Medical Image Data Augmentation: Techniques, Comparisons and Interpretations
Open accessAbstract
Designing deep learning based methods with medical images has always been an attractive area of research to assist clinicians in rapid examination and accurate diagnosis. Those methods need a large number of datasets including all variations in their training stages. On the other hand, medical images are always scarce due to several reasons, such as not enough patients for some diseases, patients do not want to allow their images to be used, lack of medical equipment or equipment, inability to obtain images that meet the desired criteria. This issue leads to bias in datasets, overfitting, and inaccurate results. Data augmentation is a common solution to overcome this issue and various augmentation techniques have been applied to different types of images in the literature. However, it is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature. Therefore, in this work, the augmentation techniques used to improve performances of deep learning based diagnosis of the diseases in different organs (brain, lung, breast, and eye) from different imaging modalities (MR, CT, mammography, and fundoscopy) have been examined. Also, the most commonly used augmentation methods have been implemented, and their effectiveness in classifications with a deep network has been discussed based on quantitative performance evaluations. Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The public databases used in this study have imbalanced class distributions.
“However, the databases have imbalanced class distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For mammography patches or full images, common augmentations were scaling, noise addition, mirroring, shearing, rotation, or combinations of these.
“Augmentation of patches or whole mammography images have usually been performed by scaling, noise addition, mirroring, shearing, and rotation techniques or using several combinations of them (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For breast mammography images, the combined technique of salt-and-pepper noise addition and shearing was the least appropriate augmentation approach.
“On the other hand, the combined technique consisting of salt and pepper noise addition and shearing is the least appropriate approach (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For breast mammography images, the combined technique of translation, shearing, and rotation was the most appropriate augmentation approach for improving classification into normal, benign, and malignant.
“Experiments in this study indicated that the combined technique consisting of translation, shearing, and rotation is the most appropriate approach for the augmentation of breast mammography images in order to improve the classification of the images as normal, benign, and malignant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.
“Experiments indicated that augmentation techniques should be chosen carefully according to image types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
For lung CT images, augmentation only by shearing was the least efficient approach.
“On the other hand, augmentation only by shearing is the least efficient approach (Table 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
After excluding images with slice thickness over 3 mm and those with missing or inconsistently spaced slices, 888 images remained from 1018 cases.
“Therefore, there are a total of 888 images extracted from 1018 cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For brain MR FLAIR images, the combination of rotation with shearing and translation gave higher classification performance for HGG and LGG cases than other augmentation techniques.
“It has been observed that usage of the augmented images obtained by the combination of rotation with shearing, and translation provides higher performance than the other augmentation techniques in the classifications of HGG and LGG cases from FLAIR types of brain images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The best augmentation method for different imaging modalities showing different organs was determined according to quantitative values.
“The best augmentation method for different imaging modalities showing different organs has been determined according to quantitative values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For lung CT images, the combination of translation and shearing gave the highest classification performance for nodules versus non-nodules compared with other augmentation methods.
“It has been observed that usage of the augmented images obtained by the combination of translation and shearing techniques in the classification of images with nodules and without nodules provides the highest performance than the other augmentation methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For brain MR FLAIR images, the combination of shearing and salt-and-pepper noise addition was the least efficient augmentation approach for improving classification performance.
“On the other hand, augmentation with the combination of shearing and salt-and-pepper noise addition is the least efficient approach for augmentation in improving classification performance (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study's experiments, translation augmentation was the least effective method for improving classification performance on eye fundus images.
“augmentation with translation is the least efficient approach for augmentation to improve classification performance (Table 9).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“augmentation with translation is the least efficient approach for augmentation to improve classification performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Findingnone given
The applications reviewed in the current literature reported high performance (Table 4).
“although the results of the applications in the current literature indicated high performances (Table 4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For classifying lung CT images with and without nodules, using only shearing was the least effective augmentation approach.
“augmentation only by shearing is the least efficient approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For classifying lung CT images with and without nodules, combining translation and shearing gave the highest performance among augmentation methods.
“Combination of translation and shearing techniques in the classification of lung CT images with nodules and without nodules provides the highest performance than the other augmentation methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
For classifying HGG and LGG cases from FLAIR brain images, combining shearing with salt-and-pepper noise addition was the least effective augmentation approach.
“augmentation with the combination of shearing and salt-and-pepper noise addition is the least efficient approach for augmentation in improving classification performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study's experiments, combining color shifting with sharpening and contrast changing gave higher classification performance for eye fundus images than other augmentation techniques.
“Experiments in this study indicated that usage of the augmented images obtained by the combination of color shifting with sharpening, and contrast changing provides higher performance than the other augmentation techniques in the classifications of eye fundus images.”
- Also stated in: § Discussions · plain
“Combination of color shifting with sharpening, and contrast changing provides higher performance than the other augmentation techniques in the classifications of eye fundus images.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussions · plain
- Findingnone given
For classifying HGG and LGG cases from FLAIR brain images, combining rotation with shearing and translation yielded higher performance than other augmentation techniques.
“Combination of rotation with shearing, and translation provides higher performance than the other augmentation techniques in the classifications of HGG and LGG cases from FLAIR types of brain images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For classifying breast mammography images as normal, benign, or malignant, combining translation, shearing, and rotation is the most appropriate augmentation approach.
“Combination of translation, shearing, and rotation is the most appropriate approach for the augmentation of breast mammography images in order to improve the classification of the images as normal, benign, and malignant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
For classifying breast mammography images as normal, benign, or malignant, combining salt-and-pepper noise addition with shearing is the least appropriate augmentation approach.
“the combined technique consisting of salt and pepper noise addition and shearing is the least appropriate approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Some reviewed mammography studies augmented extracted positive and negative patches rather than full images.
“In some works, in the literature, augmentation methods have been applied on extracted positive and negative patches instead of the whole image (Karthiga et al. 2022; Zeiser et al. 2020; Miller et al. 2022; Kim and Kim 2022; Wu et al. 2020b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Differences among studies leave the most suitable augmentation method for brain MR images undetermined.
“However, the most effective and appropriate augmentation method used in them with the brain MR images is not clear due to those differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reviewed brain MR publications do not allow one to isolate how much each augmentation method contributed to reported performance.
“Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reviewed mammography publications do not allow determining how much augmentation contributed to the reported performances.
“Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
For mammography, augmentation has been used in reviewed studies to enhance automated detection, segmentation, and recognition of breast lesions.
“Generally, augmentation methods with mammography images have been applied to improve automated recognition, segmentation, and detection of breast lesions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Failures in detection or identification of breast lesions lead to unnecessary biopsies or inaccurate diagnoses.
- Interpretationreasoning
Because of those differences, the best or most suitable augmentation method for eye fundus images remains unclear.
“However, the most effective and appropriate augmentation method used in them with eye fundus images is not clear due to those differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because of those differences, the best or most suitable augmentation method for mammography images remains unclear.
“However, the most effective and appropriate augmentation method used in them with breast mammography images is not clear due to those differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Pre-training has provided superior results on many tasks, including action recognition, image segmentation, and object detection.
“Pre-training has provided superior results on many tasks, such as action recognition (Simonyan and Zisserman 2014; Carreira and Zisserman 2017), image segmentation (He et al. 2017; Long et al. 2015), and object detection (Ren et al. 2015; Girshick 2015; Girshick et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Simonyan and Zisserman 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Carreira and Zisserman 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites He et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Differences among studies leave the most suitable augmentation method for lung CT images undetermined.
“However, the most effective and appropriate augmentation method used in them with the lung CT images is not clear due to those differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Expanding training datasets with low-quality synthetic images prevents the classifier from learning features representing different classes, leading to low classification performance.
“When the training datasets are expanded by adding synthetic images with low quality, the classifier cannot learn the features representing different classes which leads to low classification performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Quality and diversity are critical criteria for evaluating synthetic images from GANs.
- Interpretationreasoning
If most training images have similar features, there is a risk of constructing a classifier with overfitting and less generalization capability.
“If most of the images in the training sets have similar features, then there is a risk of constructing a classifier model with overfitting and less generalization capability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The diversity and quality of GAN-generated images are evaluated manually by a physician or quantitatively using similarity measures, generally FID, structural similarity index, and peak signal-to-noise ratio.
“The diversity and quality of the new images produced by GANs are evaluated manually by a physician or quantitatively by using similarity evaluation measurements, which are generally FID, structural similarity index, and peak signal-to-noise ratio (Borji 2019; Xu et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Borji 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Xu et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
In Zhou et al. (2020), the generator's output quality is contingent on the quality of those input masks.
“Therefore, the generator’s performance depends on the quality of those masks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Expanding training datasets with images lacking diversity can limit coverage of the target domain and cause low classification performance due to incorrect classification of features from less represented regions.
“When the training datasets are expanded with the images lacking diversity, the datasets can provide only limited coverage of the target domain and cause low classification performance due to incorrect classifications of the images containing features that belong to the less represented regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Quality and diversity are critical criteria for evaluating synthetic images from GANs.
- Premisecitation
In Zhou et al. (2020), the lesion and structural masks supplied as inputs were not true ground-truth images.
“the lesion and structural masks used as inputs are not real ground truth images”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Computer-assisted applications that work well on images from one fundus camera may not transfer to images from other fundus camera models.
“Therefore, the presented applications fitting well to images obtained from a fundus camera may not generalize images from other kinds of fundus camera systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The images used in the literature have been acquired from different types of fundus cameras.
- Premisecitation
The tonal qualities of fundus images are influenced by the characteristics of fundus cameras.
“Because the tone qualities of fundus images are affected by the properties of fundus cameras (Tyler et al. 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tyler et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Zhou et al. (2020), the GAN architecture used could not synthesize certain lesions, including microaneurysms.
“the applied GAN architecture fails to synthesize some lesions, such as microaneurysms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. (2020) source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 29
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 54
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reviewed mammography applications varied in network architectures, datasets, image counts, and evaluation metrics.
“In those applications, different network architectures, datasets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe Messidor classes contain 974, 75, and 151 images, respectively.
“The number of images in the categories is 974, 75, and 151, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe reported results from those eye fundus applications showed high performance.
“High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe BRaTS database has 285 brain MR images, with 210 HGG and 75 LGG cases.
“The BRaTS database contains 285 images including HGG (210 images) and LGG (75 images) cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe LIDC-IDRI database used by LUNA16 contains 1018 CT scans from 1010 people.
“In the database, there are 1018 CT scans which belong to 1010 people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe INbreast database has 410 mammography images, 107 showing masses, and 115 total mass lesions because one image can contain multiple lesions.
“It contains 410 images, of which only 107 images show breast masses, and the total number of mass lesions is 115 since an image may contain more than one lesion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reviewed eye fundus applications varied in network structures, datasets, image counts, and evaluation metrics.
“In those applications, different network structures, data sets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe INbreast database contains 52 benign and 63 malignant masses.
“The number of benign and malignant masses is 52 and 63, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe reported results from those mammography applications showed high performance.
“High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRotation, shearing, flipping, and translation are commonly used to augment eye fundus images and improve deep learning performance.
“Commonly used augmentation techniques with eye fundus images to boost the performance of deep learning based approaches are rotation, shearing, flipping, and translation (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Messidor database has 1200 eye fundus images divided into three diabetic macular edema risk classes: 0-risk, 1-risk, and 2-risk.
“Eye fundus images have been provided from the Messidor database (Decencière et al. 2014) including 1200 images categorized into three classes (0-risk, 1-risk, and 2-risk) according to the diabetic macular edema risk level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAugmentation methods can improve deep network learning, generalization, and robustness.
“Thanks to the augmentation methods, deep network architectures’ learning and generalization ability can be improved, and the desired robustness property of the networks can be provided (Sect. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deep networks need training sets with many images covering all variations to achieve high generalization and robustness.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe chosen imaging modalities (MR, CT, mammography, fundoscopy) are widely used in medicine for applications such as classification of brain tumors, lung nodules, and breast lesions.
“The chosen imaging modalities are widely used in medicine for many applications such as classification of brain tumors, lung nodules, and breast lesions (Meijering 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meijering 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFrom reported segmentation or classification results, one cannot compare the impacts or contributions of augmentation approaches or decide the most appropriate method.
“According to the segmentation or classification results presented in the literature, it is not possible to understand or compare the impacts or contributions of the used augmentation approaches on the results, and to decide the most appropriate augmentation method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningData augmentation is commonly used to address limited and imbalanced medical image datasets.
“Data augmentation is a common solution to overcome this issue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Medical image datasets are usually limited in size.
- Rests on an assumption: Scarcity and imbalance in medical image data cause overfitting, bias, and inaccurate results.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningWhich augmentation technique yields better results for a given image type remains unclear because studies vary in disease, network architecture, and dataset size.
“However, it is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“It is not clear which data augmentation technique provides more efficient results for which image type since different diseases are handled, different network architectures are used, and these architectures are trained and tested with different numbers of data sets in the literature (Sect. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTranslated images help prevent positional bias (Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019) and keep models from focusing on one spatial location (Nalepa et al. 2019).
“Therefore, translated images provide prevention of positional bias (Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019) and the models do not focus on properties in a single spatial location (Nalepa et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shorten and Khoshgoftaar 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nalepa et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAraújo et al. 2020 synthesized NeoVessel-like structures in a heuristic augmentation to improve proliferative DR detection, an advanced DR stage marked by neovascularization.
“For instance, NeoVessel (NV)-like structures have been synthesized in a heuristic image augmentation (Ara´ujo et al. 2020) to improve detection of proliferative DR which is an advanced DR stage characterized by neovascularization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ara´ujo et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe paper concludes that refining and segmenting lesion regions before augmentation is the preferred approach for strong detection and classification performance.
“Also, refinement and segmentation of the lesion regions before the application of an augmentation method is the most preferred way to provide good performance from the detection and classification of the lesions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA classifier model was designed and the same classifier was used for classifications with augmented images from each augmentation method.
“Additionally, to evaluate the effectiveness of those augmentation methods in classifications from the four types of images, a classifier model has been designed and classifications with the augmented images for each augmentation method have been performed with the same classifier model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningSome eye fundus augmentation methods used pixel intensity values because fundus images are colored.
“Also, pixel intensity values have been used in some augmentation techniques since fundus images are colored images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationShyamalee and Meedeniya 2022 applied a combination of rotation, shearing, zooming, flipping, and shifting for glaucoma identification.
“For example, in a study (Shyamalee and Meedeniya 2022), a combined method including rotation, shearing, zooming, flipping, and shifting has been applied for glaucoma identification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shyamalee and Meedeniya 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWu et al. 2020b used contextual GAN, which synthesizes lesions based on surrounding tissue context, to improve normal-versus-malignant classification.
“For instance, contextual GAN, which generates new images by synthesizing lesions according to the context of surrounding tissue, has been applied to improve binary classification (as normal and malignant) by Wu et al. (2020b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al. (2020b)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationZeiser et al. 2020 applied mirroring, zooming, and resizing to improve automated classification into normal, malignant, and benign categories.
“For instance, a set of augmentation methods (namely mirroring, zooming, and resizing) has been applied to improve automated classification of images into three categories (as normal, malignant, and benign) (Zeiser et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeiser et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFive evaluation metrics were used, and results from each classification were evaluated with the same metrics.
“Five evaluation metrics have been used, and the results provided from each classification have been evaluated with the same evaluation metrics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResNet101 was chosen because it has advantages in addressing gradient vanishing and high learning ability.
“The reason to choose this architecture is to utilize its advantage in addressing the gradient vanishing issue and high learning ability (He et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThose eye fundus features are used in deep learning methods for tasks such as glaucoma identification, diabetic retinopathy classification, and DR severity identification.
“Those features are used in deep learning based methods being developed for different purposes like glaucoma identification, classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR), and identification of DR severity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Eye fundus features such as neovascularization, hemorrhages/microaneurysms, and exudates are symptoms of eye diseases.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningBrain MR studies have also generated synthetic images through Mixup, modified Mixup, or GAN architectures.
“Although mostly those techniques have been preferred in the literature, augmentation has also been provided by producing synthetic images. To generate synthetic images, Mixup method, which combines two randomly selected images and their labels, or modified Mixup, or GAN structures have been used (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConverting a color image to grayscale can reduce performance by up to 3% (Chatfield et al. 2014).
“However, converting a color image to its grayscale version should be performed carefully because this conversion reduces performance by up 3% (Chatfield et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chatfield et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationShen et al. 2021 used both contextual and deep convolutional GANs to generate synthetic lesion images with margin and texture information, improving lesion detection and segmentation.
“In another work (Shen et al. 2021), both contextual and deep convolutional GAN have been used to generate synthetic lesion images with margin and texture information and achieve improvement in the detection and segmentation of lesions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shen et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSun et al. 2021 also applied channel-wise vessel augmentation with morphological transformations.
“The authors have also applied a channel-wise vessel augmentation using morphological transformations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningMultiple GAN models have generated synthetic images to augment lung CT data.
“Also, several GAN models have been used to augment lung CT images by generating new synthetic images (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAgustin et al. 2020 used zooming and CLAHE contrast enhancement to improve DR detection robustness.
“In another work (Agustin et al. 2020), to improve the robustness of DR detection performance, image augmentation has been performed by zooming and a contrast enhancement process known as Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agustin et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe safety of rotation augmentation depends on the rotation angle.
“Therefore, the safety of this augmentation technique depends on the rotation degree.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe most commonly used augmentation methods were implemented using the same datasets.
“Also, in this study, the most commonly used augmentation methods have been implemented using the same datasets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome mammography studies used only GAN-based augmentation.
“Only GAN based augmentations have also been used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationZhou et al. 2020 and Balasubramanian et al. 2020 used conditional GAN and deep convolutional GAN augmentations to improve automatic DR severity classification.
“For instance, conditional GAN (Zhou et al. 2020) and deep convolutional GAN (Balasubramanian et al. 2020) based augmentations have been used to increase the performance of the methods developed for automatic classifications of DR according to its severity level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Balasubramanian et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningSeveral GAN variants, including conditional, deep convolutional, and cycle GAN, were developed to address GAN augmentation challenges.
“To overcome those issues, several GAN variants were developed such as conditional, deep convolutional, and cycle GAN.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The main challenging issues of GAN-based image augmentation are generating high-quality images and maintaining training stability.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSun et al. 2021 used channel-wise random gamma correction to improve retinal vessel segmentation.
“For instance, to achieve robust segmentation of retinal vessels, augmentation has been provided by a channel-wise random gamma correction (Sun et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al. 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese augmentation techniques were also combined with GANs to create new synthetic images.
“Also, those techniques have been used together with GANs to provide augmentations with new synthetic images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAlyafi et al. 2020 combined flipping with a deep convolutional GAN for binary classification of mammography images as normal or containing a mass.
“For instance, flipping and deep convolutional GAN has been combined for binary classifications of images (as normal and with a mass) by Alyafi et al. (2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alyafi et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome eye fundus studies generated and added retinal features, such as lesion and vascular features, to new images.
“In some works, retinal features (such as lesion and vascular features) have been developed and added to new images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLung CT images are commonly augmented with traditional operations such as rotation, flipping, and scaling.
“In computerized methods being developed to assist medical professionals in various tasks [e.g., nodule or lung parenchyma segmentation, nodule classification, prediction of malignancy level, disease diagnosis like coronavirus (covid-19), etc.], augmentations of CT lung images are commonly provided by traditional techniques like rotation, flipping, and scaling (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe reviewed eye fundus publications do not allow determining how much augmentation contributed to the reported performances.
“Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Karthiga et al. 2022, noise and artifacts were removed before dividing images into non-overlapping parts and augmenting them.
“Similarly, noise and artifacts have been eliminated before the segmentation of the images into non-overlapping parts and augmentation (Karthiga et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karthiga et al. 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningWhen using GANs on lung CT scans, researchers typically synthesize the nodule region instead of the full image, since nodules are small and this is more cost-effective.
“While doing a GAN based augmentation of lung CT scans, researchers usually tend to generate the area showing lung nodules in the whole image. Because the lung nodules are small and therefore it is more cost-effective than generating a larger whole image or background area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVertical flipping is rarely chosen because the top and bottom of an image are not always interchangeable (Nalepa et al. 2019).
“Although it can be applied with vertical or/and horizontal axes, vertical flipping is rarely preferred since the bottom and top regions of an image may not always be interchangeable (Nalepa et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nalepa et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo obtain unbiased classification results, an equal number of images were taken from the databases for each class.
“Therefore, to obtain unbiased classification results, an equal number of images have been taken from the databases for the classes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBrain MR applications have varied in network architecture, dataset, image count, and evaluation metric, with high performance reported.
“In those applications, different network architectures, datasets, and numbers of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics. High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKurup et al. 2020 used rotation, translation, mirroring, and zooming for automated malaria retinopathy detection.
“In a different study (Kurup et al. 2020), combination of rotation, translation, mirroring, and zooming has been used to achieve automated detection of malaria retinopathy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kurup et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBrain MR images have been augmented using methods including rotation, noise addition, shearing, and translation, aiming to enlarge datasets and improve task performance.
“In the literature, augmentation of brain MR images have been performed with various methods such as rotation, noise addition, shearing, and translation to increase number of images and improve performances of several tasks (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTufail et al. 2021 used shifting and blurring before binary healthy/nonhealthy classification and five-class DR stage classification.
“Another combined augmentation including shifting and blurring has been used by Tufail et al. (2021) before binary classification (as healthy and nonhealthy) and multi-class (5 classes) classification of images to differentiate different stages of DR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tufail et al. (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Zeiser et al. 2020, noise reduction and resizing refined images before segmentation and augmentation.
“For instance, image refinement has been provided by noise reduction and resizing steps, and then segmentation and augmentation steps have been applied (Zeiser et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeiser et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTo compare augmentation methods in deep learning classification, the study used one network architecture and expanded datasets containing images augmented by each method.
“For comparisons of the effectiveness of the augmentation methods in deep learning-based classifications, the same network architecture and expanded data sets with the augmented images from each augmentation methods have been used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe review examined papers from 2020 to 2022, mainly gathered from Springer, IEEE Xplore, and ELSEVIER.
“The papers published between 2020 and 2022 and mainly collected by Springer, IEEE Xplore, and ELSEVIER, have been reviewed, and a systematic and comprehensive review and analyses of the augmentation methods have been carried out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe effectiveness of transformation-based augmentation methods depends on image characteristics such as color and intensity, and on whether all significant visual features for the medical condition are present in the training sets.
“Also, their effectiveness depends on the characteristics (e.g., color, intensity, etc.) of the images, and whether all significant visual features according to medical conditions exist in the training sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe reviewed lung CT publications do not allow one to isolate how much each augmentation method contributed to reported performance.
“Also, it is not possible to determine augmentation methods’ contributions to those performances according to the presented results in those publications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn that augmentation, different NV shapes (trees, wheels, brooms) were generated according to the expected NV shape and location.
“In this augmentation, different NV kinds (trees, wheels, brooms) have been generated depending on the expected shape and location of NVs to synthesize new images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ara´ujo et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLung CT applications have varied in network model, dataset, image count, and evaluation metric, with high performance reported.
“In those applications, different network models, data sets and number of images have been used, and also their performances have been evaluated with different metrics. High performances have been obtained from those applications according to the reported results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe effectiveness of transformation-based augmentation depends on image characteristics and on whether all medically significant visual features are present in the training sets.
“their effectiveness depends on the characteristics (e.g., color, intensity, etc.) of the images, and whether all significant visual features according to medical conditions exist in the training sets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationManual evaluations of GAN image quality and diversity are subjective and time-consuming because they rely on the physician's domain knowledge.
“Manual evaluations are subjective as well as time-consuming (Xu et al. 2018) since they are based on the domain knowledge of the physician.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Ju et al. (2021), GAN-based augmentation may produce biased results by aligning generated images with the target domain distribution.
“the GAN based augmentation might lead to biased results because of matching the generated images to the distribution of the target domain”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ju et al. (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGANs suffer from vanishing gradients and mode collapse.
“GANs have vanishing gradient and mode collapsing problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGANs require strong computer resources, long processing time, and can hamper generated image quality on low-power computers.
“Additionally, they require strong computer resources, a long processing time, and hamper the quality of the generated images in case of running on computers having low computational power with constrained resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMode collapse restricts the capacity of GAN architecture to be varied, which is detrimental for medical image augmentation.
“Since the collapse of the mode restricts the capacity of GAN architecture to be varied, this interconnection is detrimental for augmentations of medical images (Zhang 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA synthetic image's quality is characterized by low distortions, fuzziness, noise, and feature distribution matching with the class label.
“A synthetic image’s quality is characterized by a low level of distortions, fuzziness, noise (Thung and Raveendran 2009), and its feature distribution matching with the class label (Zhou et al. 2020; Costa et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Thung and Raveendran 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhou et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Costa et al. 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAchieving satisfactory training results is difficult when the training procedure does not ensure symmetry and alignment between the generator and discriminator networks.
“obtaining satisfactory training results is not easy if the training procedure does not assure the symmetry and alignment of both generator and discriminator networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningArtifacts can be added during GAN image synthesis, and therefore the quality of produced images can be very low.
“Artifacts can be added while synthesizing images, and therefore the quality of the produced images can be very low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGAN-based augmentation can increase data diversity.
“GAN based augmentation methods can increase diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA significant problem with GANs is vanishing gradient and mode collapsing.
“A significant problem is vanishing gradient and mode collapsing (Yi et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yi et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGAN-trained models can be unpredictable because GANs are complex and coordinating generator and discriminator is difficult.
“Also, the trained model can be unpredictable since GANs are complex structures and managing the coordination of the generator and discriminator is difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGANs are complex, and coordinating the generator and discriminator is difficult.
“GANs are complex structures and managing the coordination of the generator and discriminator is difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Medical image datasets are usually limited in size.
“However, the number of medical images is usually limited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Scarcity and imbalance in medical image data cause overfitting, bias, and inaccurate results.
“Therefore, imbalanced data causing overfitting, biased and inaccurate results is a significant challenge that should be handled while developing deep network based methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep networks need training sets with many images covering all variations to achieve high generalization and robustness.
“Because training data sets should be constructed with a large number of images including all variations (i.e., heterogeneous images) to provide the high generalization ability and robustness of those architectures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No earlier comprehensive review covers a wider range of medical imaging modalities and applications than this paper.
“According to our knowledge, there is no (i) comprehensive review that covers a greater range of medical imaging modalities and applications than articles in the literature”
The paper relies on this without support.
No earlier work quantitatively evaluates augmentation methods across different medical images to identify the most suitable method.
“and (ii) any work on quantitative evaluations of the augmentation methods applied with different medical images to determine the most appropriate augmentation method.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Eye fundus features such as neovascularization, hemorrhages/microaneurysms, and exudates are symptoms of eye diseases.
“Eye fundus images show various important features, which are symptoms of eye diseases, such as abnormal blood veins (neovascularization), red/reddish spots (hemorrhages, microaneurysms), and bright lesions (soft or hard exudates).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.
“Image labels may not always be preserved if the degree of rotation increases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The main challenging issues of GAN-based image augmentation are generating high-quality images and maintaining training stability.
“The main challenging issues of GAN based image augmentations are generating images with high quality (i.e., high-resolution, clear) and maintaining training stability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Failures in detection or identification of breast lesions lead to unnecessary biopsies or inaccurate diagnoses.
“Because failures in the detection or identification of the lesions lead to unnecessary biopsies or inaccurate diagnoses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rotation transformation is generally safe on medical images.
“Although rotation transformation is not safe on images showing 6 and 9 in digit recognition applications, it is generally safe on medical images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quality and diversity are critical criteria for evaluating synthetic images from GANs.
“Quality and diversity are two critical criteria in the evaluation of synthetically generated images from GANs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The validity of similarity measurements for medical image datasets is still under investigation and there is no accepted consensus.
“The validity of these measurements for medical image data sets is still under investigation and there is no accepted consensus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no commonly accepted metric for evaluating the diversity and quality of synthesized images.
“Also, there is no commonly accepted metric for evaluating the diversity and quality of synthesized images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The images used in the literature have been acquired from different types of fundus cameras.
“the images used in the literature have been acquired from different types of fundus cameras”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fundus images can be affected by pathological alterations.
“Also, images can be affected by pathological alterations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The contributions of applied augmentation techniques to reported performances in the current literature are not clear.
“Also, the contributions of the applied augmentation techniques to the presented performances are not clear.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Laboratory performance does not always translate directly to clinical practice.
“Laboratory performance does not always translate directly to clinical practice [142,143,144,145,146].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Brain-MR method 7 accuracy falls below both component rates
MajorThe reported 85.24% binary-classification accuracy is below both its sensitivity of 86.10% and specificity of 96.64%. Accuracy must lie between those two rates.
“| 7th augmentation method | 85.24 |”
“| 86.10 | 96.64 | 84.35 | 81.41 |”
Lung-CT method 2 accuracy falls below both component rates
MajorAn accuracy of 60.95% cannot coexist with sensitivity of 63.13% and specificity of 73.57% for the same binary classification; accuracy must fall between them.
“| 2nd augmentation method | 60.95 |”
“| 63.13 | 73.57 | 60.28 | 51.97 |”
Brain-MR method 10 accuracy falls below both component rates
MajorThe method identified as best for brain MR images has 88.24% accuracy, yet its reported sensitivity and specificity are 90.48% and 97.13%. Those three binary-classification rates cannot all be correct.
“| 10th augmentation method | 88.24 |”
“| 90.48 | 97.13 | 88.52 | 82.79 |”
Brain-MR method 6 accuracy falls below both component rates
MajorFor a binary classification, overall accuracy is a weighted average of sensitivity and specificity. The reported 62.38% accuracy cannot be below both 65.16% sensitivity and 70.06% specificity.
“| 6th augmentation method | 62.38 |”
“| 65.16 | 70.06 | 62.51 | 56.08 |”
A cited lung-classification accuracy exceeds both component rates
MinorThe Tandon et al. row reports 99.49% accuracy but 99.25% for each of sensitivity and specificity. If these describe the same binary classification, accuracy cannot exceed both.
“Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1-score are 99.49%,”
“99.25%, 99.25%, and 99.12%, respectively”
The lung-CT section misidentifies Table 2's image type
MinorThe paragraph says Table 2 covers breast mammography augmentation, whereas the table identifies its subject as lung CT images.
“All methods applied for augmentation of breast mammography images in the publications reviewed in this study and the details in those publications are presented in Table 2.”
“Table: Table 2 Augmentation methods applied with lung CT images and details given in publications”
A cited retinal-classification accuracy is below both component rates
MinorThe Kurup et al. row gives 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity but only 81% accuracy. For the same binary detection task, accuracy cannot be lower than both.
“Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy values are 90%, 100%, and 81% respectively”
“Malarial retinopathy detection”
A cited mammography accuracy exceeds both component rates
MinorThe Desai et al. row reports 87.0% accuracy, exceeding both its 86.1% specificity and 85.6% sensitivity. That is impossible for the stated binary image classification.
“accuracy, and sensitivity are 88.0%,86.1%, 87.0%, and 85.6%, respectively”
“Image classification (as normal, and cancer)”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834 · see citing works
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · see citing works
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137 · see citing works
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105 · see citing works
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 · Cited by 13,203 · see citing works
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Shelhamer, E., Long, J., & Darrell, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2572683 · Cited by 11,898 · see citing works
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
Carreira, J., & Zisserman, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.502 · Cited by 9,570 · see citing works
Armato, S. G., McLennan, G., Bidaut, L., McNitt‐Gray, M. F., Meyer, C. R., Reeves, A. P., Zhao, B., Aberle, D. R., Henschke, C. I., Hoffman, E. A., et al. (2011) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3528204 · Cited by 2,887 · see citing works
Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review
Xin, Y., Walia, E., & Babyn, P. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101552 · Cited by 1,883 · see citing works
FEEDBACK ON A PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED IMAGE DATABASE: THE MESSIDOR DATABASE
Decencière, É., Zhang, X., Cazuguel, G., Laÿ, B., Cochener, B., Trone, C., Gain, P., Ordonez, R., Massin, P., Erginay, A., et al. (2014) · Image Analysis & Stereology · doi:10.5566/ias.1155 · Cited by 1,433 · see citing works
Setio, A. A. A., Traverso, A., de Bel, T., Berens, M. S. N., van den Bogaard, C., Cerello, P., Chen, H., Dou, Q., Fantacci, M. E., Geurts, B. H. J., et al. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.06.015 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 · Cited by 1,328 · see citing works
Moreira, I. C., Amaral, I., Domingues, I., Cardoso, A. N. L., Cardoso, M. J., & Cardoso, J. S. (2011) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.09.014 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysis
Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhang, K., Fung, K.-M. A., Thai, T., Moore, K. N., Mannel, R. S., Liu, H., Zheng, B., & Qiu, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102444 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning applications
Chlap, P., Min, H., Vandenberg, N., Dowling, J., Holloway, L. C., & Haworth, A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/1754-9485.13261 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Naidich, D. P., Bankier, A. A., MacMahon, H., Schaefer‐Prokop, C. M., Pistolesi, M., Goo, J. M., Macchiarini, P., Crapo, J. D., Herold, C., Austin, J. H. M., et al. (2012) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.12120628 · Cited by 982 · see citing works
Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures
Borji, A. (2019) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.009 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into Convolutional NetsPreprint
Chatfield, K., Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., et al. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1405.3531 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
nnU-Net for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Full, P. M., Vollmuth, P., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72087-2_11 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classification
Bayer, M., Kaufhold, M., & Reuter, C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3544558 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Yu, H., Yang, L. T., Zhang, Q., Armstrong, D., & Deen, M. J. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.157 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
End-to-End Adversarial Retinal Image Synthesis
Costa, P., Galdrán, A., Meyer, M. I., Niemeijer, M., Abràmoff, M. D., Mendonça, A. M., & Campilho, A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2759102 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Networks in Medical Image augmentation: A review
Chen, Y., Yang, X.-H., Wei, Z., Heidari, A. A., Zheng, N., Li, Z., Chen, H., Hu, H., Zhou, Q., & Guan, Q. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105382 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Shmelkov, K., Schmid, C., & Alahari, K. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_14 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Srinivas, C., Shivaprasad, N. P. K., Zakariah, M., Alotaibi, Y. A., Shaukat, K., Partibane, B., & Halifa, A. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/3264367 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Brain-Tumor Segmentation: A Review
Nalepa, J., Marcinkiewicz, M., & Kawulok, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00083 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Deep learning models in medical image analysis
Tsuneki, M. (2022) · Journal of Oral Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.job.2022.03.003 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: Automated CNN approach
Salama, W. M., & Aly, M. H. (2021) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.048 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Khan, A. R., Khan, S. M., Harouni, M., Abbasi, R., Iqbal, S., & Mehmood, Z. (2021) · Microscopy Research and Technique · doi:10.1002/jemt.23694 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networksPreprint
Xu, Q., Huang, G. M., Yuan, Y., Guo, C., Sun, Y., Wu, F., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.07755 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
McNitt‐Gray, M. F., Armato, S. G., Meyer, C. R., Reeves, A. P., McLennan, G., Pais, R. C., Freymann, J., Brown, M. S., Engelmann, R. M., Bland, P. H., et al. (2007) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.021 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
A survey of image quality measures
Thung, K.-H., & Raveendran, P. (2009) · 2009 International Conference for Technical Postgraduates (TECHPOS) · doi:10.1109/techpos.2009.5412098 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Explainable COVID-19 Detection Using Chest CT Scans and Deep Learning
Alshazly, H. A., Linse, C., Barth, E., & Martinetz, T. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21020455 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Enhancing Performance of Deep Learning Models with different Data Augmentation Techniques: A Survey
Khosla, C., & Saini, B. S. (2020) · International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM) · doi:10.1109/iciem48762.2020.9160048 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
YOLO Based Breast Masses Detection and Classification in Full-Field Digital Mammograms
Hamed, G., Marey, M. A. E.-R., Amin, S. E.-S., & Tolba, M. F. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105823 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Islam, M. R., Abdulrazak, L. F., Nahiduzzaman, M., Goni, M. O. F., Anower, M. S., Ahsan, M., Haider, J., & Kowalski, M. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105602 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Wang, B., He, X., Cui, S., & Shao, L. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2020.3045475 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Humayun, M., Sujatha, R., Almuayqil, S. N., & Jhanjhi, N. Z. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10061058 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
(2020) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3014328 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
A bird's-eye view of deep learning in bioimage analysis
Meijering, E. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.003 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Mahmood, T., Li, J., Pei, Y., Akhtar, F., Rehman, M. U., & Wasti, S. H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263126 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Image Augmentation Techniques for Mammogram Analysis
Oza, P., Sharma, P., Patel, S., Adedoyin, F. F., & Bruno, A. (2022) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging8050141 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Zahoor, S., Shoaib, U., & Lali, I. U. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020557 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Dual Convolutional Neural Networks for Breast Mass Segmentation and Diagnosis in Mammography
Li, H., Chen, D., Nailon, W. H., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3102622 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Mok, T. C. W., & Chung, A. C. S. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11723-8_7 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Stabilizing Adversarial Nets With Prediction MethodsPreprint
Yadav, A., Shah, S., Xu, Z., Jacobs, D., & Goldstein, T. (2017) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07364 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
TumorGAN: A Multi-Modal Data Augmentation Framework for Brain Tumor Segmentation
Li, Q., Yu, Z., Wang, Y., & Zheng, H. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20154203 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Segmentation of Masses on Mammograms Using Data Augmentation and Deep Learning
Zeiser, F. A., da Costa, C. A., Zonta, T., Marques, N. M. C., Roehe, A. V., Moreno, M., & da Rosa Righi, R. (2020) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-020-00330-4 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Optimal DeepMRSeg based tumor segmentation with GAN for brain tumor classification
Neelima, G., Chigurukota, D. R., Maram, B., et al. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103537 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Retinal image synthesis from multiple-landmarks input with generative adversarial networks
Yu, Z.-K., Xiang, Q., Meng, J.-H., Kou, C., Ren, Q., & Lu, Y.-Y. (2019) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0682-x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Onishi, Y., Teramoto, A., Tsujimoto, M., Tsukamoto, T., Saito, K., Toyama, H., Imaizumi, K., & Fujita, H. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-019-02092-z · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Haq, A. U., Li, J., Agbley, B. L. Y., Khan, A., Khan, I. U., Uddin, M. I., & Khan, S. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3171663 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Barile, B., Marzullo, A., Stamile, C., Durand‐Dubief, F., & Sappey‐Marinier, D. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106113 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
COVID-19 detection from CT scans using a two-stage framework
Basu, A., Sheikh, K. H., Cuevas, E., & Sarkar, R. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116377 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Automated Chest CT Image Segmentation of COVID-19 Lung Infection based on 3D U-Net
Müller, D., Rey, I. S., & Kramer, F. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2021.100681 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Mayya, V., Kamath, S. S., Kulkarni, U., Surya, D. K., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03490-8 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Mass Image Synthesis in Mammogram with Contextual Information Based on GANs
Shen, T., Hao, K., Gou, C., & Wang, F. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106019 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Improving Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Detection in Eye Fundus Images
Araújo, T., Aresta, G., Mendonça, L. S., Penas, S. C., Maia, C., Carneiro, Â. M., Mendonça, A. M., & Campilho, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3028960 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): A Proposal for Computed Tomography Screening
Manos, D., Seely, J. M., Taylor, J. L., et al. (2014) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1016/j.carj.2014.03.004 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Tufail, A. B., Ullah, I., Khan, W. U., Asif, M., Ahmad, I., Ma, Y., Khan, R., Kalimullah, & Ali, M. S. (2021) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2021/6013448 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Kossen, T., Subramaniam, P., Madai, V. I., Hennemuth, A., Hildebrand, K., Hilbert, A., Sobesky, J., Livne, M., Galinović, I., Khalil, A. A., et al. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104254 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Singh, L. K., Pooja, Garg, H., & Khanna, M. (2022) · Evolving Systems · doi:10.1007/s12530-022-09426-4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
COVID-19 detection from lung CT-scan images using transfer learning approach
Halder, A., & Datta, B. (2021) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abf22c · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Fidon, L., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72087-2_18 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Ju, L., Wang, X., Zhao, X., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3056395 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
CNN Based Fundus Images Classification For Glaucoma Identification
Shyamalee, T., & Meedeniya, D. (2022) · International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing (ICARC) · doi:10.1109/icarc54489.2022.9754171 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Automated Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Deep Learning and Data Augmentation on Chest CTPreprint
Hu, R., Ruan, G., Xiang, S., Huang, M., Liang, Q., & Li, J. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.04.24.20078998 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation with Scale Attention Network
Yuan, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72084-1_26 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
MSG-GAN Based Synthesis of Brain MRI with Meningioma for Data Augmentation
Deepak, S., & Ameer, P. M. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT) · doi:10.1109/conecct50063.2020.9198672 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Diagnosis of breast cancer for modern mammography using artificial intelligence
Karthiga, R., Narasimhan, K., & Amirtharajan, R. (2022) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2022.05.038 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Patchless Multi-Stage Transfer Learning for Improved Mammographic Breast Mass Classification
Ayana, G., Park, J., & Choe, S. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051280 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
MM-GAN: 3D MRI Data Augmentation for Medical Image Segmentation via Generative Adversarial Networks
Sun, Y., Yuan, P., & Sun, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG) · doi:10.1109/icbk50248.2020.00041 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Toda, R., Teramoto, A., Tsujimoto, M., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-021-02308-1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Lin, M., Hou, B., Liu, L., Gordon, M. O., Kass, M. A., Wang, F., Tassel, S. H. V., & Peng, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17753-4 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Breast Cancer Detection Using GAN for Limited Labeled Dataset
Desai, S. D., Giraddi, S. G., Verma, N., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn49253.2020.9242551 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Realistic Lung Nodule Synthesis With Multi-Target Co-Guided Adversarial Mechanism
Wang, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3077089 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A data augmentation method for fully automatic brain tumor segmentation
Wang, Y., Ji, Y., & Xiao, H. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106039 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Nishio, M., Muramatsu, C., Noguchi, S., Nakai, H., Fujimoto, K., Sakamoto, R., & Fujita, H. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104032 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Li, Z., Guo, C., Nie, D., et al. (2021) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01715-7 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Cascaded 3D UNet architecture for segmenting the COVID-19 infection from lung CT volume
Aswathy, A. L., & S, V. C. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06931-z · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A deep learning approach for brain tumor detection using magnetic resonance imaging
Nayan, A.-A., Mozumder, A. N., Haque, M., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v13i1.pp1039-1047 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Dodia, S. J., Annappa, B., & Mahesh, P. A. (2021) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.22636 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Novel Data Augmentation Method Using Style-Based GAN for Robust Pulmonary Nodule Segmentation
Shi, H., Lu, J., & Zhou, Q. (2020) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc49329.2020.9164303 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Generative Data Augmentation for Diabetic Retinopathy Classification
Lim, G., Thombre, P., Lee, M. L., et al. (2020) · Proceedings - International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, TAI · doi:10.1109/ictai50040.2020.00167 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
On Mode Collapse in Generative Adversarial Networks
Zhang, K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86340-1_45 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
DCGANs for realistic breast mass augmentation in x-ray mammography
Alyafi, B., Díaz, O., & Martí, R. (2020) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis · doi:10.1117/12.2543506 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Improving the performance of lung nodule classification by fusing structured and unstructured data
Tang, N., Zhang, R., Wei, Z., Chen, X., Li, G., Song, Q., Yi, D., & Wu, Y. (2022) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.07.019 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Xie, L., Chen, Z., Sheng, X., et al. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105972 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Tandon, R., Agrawal, S., Chang, A., & Band, S. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.894920 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Revisiting segmentation of lung tumors from CT images
Farheen, F., Shamil, M. S., Ibtehaz, N., et al. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105385 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Ueda, D., Yamamoto, A., Onoda, N., Takashima, T., Noda, S., Kashiwagi, S., Morisaki, T., Fukumoto, S., Shiba, M., Morimura, M., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265751 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Analysis of Adversarial based Augmentation for Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Grading
Balasubramanian, R., Sowmya, V., Gopalakrishnan, E. A., Menon, V., Variyar, V. V. S., & Soman, K. P. (2020) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt49239.2020.9225684 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Data Analysis of the Lung Imaging Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative
Wang, W., Luo, J., Yang, X., et al. (2015) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.004 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Robust Retinal Vessel Segmentation from a Data Augmentation Perspective
Sun, X., Fang, H., Yang, Y., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87000-3_20 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Computer‐aided diagnosis of cataract severity using retinal fundus images and deep learning
Yadav, J. K. P. S., & Yadav, S. K. (2022) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/coin.12518 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Mahmood, T., Li, J., Pei, Y., Akhtar, F., Jia, Y., & Khand, Z. H. (2021) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00291 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Breast cancer: Classification of suspicious regions in digital mammograms based on capsule network
Soulami, K. B., Kaabouch, N., & Saidi, M. N. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103696 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A framework for in-vivo human brain tumor detection using image augmentation and hybrid features
Jha, M., Gupta, R., & Saxena, R. (2022) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1007/s13755-022-00193-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Synthesizing lesions using contextual GANs improves breast cancer classification on mammogramsPreprint
Wu, E., Wu, K., & Lotter, W. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00086 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, Y., Kwak, H. S., & Oh, I.-S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12052288 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Survey: Image Mixing and Deleting for Data AugmentationPreprint
Naveed, H., Anwar, S., Hayat, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07085 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Sabani, A., Landsmann, A., Hejduk, P., et al. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12071564 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Multiclass Convolution Neural Network for Classification of COVID-19 CT Images
Ching, S. L. W., Lai, K. W., Chuah, J. H., et al. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/9167707 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Perancangan Jaringan Local Area Network sebagai Monitoring Pembelajaran di Laboratorium Komputer
Rio, R., & Hari, H. (2022) · Intellect Indonesian Journal of Learning and Technological Innovation · doi:10.57255/intellect.v1i1.9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Agustin, T., Utami, E., & Fatta, H. A. (2020) · International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) · doi:10.1109/icoiact50329.2020.9332019 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quintana-Quintana, O. J., León-Cuevas, A. D., González-Gutiérrez, A., Gorrostieta-Hurtado, E., & Tovar‐Arriaga, S. (2022) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi13060823 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ramya, J., Rajakumar, M. P., & Maheswari, B. U. (2022) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-021-00534-2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Tandon, R., Agrawal, S., Raghuwanshi, R., et al. (2022) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1076-0_9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Detection and Weak Segmentation of Masses in Gray-Scale Breast Mammogram Images Using Deep Learning
Kim, Y. J., & Kim, K. G. (2022) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.s63 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Two-fold brain tumor segmentation using fuzzy image enhancement and DeepBrainet2.0
Chaki, J. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13014-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Automated Detection of Malarial Retinopathy Using Transfer Learning
Kurup, A. R., Solíz, P., Nemeth, S. C., et al. (2020) · IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (SSIAI) · doi:10.1109/ssiai49293.2020.9094595 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Dufumier, B., Gori, P., Battaglia, I., Victor, J., Grigis, A., & Duchesnay, É. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.01132 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A Memory-efficient Deep Framework for Multi-Modal MRI-based Brain Tumor Segmentation
Hashemi, N., Masoudnia, S., Nejad, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871726 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
High-level Features in Deeper Deep Learning Layers for Breast Cancer Classification
Razali, N. F., Isa, I. S., Sulaiman, S. N., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering · doi:10.1109/iccsce52189.2021.9530911 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
EEF-Net: An Enhanced EfficientNet for Breast Tumor Classification in MammogramsPreprint
Padalia, D., Vora, K., Mehta, D., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4220435 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-Supervised Deep Learning to Enhance Breast Cancer Detection on Screening MammographyPreprint
Miller, J. D., Arasu, V. A., Pu, A. X., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08812 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Asia AO, Zhu CZ, Althubiti SA, Al-Alimi D, Xiao YL, Ouyang PB, Al-Qaness MA (2020) Detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus images using cnn classification models. Electronics 11:1–20
- Bakas S, Reyes M, Jakab A, Bauer S, Rempfler M, Crimi A, Shinohara RT, Berger C, Ha SM, Rozycki M, Prastawa M (2018) Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge. arXiv preprint, pp 1–49. arXiv:1811.02629 · arXiv
- Dorizza A (2021) Data augmentation approaches for polyp segmentation. Dissertation, Universita Degli Studi Di Padova
- Müller D, Soto-Rey I, Kramer F (2021) Robust chest CT image segmentation of COVID-19 lung infection based on limited data. Inf Med Unlocked 25:1–11
- Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27:1–9
- Tyler ME, Hubbard LD, Boydston K, Pugliese AJ (2009) Characteristics of digital fundus camera systems affecting tonal resolution in color retinal images. J Ophthalmic Photogr 31:1–9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, T., Hafiz, M. S., Jim, J. R., Kabir, M. M., & Mridha, M. F. (2024) · Healthcare Analytics · doi:10.1016/j.health.2024.100340 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Gan-based data augmentation to improve breast ultrasound and mammography mass classification
Jiménez-Gaona, Y., Carrión-Figueroa, D., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106255 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Variational Autoencoders for Data Augmentation in Clinical Studies
Papadopoulos, D., & Karalis, V. D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13158793 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Brain tumour segmentation framework with deep nuanced reasoning and Swin‐T
Yang, X., Yu, K., Qi, G., et al. (2024) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.13048 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Advancements in AI-Driven detection and localisation of solar panel defects
Ghahremani, A., Adams, S. D., Norton, M., Khoo, S., & Kouzani, A. Z. (2025) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.103104 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Singh, L. K., Khanna, M., Thawkar, S., & Singh, R. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15175-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“In order to segment and categorize retinal fundus pictures for the diagnosis of glaucoma, this research offers a computer approach [40].”
MethodA Recent Survey of Vision Transformers for Medical Image Segmentation
Khan, A., Rauf, Z., Khan, A. R., Rathore, S., Khan, S. H., Shah, N. S., Farooq, U., Asif, H., Asif, A., Zahoora, U., et al. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3618215 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Current trends to mitigate these include data augmentation, synthetic data generation, and advanced training techniques like self-supervised learning to make the models more robust [189], [190], [191], [192], [193].”
Colon cancer diagnosis by means of explainable deep learning
Giammarco, M. D., Martinelli, F., Santone, A., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63659-8 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
A multi-stage deep learning approach for comprehensive lung disease classification from x-ray images
Deepak, G. D., & Bhat, S. K. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127220 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Detecting severity of Diabetic Retinopathy from fundus images: A transformer network-based review
Karkera, T. M., Adak, C., Chattopadhyay, S., & Saqib, M. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127991 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Deep networks are data-hungry, and several augmentations have been applied to address diverse issues associated with deep networks [43], including model overfitting, and to enhance the robustness of the models.”
BackgroundHuman skin type classification using image processing and deep learning approaches
Saiwaeo, S., Arwatchananukul, S., Mungmai, L., et al. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21176 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Weng, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., & Dening, T. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102263 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Naz, H. U., Nijhawan, R., Ahuja, N. J., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3327900 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“However, the application of deep learning in this context is hindered by the availability of small or insufficiently annotated sample datasets [5].”
BackgroundMethodLou, M., Ying, H., Liu, X., Zhou, H.-Y., Zhang, Y., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107228 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Deep Learning-Driven Automatic Segmentation of Weeds and Crops in UAV Imagery
Tao, J., Qiao, Q., Song, J., et al. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25216576 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Fang, K., Zhang, Y., Du, S., & He, J. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107372 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Yurtsever, M. M. E., Atay, Y., Arslan, B., & Sağıroğlu, Ş. (2024) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02699-6 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Additionally, data augmentation can help to address class imbalance issues by generating synthetic samples for underrepresented classes, thereby improving the overall performance of the models [24].”
BackgroundJeon, S., Kim, S. H., Heo, G., Heo, H. J., Chae, S. Y., Kwon, Y. W., Lee, S. K., Han, D., Kim, H., Kim, Y. H., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202509658 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zhao, Q., Yang, L., & Lyu, N. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122056 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
HI-MViT: A lightweight model for explainable skin disease classification based on modified MobileViT
Ding, Y., Yi, Z., Li, M., Long, J., Lei, S., Guo, Y., Fan, P., Zuo, C., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231207197 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Li, J., Tao, R., Chen, R., Chen, Y., Zhao, C., & Huang, X. (2024) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110209 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Attallah, O. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105064 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gao, H., Wan, Y., Xu, H., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3527061 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“3) Data Augmentation: Data augmentation [30] is a key approach for overcoming overfitting in small datasets.”
Zhu, A.-Q., Wang, Q., Shi, Y.-L., Ren, W.-W., Cao, X., Ren, T.-T., Wang, J., Zhang, Y.-Q., Sun, Y.-K., Chen, X.-W., et al. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102391 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Zhou, C. R., Liu, C., Liao, Z., Pang, Y., & Sun, W. (2024) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ad8966 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…of medical images by altering their contrast, brightness, and sharpness Currently, image enhancement techniques are widely applied to different body parts such as the brain, lungs, chest, and eyes, as well as various imaging diagnostic technologies including MRI, CT, and mammogram [ 28, 30].”
LCAMix: Local-and-contour aware grid mixing based data augmentation for medical image segmentation
Sun, D., Dornaika, F., & Charafeddine, J. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102484 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Stroke Lesion Segmentation and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review
Malik, M., Chong, B., Fernandez, J., Shim, V., Kasabov, N. K., & Wang, A. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11010086 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Deep learning models require a lot of labelled data to learn real-world patterns accurately; however, labelled medical imaging data are scarce for various reasons, including but not limited to privacy issues and domain expertise required to label the data [87].”
BackgroundKnoedler, L., Knoedler, S. A., Allam, O., Remy, K., Miragall, M. F., Safi, A., Alfertshofer, M. G., Pomahač, B., & Kauke‐Navarro, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1266399 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“…augmentation techniques such as fl ipping (i.e., horizontally or vertically mirroring an image or data point), shearing (i.e., distorting the image by tilting it in a speci fi c direction), or color channel shifting (i.e., altering the intensity of individual color channels in the image) (56, 57).”
MethodMUCM-Net: a Mamba powered UCM-Net for skin lesion segmentation
Yuan, C., Zhao, D., & Agaian, S. С. (2024) · Exploration of Medicine · doi:10.37349/emed.2024.00250 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kojok, Z. E., Khansa, H. A., Trad, F. S., & Chehab, A. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109446 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Yixin, Z., Yang, L., Guofan, J., et al. (2025) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2025.122074 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ayana, G., Lee, E., & Choe, S. (2023) · American Journal Of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.11.015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of cerebral infarcts on diffusion MRI
Ryu, W., Schellingerhout, D., Park, J.-H., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-91032-w · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“However, recent studies have demonstrated that segmentation algorithms built on datasets with a small number of original images, augmented to thousands of diverse variations, can achieve strong performance 36,37 .”
Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends
Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, H., Lin, C. X., Shuai, J., Wu, Y., Ma, L., Hu, X., Wu, M. H., Wang, J., et al. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70247 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“To this end, data augmentation techniques can be used to improve the learning and generalization capabilities of deep networks [294–297].”
ODFormer: Semantic fundus image segmentation using Transformer for optic nerve head detection
Wang, J., Mao, Y.-A., Ma, X., et al. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102533 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“It should be noted here that although there are various augmentation methods, they should be chosen according to image characteristics and applied care-fully with appropriate parameters to increase the reliability and robustness of the methods [45, 46, 47].”
MethodZhang, J., Zhang, F., & Wei, H. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111005 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Deep Learning Approaches for Chest Radiograph Interpretation: A Systematic Review
Iqbal, H., Khan, A., Nepal, N., Khan, F. N., & Moon, Y.-K. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13234688 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Das, I., Sheakh, M. A., Abdulla, S., Tahosin, M. S., Hassan, M. M., Zaman, S., & Shukla, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3607639 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Many prior studies have successfully employed similar augmentation ranges, validating their efficacy in medical imaging tasks [51].”
Chamarthi, S., Fogelberg, K., Brinker, T. J., Niebling, J., & Niebling, J. (2023) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2023.101430 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
HSMix: Hard and soft mixing data augmentation for medical image segmentation
Sun, D.-Y., Dornaika, F., & Barrena, N. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102741 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Data augmentation [9] can address data scarcity and overfitting problems by generating more training samples [10].”
Ilyas, T., Ahmad, K., Arsa, D. M. S., Jeong, Y. C., & Kim, H. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108055 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Novel hybrid transfer neural network for wheat crop growth stages recognition using field images
Naseer, A., Amjad, M., Raza, A., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96332-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Haider, S. A., Prabha, S., Gomez-Cabello, C. A., Borna, S., Pressman, S. M., Genovese, A., Trabilsy, M., Galvao, A., Aziz, K. T., Murray, P. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14072136 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Prezja, F., Annala, L., Kiiskinen, S., & Ojala, T. (2023) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17010008 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Often, the choice of augmentation techniques relies heavily on informal recommendations or generic best practices that aren’t always tailored to medical images’ unique challenges and characteristics 51 .”
InfluentialAutomatic Lung Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images Using SAM With Prompts From YOLO
Khalili, E., Priego, B., León‐Jiménez, A., & Morillo, D. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3454188 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Although the performance of the proposed approach was slightly lower than the InvertedNet CNN (97.6% Dice Score and 95.5% IoU) [39], it was still competitive.”
MethodInfluentialComposto, A., Privitera, L., Riva, M., Ardini, B., Manzoni, C., Riva, M., Aquilina, K., Valentini, G., & Giuliani, S. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Optics · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.30.s2.s23909 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“107,108 Although research in remote sensing has demonstrated the ability of such algorithms to generate accurate hyperspectral images, 91,109 – 111 their direct applicability to the medical domain and capacity to generate reliably annotated HSI datasets remains to be fully determined.”
GR-m6A: Prediction of N6-methyladenosine sites in mammals with molecular graph and residual network
Qiu, S., Liu, R., & Liang, Y. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107202 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Marullo, G., Ulrich, L., Antonaci, F. G., Audisio, A., Aprato, A., Massè, A., & Vezzetti, E. (2024) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101801 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…obtained through rotation, vertical and horizontal flipping and thus did not transform in contrast and brightness, and from the images obtained through the other transformations whose new luminosity and contrast was between the 25th and 75th percentile of the actual training images (Goceri, 2023).”
BackgroundPeter, O. O. E., Adeniran, O., John-Otumu, A. M., Khalifa, F., & Rahman, M. M. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18030155 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Berne, J. V., Saadi, S. B., Oliveira‐Santos, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Salem, H., Elbaz, M., Soliman, R. S., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-11955-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Dataset of chilli and onion plant leaf images for classification and detection
Aishwarya, M. P., & Reddy, A. P. (2024) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110524 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Image data has been increased using augmentation technique such as rotating, flipping, zooming and shearing to artificially increase the diversity of the dataset, thereby improving the robustness, generalization, and applicability of models and algorithms trained on these datasets [ 8 ].”
MethodHybrid augmentation for multi-channel deep learning in guava leaf disease detection
Güler, O., Etem, T., & Teke, M. (2025) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2025.103716 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Waqas, M., Hasan, S., Ghori, A. F., et al. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2025.103878 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“7 These models require large high quality datasets for effective training, but the scarcity of medical data, caused by factors such as privacy concerns, limited data sharing between organizations, and high storage costs, poses a major barrier to the adoption of modern machine learning tools in…”
Wang, Z., Chen, L., Xie, X., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2025.3605162 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Unlike some SDG techniques [4], [14] that focus on complex model structures, data augmentation techniques [15] are more versatile, as they can be applied to a wider range of scenarios due to their orthogonality to model architectures.”
Deng, K., Xing, L., Wu, H., Ma, H., Ling, Y., & Gao, J. (2025) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00302-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Currently, the mainstream application of grayscale images is medical imaging, particularly in the field of radiology (Kelkar et al. 2023; Goceri 2023), such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs, which are widely used for diagnosing various medical conditions and assessing the internal structures of the…”
Lu, J., Tong, X., Wu, H., Liu, Y., Ouyang, H., & Zeng, Q. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20186 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A CRNN‐based method for Chinese ship license plate recognition
Xu, F., Chen, C., Shang, Z., et al. (2023) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12949 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Bougourzi, F., Dornaika, F., Nakib, A., & Ahmed, A. T. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10717-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“In the last decade, Deep Leaning (DL) approaches have become the dominant trend in many machine learning and computer vision tasks (Van der Velden et al. 2022; Bougourzi et al. Apr. 2022; Goceri 2023).”
A Novel Data Augmentation Method for Radiomics Analysis Using Image Perturbations
Iacono, F. L., Maragna, R., Pontone, G., & Corino, V. (2024) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01013-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…by class unbalance or lack of data: the reasons of these issues lie in the low prevalence of some diseases, poor medical equipment or resources, difficulties in obtaining images that meet specific, or issues related to the complex and time-consuming tasks of image labeling and segmentation [15].”
BackgroundNikpasand, M., Middendorf, J. M., Ella, V. A., Jones, K. E., Ladd, B. M., Takahashi, T., Barocas, V. H., & Ellingson, A. M. (2024) · JOR Spine · doi:10.1002/jsp2.1353 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Huang, J., Wu, Y., Wang, F., Fang, Y., Yang, N., Alkan, C., Abraham, D. P., Liao, C., Xu, L., Gao, Z., et al. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2024.3485022 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“(a) Model development: One effective strategy is the use of (a.i) data augmentation [199] methods for model training.”
BackgroundYue, G., Ma, X., Li, W., An, Z., & Yang, C. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107140 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
BSDA: Bayesian Random Semantic Data Augmentation for Medical Image Classification
Zhu, Y., Cai, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24237511 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Deep learning methods can assist clinicians in rapid examination and accurate diagnosis [1].”
Shen, Y., Chen, L., Liu, J., Chen, H., Wang, C., Ding, H., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102490 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Kababji, S. E., Mitsakakis, N., Jonker, E., Beltran-Bless, A.-A., Pond, G. R., Vandermeer, L., Radhakrishnan, D., Mosquera, L., Paterson, A. H. G., Shepherd, L. E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/66821 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Augmentation through simulation can be a potential solution when there are insufficient data and is a common practice for imaging data [23-25] and time series data [26,27].”
Hybrid CNN-Based Transfer Learning Enhances Brain Tumor Classification on MRI Images
Prayogo, R. D., Hamid, N., & Nambo, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3584376 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“A range of medical imaging technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been utilized to identify brain abnormalities [4].”
Gidado, M. J., Gunny, A. A. N., Gopinath, S. C. B., Devi, M., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2026) · Journal of Stored Products Research · doi:10.1016/j.jspr.2026.102959 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Deep learning-based efficient diagnosis of periapical diseases with dental X-rays
Wang, K., Zhang, S., Wei, Z., Fang, X., Liu, F., Han, M., & Du, M. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105061 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
RADAP: A Robust and Adaptive Defense Against Diverse Adversarial Patches on face recognition
Liu, X., Shen, F., Zhao, J. Y., et al. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110915 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Dai, G., Wang, C., Dai, D., et al. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103446 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Qian, X., Shao, H., Li, Y., Lu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.17757 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nimmy, S. F., Hussain, O. K., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Saha, S. (2025) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113333 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Qiang, Y.-R., Zhou, Q.-Y., Li, J.-N., Xie, M.-Y., Cui, X., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127720 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Lightweight CNN for Multiclass Retinal Disease Screening with Explainable AI
Arnob, A. K. B., Chayon, M. H. R., Farid, F. A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging11080275 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Goceri et al. [28] emphasized that the performance of the augmentation techniques is dependent on the disease and imaging method and, thus, needs to be selected accordingly in order to provide excellent performance.”
Hybrid CNN-transformer network for interactive learning of challenging musculoskeletal images
Bi, L., Buehner, U., Fu, X., Williamson, T., Choong, P., & Kim, J. (2023) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107875 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Aktas, B., Ates, D. D., Düzyel, O., & Gümüş, A. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-024-02485-w · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Data scarcity often leads to a negative result in model performance, at which point classical data augmentation methods step in such as rotation, flipping, cropping, brightness, and contrast adjustment [40].”
Deep Learning for Detecting Dental Plaque and Gingivitis From Oral Photographs: A Systematic Review
Moharrami, M., Vahab, E., Bagherianlemraski, M., Hemmati, G., Singhal, S., Quiñonez, C., Schwendicke, F., & Glogauer, M. (2025) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.70001 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Furthermore, if a model is underfitting, demonstrated by consistently high bias on the training set, then increasing the sample size is unlikely to improve performance [90, 91].”
Cho, J., Woo, S., Hwang, S. H., Kim, S., Lee, H., Hwang, J.-Y., Kim, J.-W., Kim, M. S., Smith, L., Lee, S., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-0355 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Understanding the robustness of vision-language models to medical image artefacts
Cheng, Z., Ong, A. Y., Wagner, S. K., Merle, D. A., Ju, L., Zhang, H., Chen, R., Pang, L., Li, B., He, T., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02108-w · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“In certain cases, MedGemma ’ s fi nal output diverges from the reasoning it presents, with an example of this discrepancy shown in Supplementary Data 13.”
InfluentialChang, J., & Hatfield, B. S. (2024) · Advances in cancer research · doi:10.1016/bs.acr.2024.05.006 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
EffSVMNet: An efficient hybrid neural network for improved skin disease classification
Sharma, Y., Tiwari, N. K., & Upaddhyay, V. K. (2024) · Smart Health · doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2024.100520 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wang, S., Zhao, Z.-A., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies13010028 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Dual-Stream CoAtNet models for accurate breast ultrasound image segmentation
Zaidkilani, N., García, M. Á., & Puig, D. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-09963-w · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Although different augmentation techniques have been applied to overcome different issues caused by deep networks [39–41], efficient augmentation methods must be properly chosen according to the characteristics of the images.”
SkinHealthMate app: An AI-powered digital platform for skin disease diagnosis
Aboulmira, A., Lachgar, M., Hrimech, H., Camara, A., Elbahja, C., Elmansouri, A., & Hassini, Y. (2024) · Systems and Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.sasc.2024.200166 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Moon, J., Jadhav, P., & Choi, S. T. (2025) · Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.4078/jrd.2024.0128 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“While DL models traditionally required large datasets, advancements such as transfer learning and data augmentation have made it possible to train models with smaller amounts of data [139,140].”
Segmentation of lungs from chest X-ray images based on Deep Atrous Attention UNet (DAA-UNet) model
Yadav, V. K., & Singhai, J. (2025) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-025-03344-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“To increase the number of images in the resultant datasets, image augmentation techniques such as random rotation by 45°, 90°, and flipping in the horizontal and vertical directions were applied to each original image, as suggested in the literature [34].”
A hybrid parallel convolutional spiking neural network for enhanced skin cancer detection
Kumar, K. A., & Vanmathi, C. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-85627-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Liu, X., Ono, K., & Bise, R. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105056 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Alasmari, H., Amoudi, G., & Alghamdi, H. S. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15182301 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The techniques we used are as follows [35]:”
Jia, J., Cao, X., & Wei, Z. (2023) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/0113892029270191231013111911 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Second, different data enhancement techniques [69-71] used in deep network models can be referenced and tried to be used to study ac4C site prediction.”
Li, P., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, K., & Wang, C. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3387541 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“These algorithms must be carefully matched to the specific characteristics of the images and the classification task at hand, as highlighted in references [29] and [30].”
BackgroundLiu, C., Xiu, C., Zou, Y., et al. (2024) · Spectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.saa.2024.125353 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
He, K., Zhu, J., Li, L., et al. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40350 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Shoushtari, F. K., Dehkordi, A. N. V., & Sina, S. (2024) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-024-03461-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gomaa, M. M., elabdeen, A. G. Z., Elnashar, A., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-024-01830-0 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Data augmentation (DA) is a typical solution to this problem, and numerous augmentation techniques have been applied to various types of photos [4].”
Zhao, J., Jiang, T., Lin, Y., Chan, L.-C., Ping Keung, C. H. A. N., Wen, C., & Chen, H. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3372576 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“It is known that deep networks are data-hungry and several augmentation methods [54], [55], [56] have been applied to improve the performance and increase the reliability and robustness of the neural networks.”
MethodDiagnosing Cataracts in the Digital Age: A Survey on AI, Metaverse, and Digital Twin Applications
Jones, A., Vijayan, T. B., & John, S. (2024) · Seminars in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1080/08820538.2024.2403436 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“12”
Mennemann, K., Ebert, N., Reichardt, L., et al. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15031260 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Chong, L., Cao, T., Tang, M., Pu, W., & Lei, P. (2025) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112060 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goceri, E.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence Review
- Published
- 2023-03-20
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 12561-12605
- ISSN
- 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7462
- PMC
- PMC10027281
- OpenAlex
- W4327909703
- Semantic Scholar
- da92fa7949632062a3eb57bdfe6244227cba28be
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 116 · 2025: 200 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 28
- FWCI
- 18.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
- Keywords
- medical image classification, data scarcity, overfitting, data bias, neuroimaging, lung imaging, breast imaging, ocular imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, CT, mammography, fundus examination, imaging modalities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review