 62.38% accuracy cannot be below both 65.16% sensitivity and 70.06% specificity.

  • A cited lung-classification accuracy exceeds both component rates

    Minor

    The Tandon et al. row reports 99.49% accuracy but 99.25% for each of sensitivity and specificity. If these describe the same binary classification, accuracy cannot exceed both.

  • The lung-CT section misidentifies Table 2's image type

    Minor

    The paragraph says Table 2 covers breast mammography augmentation, whereas the table identifies its subject as lung CT images.

  • A cited retinal-classification accuracy is below both component rates

    Minor

    The Kurup et al. row gives 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity but only 81% accuracy. For the same binary detection task, accuracy cannot be lower than both.

  • A cited mammography accuracy exceeds both component rates

    Minor

    The Desai et al. row reports 87.0% accuracy, exceeding both its 86.1% specificity and 85.6% sensitivity. That is impossible for the stated binary image classification.

8 of 8

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Asia AO, Zhu CZ, Althubiti SA, Al-Alimi D, Xiao YL, Ouyang PB, Al-Qaness MA (2020) Detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus images using cnn classification models. Electronics 11:1–20
  2. Bakas S, Reyes M, Jakab A, Bauer S, Rempfler M, Crimi A, Shinohara RT, Berger C, Ha SM, Rozycki M, Prastawa M (2018) Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge. arXiv preprint, pp 1–49. arXiv:1811.02629 · arXiv
  3. Dorizza A (2021) Data augmentation approaches for polyp segmentation. Dissertation, Universita Degli Studi Di Padova
  4. Müller D, Soto-Rey I, Kramer F (2021) Robust chest CT image segmentation of COVID-19 lung infection based on limited data. Inf Med Unlocked 25:1–11
  5. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27:1–9
  6. Tyler ME, Hubbard LD, Boydston K, Pugliese AJ (2009) Characteristics of digital fundus camera systems affecting tonal resolution in color retinal images. J Ophthalmic Photogr 31:1–9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goceri, E.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2023-03-20
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
12561-12605
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W4327909703
Cited by
459
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 200 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 28
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Keywords
medical image classification, data scarcity, overfitting, data bias, neuroimaging, lung imaging, breast imaging, ocular imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, CT, mammography, fundus examination, imaging modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review