The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This possibility led the European Parliament to propose”
From In support of “no-fault” civil liability rules for artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Solaiman 2017
Citations
Cites
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,445
BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice
Rao, A. S., & Georgeff, M. (1995) · Cited by 2,577
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Ballantine, H. W., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932) · California Law Review · doi:10.2307/3475545 · Cited by 1,346
Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach
Cohen, F. S. (1935) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1116300 · Cited by 832
Bryson, J. J. (2010) · Natural Language Processing · doi:10.1075/nlp.8.11bry · Cited by 455
Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data
Alemzadeh, H., Raman, J., Leveson, N., Kalbarczyk, Z., & Iyer, R. K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151470 · Cited by 441
The Essential Role of Organizational Law
Hansmann, H. B., & Kraakman, R. H. (2000) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/797521 · Cited by 407
The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach
Payne, J. (2010) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1017/s1566752910300085 · Cited by 349
Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences
Solum, L. B. (2020) · Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics · doi:10.4324/9781003074991-37 · Cited by 296
The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach
Kraakman, R. H., Armour, J. H., Davies, P. L., et al. (2009) · CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) · Cited by 272
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Charney R (2015) Can android plead automatism? A review of when kill: artificial intelligence under the criminal law by Gabriel Hallevy. Univ Tor Fac Law Rev 73(1):69–72
- Demaitre E (2016) Five robotics predictions for 2016. Robotics Business Review. http://www.roboticsbusinessreview.com/article/five_robotics_predictions_for_2016/medical_assistive . Accessed 19 Jan 2016
- Freund E (1897) The legal nature of corporations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Hubbard FP (2014) “Sophisticated Robots”: balancing liability, regulation, and innovation. Fla Law Rev 66(5):1803–1872
- Matambanadzo SM (2012) Embodying vulnerability: a feminist theory of the person. Duke J Gend Law Policy 20:45–83
- Niman J (2012) In support of creating a legal definition of personhood. J Law Soc Deviance 3:142–244
- Nonhuman Rights Project (2015) Judge recognizes two chimpanzees as legal persons, grants them writ of habeas corpus’. Press Release, New York. http://www.nonhumanrightsproject.org/2015/04/20/judge-recognizes-two-chimpanzees-as-legal-persons-grants-them-writ-of-habeas-corpus/ . Accessed 17 Dec 2015
- Ripken SK (2010) Corporations are people too: a multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood puzzle. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 15:97–177
- Salmond JW (1916) Jurisprudence. Stevens and Haynes, London
- Salmond JW (1947) Jurisprudence. Sweet and Maxwell, London
- Sexton PA, Suroff AT, Zmijewski DR, McDowell LN (2010) Recent development in products, general liability, and consumer law. Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J 45(2):517–542
- Wolff M (1938) On the nature of legal persons. Law Q Rev 54(4):494–521
- Yesey-Fitzgfrad SG (1925) Idolon fori. Law Q Rev 41(4):419–422
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y · Cited by 3,294
“All the challenges mentioned above culminate in the academic discourse about legal personality of robots 55 , which may lead to alarming narratives of technological totalitarianism.”
BackgroundOf, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons
Bryson, J. J., Diamantis, M. E., & Grant, T. D. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-017-9214-9 · Cited by 368
“It is a kind of pretense in which legal systems can decide to engage, regardless of whether an entity really is a person (See examples in Solaiman 2017, pp. 3–4).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LIMITS OF LEGAL PERSONALITY
Chesterman, S. A. (2020) · International and Comparative Law Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0020589320000366 · Cited by 285
Avatars in the metaverse: potential legal issues and remedies
Cheong, B. C. (2022) · International Cybersecurity Law Review · doi:10.1365/s43439-022-00056-9 · Cited by 183
Burton, S., Habli, I., Lawton, T., McDermid, J. A., Morgan, P., & Porter, Z. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.103201 · Cited by 172
“To solve this problem, this article does not advocate that systems should be granted full legal-personhood [10] [64] [69] as this will come with a host of other problems, such as its being able to own property, sue (as well as being sued), and have its own legal rights.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Solaiman, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Solaiman, S. M.
- ORCID
- Solaiman, S. M.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence and Law
- Published
- 2016-11-14
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-179
- ISSN
- 0924-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8382
- OpenAlex
- W2550953130
- Semantic Scholar
- 68f9887afdbe992e41d6eee4208ab15c2d51cdcf
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 69.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence and Law (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health and Safety Executive
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Literary and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Keywords
- legal personality, robots, industrial robots, corporate personality, idols, animal personality, personhood, liability, autonomous robots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review