Cited by 49Sexual function and dysfunction studiesGenital Health and DiseasePelvic floor disorders treatments

Women’s experiences of vulvodynia: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the journey toward diagnosis

Open access
Shallcross, Rebekah, Dickson, Joanne M., Nunns, David, Taylor, Kate, Kiemle, Gundi·2019·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Vulvodynia is the experience of idiopathic pain characterized by burning, soreness, or throbbing in the external female genitalia or vulva and is estimated to be experienced by 4-16% of the female population, yet only half of women seek help regarding their symptoms. Of the women who do seek help, only around 2% obtain a diagnosis. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to explore the experiences of women with vulvodynia on their journey toward diagnosis, by using semi-structured interviews and an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) methodology. Eight women were interviewed, and their experiences were analyzed and interpreted into three master themes, each with constituent sub-themes: (1) The Journey Is a Battle, (2) "What Is Vulvodynia?": Ambivalence Toward Diagnosis, and (3) Patriarchy, Women, and Sex. Overall, women perceived a healthcare system which was dismissive and shaming, with an inadequate knowledge of vulvodynia. This in turn impacted on women's psychological well-being. Psychological understanding, one-to-one therapy, and consultation and training for healthcare professionals may help to improve the psychological well-being of women with vulvodynia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-018-1246-z

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shallcross, R., Dickson, J. M., Nunns, D., Taylor, K., & Kiemle, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Kiemle, Gundi
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
961-974
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2884618421
Cited by
49
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • University of Liverpool
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Keywords
vulvodynia, women's experiences, patriarchy, shame, psychological well-being, health professions education, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Young Adult, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review