Cited by 96Cancer survivorship and careComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Yoga has a solid effect on cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Dong, Bei, Xie, Congyan, Jing, Xiuchen, Lin, Lu, Tian, Li·2019·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Purpose This study was designed to critically evaluate the effect of yoga on cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer.Methods Eight databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid-Medline, Web of Science, CBM, Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI) were systematically reviewed from inception to January 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers critically and independently assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane Collaboration criteria and extracted correlated data using the designed form. All analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3.Results A total of 17 qualified studies that included 2183 patients (yoga: 1112, control: 1071) were included in the meta-analysis. Yoga had a large effect on fatigue in post-treatment breast cancer patients and had a small effect on intra-treatment patients. The meta-analysis also indicated that supervised yoga class had a significant effect on CRF; the six-week program had a moderate beneficial effect while the 60/90 min/session supervised yoga class and the eight-week program demonstrated a large effect on fatigue in patients with breast cancer. Yoga could markedly mitigate the physical fatigue in breast cancer patients, had a medium impact on cognitive fatigue, and manifested a small effect on mental fatigue. Eight studies reported the adverse events, whereas ten studies did not.Conclusions Yoga can be considered as an alternative therapy for relieving fatigue in breast cancer patients who have completed treatment or are undergoing anti-cancer treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10549-019-05278-w

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, B., Xie, C., Jing, X., Lin, L., & Tian, L.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tian, Li
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2019-05-24
Volume
177
Issue
1
Pages
5-16
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2946713652
Cited by
96
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (18YJCZH164)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
yoga, cancer-related fatigue, breast cancer, post-treatment fatigue, program duration, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, adverse events, complementary therapy
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Patient Compliance, Time Factors, Yoga, Treatment Outcome, Publication Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review