Cited by 155Retinal Imaging and AnalysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisRetinal Diseases and Treatments

DR-GAN: Conditional Generative Adversarial Network for Fine-Grained Lesion Synthesis on Diabetic Retinopathy Images

Open access
Zhou, Yi, Wang, Boyang, He, Xiaodong, Cui, Shanshan, Shao, Ling·2022·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a complication of diabetes that severely affects eyes. It can be graded into five levels of severity according to international protocol. However, optimizing a grading model to have strong generalizability requires a large amount of balanced training data, which is difficult to collect, particularly for the high severity levels. Typical data augmentation methods, including random flipping and rotation, cannot generate data with high diversity. In this paper, we propose a diabetic retinopathy generative adversarial network (DR-GAN) to synthesize high-resolution fundus images which can be manipulated with arbitrary grading and lesion information. Thus, large-scale generated data can be used for more meaningful augmentation to train a DR grading and lesion segmentation model. The proposed retina generator is conditioned on the structural and lesion masks, as well as adaptive grading vectors sampled from the latent grading space, which can be adopted to control the synthesized grading severity. Moreover, a multi-scale spatial and channel attention module is devised to improve the generation ability to synthesize small details. Multi-scale discriminators are designed to operate from large to small receptive fields, and joint adversarial losses are adopted to optimize the whole network in an end-to-end manner. With extensive experiments evaluated on the EyePACS dataset connected to Kaggle, as well as the FGADR dataset, we validate the effectiveness of our method, which can both synthesize highly realistic ( 1280 ×1280) controllable fundus images and contribute to the DR grading task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2020.3045475

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16][16] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, 'Generative adversarial nets,' in NeurIPS , 2014, pp. 2672-2680. -
  2. [17][17] A. Radford, L. Metz, and S. Chintala, 'Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generativeadversarial networks,' in ICLR , 2016. -
  3. [42][42] L. v. d. Maaten and G. Hinton, 'Visualizing data using t-sne,' Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 9, no. Nov, pp. 2579-2605, 2008. -
  4. [48][48] K. Shmelkov, C. Schmid, and K. Alahari, 'How good is my gan?' in ECCV , September 2018. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Y., Wang, B., He, X., Cui, S., & Shao, L.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Inception Institute of Artificial Intelligence (AE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2022-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
56-66
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2998240002
Cited by
155
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, conditional generative adversarial networks, diabetic retinopathy grading, data augmentation, lesion segmentation, multi-scale attention, multi-scale discriminator, EyePACS
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Retina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review