Cited by 76Reading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Heritability of Word Recognition in Middle-Aged Men Varies as a Function of Parental Education

Kremen, William S., Jacobson, Kristen C., Xian, Hong, Eisen, Seth A., Waterman, Brian, Toomey, Rosemary, Neale, Michael C., Tsuang, Ming T. +1 more·2005·Behavior Genetics

Abstract

Although it is of lifelong importance, reading ability is studied primarily in children and adolescents. We examined variation in word recognition in 347 middle-aged male twin pairs. Overall heritability (a2) was 0.45, and shared environmental influences (c2) were 0.28. However, parental education moderated heritability such that a2 was 0.21 at the lowest parental education level and 0.69 at the highest level; c2 was 0.52 and 0.00, respectively. This constitutes a parental education x environment interaction. The higher heritability was due to a decrease in the magnitude of shared environmental factors, rather than an increase in the magnitude of genetic factors. Other cognitive studies have reported gene x environment interactions, but patterns may differ as a function of age or specific cognitive abilities. Our results suggest that shared environmental factors in families with low parental education have long-lasting effects on word recognition ability, well beyond any critical period for developing reading proficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10519-004-3876-2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have failed to replicate the G × SES finding, including the largest sample to date.

    “Other studies, however, have failed to replicate the finding (Bartels, van Beijsterveldt, & Boomsma, 2009; Kremen et al., 2005; Soden-Hensler, 2012; van der Sluis, Willemsen, de Geus, Boomsma, & Posthuma, 2008), including the largest sample to date (Hanscombe et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Boulanger, G. (1981). Who Goes to War?. In A. Egendorf, C. Kadushin, R. S. Laufer, G. Rothbart and L. Sloan (eds.), Legacies of Vietnam: Comparative Adjustment of Veterans and Their Peers, Vol 4. Long-term Stress Reactions: Some Causes, Consequences, and Naturally Occurring Support Systems . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 494515.
  2. Eaves, L. J. (1982). The utility of twins. In V. E. Anderson, W. A. Hauser, J. K. Penry and C. F. Sing (eds.), Genetic basis of epilepsies . New York: Raven Press, pp. 249-276.
  3. Fulker, D. W. (1978). Multivariate extensions of a biometrical model of twin data. In W. E. Nance (ed.), Progress in clinical and biological research , Vol 24a, New York: Alan R. Liss.
  4. Leslie, L., and Allen, L. (1999). Factors that predict success in an early literacy intervention program. Reading Research Quarterly 34 :294-318.
  5. Neale, M. C., Boker, S., Xie, G., and Maes, H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (5th ed.). Richmond, VA: Medical College of Virginia, Department of Psychiatry.
  6. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., and Maes, H. H. (2002). Mx: Structural Modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry.
  7. Sattlier, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kremen, W. S., Jacobson, K. C., Xian, H., Eisen, S. A., Waterman, B., Toomey, R., Neale, M. C., Tsuang, M. T., & Lyons, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Kremen, William S.
Venue
Behavior Genetics
Published
2005-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
417-433
ISSN
  • 0001-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3297
OpenAlex
W2117298995
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA010586, 1 R01 AA10586)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG18386-012A2, R01AG022381, AG18386-012A1, R01AG018386)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
word recognition, reading skills, heritability, parental education, gene-environment interaction, shared environment, middle-aged men, twins, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Cognition, Dyslexia, Educational Status, Environment, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parent-Child Relations, Semantics, Inheritance Patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review