Cited by 9Family Caregiving in Mental IllnessMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health services

Behavioral Health Services Outcomes That Matter Most to Caregivers of Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Mental Health Needs

Open access
Graaf, Genevieve, Kitchens, Katherine, Sweeney, Millie, Thomas, Kathleen C.·2024·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

This project documents the service outcomes that caregivers value most. A diverse group of caregivers, representing six regions of the United States, participated in two rounds of virtual one-hour focus groups. In round 1, participants identified what they hoped to gain from using behavioral health services for themselves, their families, and their child and discussed what made services a positive experience for them. They then reported their top-three most-hoped-for outcomes. In round 2, groups validated and refined summary findings from round 1. Caregivers prioritized service quality outcomes, primarily. They expressed a desire for an accessible, respectful, and supportive treatment environment, underpinned by well-trained and culturally responsive professionals. Caregivers also desire seamless cross-sector provider collaboration and care transitions, which integrate the insights and preferences of families and children themselves to craft a customized care plan. Priority outcomes not related to service quality included hoping to gain increased knowledge, resources, and tools and techniques to support the mental health needs of their children, to see their children improve their daily functioning and for their child develop more effective interpersonal communication skills. Caregivers also reported hoping to experience less stigma related to the mental health needs of their children and to achieve personal fulfillment for themselves and their children. Research, policies, and mental health services should prioritize and be designed to address the outcomes that matter to youth and families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph21020172

Cites

49 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graaf, G., Kitchens, K., Sweeney, M., & Thomas, K. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Family-Run Executive Director Leadership Association (FREDLA), Elliot City, MD 21042, USA
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Graaf, Genevieve
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-02-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
172
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391433535
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (#EASCS-24854, 1K01MH129991)
  • National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (#EASCS-24854, 1K01MH129991)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
caregiver perspectives, child and adolescent mental health, behavioral health services, service outcomes, service quality, intersectoral collaboration, care transitions, culturally responsive care, stigma, caregiver knowledge and skills, family-centered care, youth mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Communication, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review