Cited by 317Sexual function and dysfunction studiesGenital Health and DiseasePelvic floor disorders treatments

Prevalence and demographic characteristics of vulvodynia in a population-based sample

Open access
Reed, Barbara Diane, Harlow, Siobán Denise, Sen, Ananda, Legocki, Laurie Jo, Edwards, Rayna Monique, Arato, Nora, Haefner, Hope Katharine·2012·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of vulvodynia among women in southeast Michigan.Study design A population-based study of adult women was conducted, using telephone recruitment and completion of a self-administered survey. Weighted estimates of vulvodynia prevalence and characteristics were determined.Results Over a year, 2542 women were recruited and 2269 (89.3%) completed the self-administered survey. The weighted prevalence of vulvodynia was 8.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.0-9.8) or approximately 101,000 women in the targeted population. Prevalence remained stable through age 70 years and declined thereafter. Among sexually active women, the prevalence was similar at all ages. Of 208 women meeting vulvodynia criteria, 101 (48.6%) had sought treatment, and only 3 (1.4%) had been diagnosed with vulvodynia (unweighted values). Previous vulvodynia symptoms had resolved in 384 women (16.9%) after a mean duration of 12.5 years.Conclusion Vulvodynia is common, although rarely diagnosed. Prevalence remains high among sexually active women of any age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.012

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, B. D., Harlow, S. D., Sen, A., Legocki, L. J., Edwards, R. M., Arato, N., & Haefner, H. K.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Reed, Barbara Diane
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
206
Issue
2
Pages
170.e1-170.e9
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029654045
Cited by
317
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Keywords
vulvodynia, prevalence, women's health, age distribution, sexual activity, treatment seeking, diagnosis, symptom resolution, Southeast Michigan
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Michigan, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review