Cited by 10Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Quality and Management

Sustainability of the Collaborative Chronic Care Model in Outpatient Mental Health Teams Three Years Post-Implementation: A Qualitative Analysis

Open access
Miller, Christopher J., Kim, Bo, Connolly, Samantha L., Spitzer, Elizabeth G., Brown, Madisen, Bailey, Hannah M., Weaver, Kendra, Sullivan, Jennifer L.·2023·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Our goal was to investigate the sustainability of care practices that are consistent with the collaborative chronic care model (CCM) in nine outpatient mental health teams located within US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, three to four years after the completion of CCM implementation. We conducted qualitative interviews (N = 30) with outpatient mental health staff from each of the nine teams. We based our directed content analysis on the six elements of the CCM. We found variable sustainability of CCM-based care processes across sites. Some care processes, such as delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) and use of measurement-based care (MBC) to guide clinic decision-making, were robustly maintained or even expanded within participating teams. In contrast, other care processes-which had in some cases been developed with considerable effort-had not been sustained. For example, care manager roles were diminished in scope or eliminated completely in response to workload pressures, frontline care needs, or the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, processes for engaging Veterans more fully in decision-making had generally been scaled back. Leadership support in the form of adequate team staffing and time to conduct team meetings were seen as crucial for sustaining CCM-consistent care. Given the potential impact of leadership turnover on sustainability in mental health, future efforts to implement CCM-based mental health care should strive to involve multiple leaders in implementation and sustainment efforts, lest one key departure undo years of implementation work. Our results also suggest that implementing CCM processes may best be conceptualized as a partnership across multiple levels of medical center leadership.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-022-01231-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appropriate staffing (i.e., ensuring manageable workloads) and blocking time for team members were identified as critical to sustainment of a team-based model in the VA.

    “Staff turnover contributed to discontinuity in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) team members [78], and appropriate staffing (i.e., ensuring manageable workloads) and blocking time for team members were identified as critical to sustainment of a team-based model in the VA [67].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, C. J., Kim, B., Connolly, S. L., Spitzer, E. G., Brown, M., Bailey, H. M., Weaver, K., & Sullivan, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Christopher J.
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2022-11-03
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W4308075000
Cited by
10
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI QUE 20-026)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
implementation sustainability, veterans' mental health services, care managers, measurement-based care, evidence-based psychotherapy, leadership support, leadership turnover, Department of Veterans Affairs, COVID-19 pandemic impact
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Outpatients, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review