Cited by 56Fish Biology and Ecology StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesMarine and fisheries research

Age and growth of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) in the Caribbean Sea, with implications for management

Edwards, Morgan A, Frazer, Thomas K, Jacoby, Charles A·2014·Bulletin of Marine Science

Abstract

Removal efforts designed to avoid or minimize impacts from introduced lionfish, Pterois volitans (Linnaeus, 1758) and Pterois miles (Bennett, 1828), in the western Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico will be improved by reliable life history information applicable to the invaded range. For example, length at age has been modeled for lionfish from temperate North Carolina, but parameters characterizing growth are likely to differ in the tropics. Using Pterois spp. from Little Cayman, we validated formation of annual increments and daily rings in sagittal otoliths; documented ages; and estimated parameters for a length-weight relationship, multiple von Bertalanffy growth models, and an asymptotic vulnerability schedule. Formation of annuli was confirmed with marginal increment analysis, and daily ring deposition in juveniles was confirmed using an oxytetracycline hydrochloride marker. Total weight (g) estimated from combined data for both sexes was equal to 0.000003 × total length (mm)3.24. Logistic regression indicated that 50% of lionfish were vulnerable to removal at 129 mm total length. Sagittal otoliths (n = 499) from lionfish collected weekly between January and December 2011 indicated that males were 0-5 yrs old and females were 0-3 yrs old. A maximum likelihood approach to fitting von Bertalanffy equations estimated K and L 8 as 0.42 and 349 mm for the population, 0.38 and 382 mm for males, and 0.57 and 286 mm for females. An age-structured population mode…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5343/bms.2014.1022

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From age data gathered in a parallel study at Little Cayman Island, lionfish of 190 mm TL were between 0 and 2 years old.

    “From age data gathered in a parallel study at Little Cayman Island, lionfish of 190 mm TL were between 0 and 2 years old (Edwards et al., 2014)”

    From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as Edwards et al., 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, M. A., Frazer, T. K., & Jacoby, C. A.
Venue
Bulletin of Marine Science
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
953-966
ISSN
0007-4977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043569920
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund
  • Disney Conservation Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
invasive lionfish, Pterois volitans, Pterois miles, age and growth, sagittal otoliths, otolith annuli, length-weight relationship, von Bertalanffy growth, recruitment overfishing, Caribbean Sea, Little Cayman, introduced species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review