CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 221Literary and Philosophical StudiesDigitalization, Law, and RegulationAnimal Law and Welfare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy

Solaiman, S. M.·2017·Artificial Intelligence and Law
DOI 10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Charney R (2015) Can android plead automatism? A review of when kill: artificial intelligence under the criminal law by Gabriel Hallevy. Univ Tor Fac Law Rev 73(1):69–72
  2. Demaitre E (2016) Five robotics predictions for 2016. Robotics Business Review. http://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/article/five_robotics_predictions_for_2016/medical_assistive . Accessed 19 Jan 2016
  3. Freund E (1897) The legal nature of corporations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  4. Hubbard FP (2014) “Sophisticated Robots”: balancing liability, regulation, and innovation. Fla Law Rev 66(5):1803–1872
  5. Matambanadzo SM (2012) Embodying vulnerability: a feminist theory of the person. Duke J Gend Law Policy 20:45–83
  6. Niman J (2012) In support of creating a legal definition of personhood. J Law Soc Deviance 3:142–244
  7. Nonhuman Rights Project (2015) Judge recognizes two chimpanzees as legal persons, grants them writ of habeas corpus’. Press Release, New York. http://www.nonhumanrightsproject.org/2015/04/20/judge-recognizes-two-chimpanzees-as-legal-persons-grants-them-writ-of-habeas-corpus/ . Accessed 17 Dec 2015
  8. Ripken SK (2010) Corporations are people too: a multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood puzzle. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 15:97–177
  9. Salmond JW (1916) Jurisprudence. Stevens and Haynes, London
  10. Salmond JW (1947) Jurisprudence. Sweet and Maxwell, London
  11. Sexton PA, Suroff AT, Zmijewski DR, McDowell LN (2010) Recent development in products, general liability, and consumer law. Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J 45(2):517–542
  12. Wolff M (1938) On the nature of legal persons. Law Q Rev 54(4):494–521
  13. Yesey-Fitzgfrad SG (1925) Idolon fori. Law Q Rev 41(4):419–422

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–219 of 219

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Solaiman, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Solaiman, S. M.
ORCID
Solaiman, S. M.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-11-14
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
155-179
ISSN
  • 0924-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8382
DOI
10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3
OpenAlex
W2550953130
Semantic Scholar
68f9887afdbe992e41d6eee4208ab15c2d51cdcf
Cited by
221
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
69.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health and Safety Executive
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
Keywords
legal personality, robots, industrial robots, corporate personality, idols, animal personality, personhood, liability, autonomous robots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review