The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic anomaly detection with large language models
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While these methods advance the cognitive capabilities of embodied AI, most still rely on manual prompting to structure their reasoning processes, limiting their autonomous adaptation and generalization.”
From Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Elhafsi et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 · Cited by 18,285
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
Teymur, O., Zygalakis, K., & Calderhead, B. (2016) · Cited by 13,881
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.001.0001 · Cited by 9,187
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471
Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.01474 · Cited by 3,666
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 1×
“Alternative to direct OOD classification, other methods seek to improve the often poorly calibrated uncertainty scores of neural networks on OOD data [30].”
MethodBDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Arjovsky, M., Bottou, L., Gulrajani, I., & Lopez-Paz, D. Invariant risk minimization. arXiv:1907.02893. · arXiv
- Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E., Lee, P., Lee, Y. T., Li, Y., Lundberg, S., et al. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. · arXiv
- Cui, Y., Niekum, S., Gupta, A., Kumar, V., & Rajeswaran, A. (2022). Can foundation models perform zero-shot task specification for robot manipulation? In Learning for dynamics and control conference (pp. 893–905). PMLR.
- Denouden, T., Salay, R., Czarnecki, K., Abdelzad, V., Phan, B., & Vernekar, S. (2018). Improving reconstruction autoencoder out-of-distribution detection with mahalanobis distance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02765. · arXiv
- Koh, P. W., et al. (Jul 2021). Wilds: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. In M. Meila, & T. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th international conference on machine learning, volume 139 of proceedings of machine learning research (pp. 5637–5664). PMLR, 18–24.
- Liu, Z., Bahety, A., & Song, S. (2023). Reflect: Summarizing robot experiences for failure explanation and correction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15724. · arXiv
- Ren, A. Z., Dixit, A., Bodrova, A., Singh, S., Tu, S., Brown, N., Xu, P., Takayama, L., Xia, F., Varley, J., et al. (2023). Robots that ask for help: Uncertainty alignment for large language model planners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01928. · arXiv
- Sharma, A., Azizan, N., & Pavone, M. (Jul 2021). Sketching curvature for efficient out-of-distribution detection for deep neural networks. In C. de Campos & M. H. Maathuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-seventh conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, volume 161 of proceedings of machine learning research (pp. 1958-1967). PMLR, 27–30.
- Sinha, R., Sharma, A., Banerjee, S., Lew, T., Luo, R., Richards, S. M, Sun, Y., Schmerling, E., & Pavone, M. (2022). A system-level view on out-of-distribution data in robotics. arXiv:2212.14020. · arXiv
- Srivastava, M., Goodman, N., & Sadigh, D. (2023). Generating language corrections for teaching physical control tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07012. · arXiv
- Yang, J., Zhou, K., Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2021). Generalized out-of-distribution detection: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11334. · arXiv
- Zeng, A., Wong, A., Welker, S., Choromanski, K., Tombari, F., Purohit, A., Ryoo, M., Sindhwani, V., Lee, J., Vanhoucke, V., et al. (2022). Socratic models: Composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00598. · arXiv
- Zong, B., Song, Q., Min, M. R., Cheng, W., Lumezanu, C., Cho, D., & Chen, H. (2018). Deep autoencoding Gaussian mixture model for unsupervised anomaly detection. In International conference on learning representations.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Studies on Cross-border Data Risks and Privacy Compliance Optimization of the Internet of Things
Hu, P., & Wang, L. (2026) · International Conference on Digital Economy and Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3845872.3845920
TiLLMeOut: Time Series Large Language Models-Based Outlier Detection
Angiulli, F., Luca, F. D., & Fassetti, F. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-41086-3_17
Metadata
- Authors
- Elhafsi, A., Sinha, R., Agia, C., Schmerling, E., Nesnas, I. A. D., & Pavone, M.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elhafsi, Amine
- Venue
- Autonomous Robots
- Published
- 2023-10-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1035-1055
- ISSN
- 0929-5593 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7527
- OpenAlex
- W4387876242
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Autonomous Robots (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC19K1143, 80NSSC20M0163)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- semantic anomaly detection, large language models, autonomous driving, object manipulation, anomaly monitoring, foundation models, semantic reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
