Cited by 214Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyEvolution and Science Education

The cognitive and evolutionary psychology of religion

Bulbulia, Joseph·2004·Biology & Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10539-005-5568-6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bulbulia, J.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Bulbulia, Joseph
Venue
Biology & Philosophy
Published
2004-11
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
655-686
ISSN
  • 0169-3867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8404
OpenAlex
W2081107734
Cited by
214
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biology & Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
cognitive psychology of religion, evolutionary psychology of religion, adaptationism, religious cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review