Cited by 60Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Sciences Research and Education

Predicting the Long-Term Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health Care: An 8-Year Longitudinal Analysis

Peterson, Alison E., Bond, Gary R., Drake, Robert E., McHugo, Gregory J., Jones, Amanda M., Williams, Jessica R.·2014·The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research

Abstract

Few studies have examined predictors of long-term sustainability of evidence-based practices in mental health. This study used assessments of five evidence-based practices implemented in 49 sites in eight states at baseline and years 2, 4, and 8. Program characteristics, implementation characteristics, reinforcement activities, and sustainability factors were used to predict program survival status. The majority of predictors were not significant. Supervisor turnover in year 4 predicted survival status in year 8, but site characteristics, fidelity at implementation, quality improvement activities, and post-implementation activities had little impact on long-term program survival. This study extends previous sustainability research by examining the long-term impact of internal program factors over a substantial period of time using longitudinal prediction. Future research should also consider the influence of external factors such as financial policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11414-013-9347-x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, A. E., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Jones, A. M., & Williams, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
  • Manila Consulting Group (United States) (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Jessica R.
Venue
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Published
2013-05-25
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
337-346
ISSN
  • 1094-3412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3308
OpenAlex
W2001681776
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSS283200700040I/HHSS28342003T)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
evidence-based practice, sustainability, mental health services, program survival, implementation fidelity, quality improvement, program characteristics, long-term forecasting
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Services, Diffusion of Innovation, Forecasting, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Guideline Adherence, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review