Cited by 14Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Policy and ManagementChild Welfare and Adoption

State Strategies for Enhancing Access and Quality in Systems of Care for Youth with Complex Behavioral Health Needs

Graaf, Genevieve, Snowden, Lonnie·2021·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

The investigators conducted a qualitative study with state administrators and policymakers about the financing and policies that structure public systems of care for children with complex behavioral healthcare needs. The objective was to characterize diverse strategies states employed to enhance funding for, access to, and quality and effectiveness of home and community-based services (HCBS) for these youth. States report using a wide variety of creative solutions while navigating the unique needs and constraints of their political and economic environments. Findings can benefit public officials, researchers, and advocates by advancing knowledge-sharing of public policy-making and resourceful problem-solving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-020-01061-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State mental health agencies, Medicaid authorities, and insurance market governing bodies can play an important role in the extent to which care coordination services are covered for children in their state and the adequacy of reimbursement rates for these services.

    “State mental health agencies, Medicaid authorities, and insurance market governing bodies can play an important role in the extent to which these services are covered for children in their state and the adequacy of reimbursement rates for these services (Graaf & Snowden, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graaf, G., & Snowden, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Graaf, Genevieve
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2020-07-07
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
185-200
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W3041363860
Cited by
14
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
systems of care, home and community-based services, state policy, government funding, health care access, quality of care, child and adolescent mental health, state administrators, problem-solving strategies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Policy Making, Psychiatry, United States, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review