Cited by 102Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and LearningAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Semantic anomaly detection with large language models

Open access
Elhafsi, Amine, Sinha, Rohan, Agia, Christopher, Schmerling, Edward, Nesnas, Issa A. D., Pavone, Marco·2023·Autonomous Robots

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10514-023-10132-6

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most embodied reasoning methods still rely on manual prompting to structure their reasoning processes, limiting their autonomous adaptation and generalization.

    “While these methods advance the cognitive capabilities of embodied AI, most still rely on manual prompting to structure their reasoning processes, limiting their autonomous adaptation and generalization.”

    From Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Elhafsi et al., 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elhafsi, A., Sinha, R., Agia, C., Schmerling, E., Nesnas, I. A. D., & Pavone, M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Elhafsi, Amine
Venue
Autonomous Robots
Published
2023-10-23
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1035-1055
ISSN
  • 0929-5593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7527
OpenAlex
W4387876242
Cited by
101
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 1
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autonomous Robots (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K1143, 80NSSC20M0163)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
semantic anomaly detection, large language models, autonomous driving, object manipulation, anomaly monitoring, foundation models, semantic reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review