CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Ethics in Business and EducationPsychology of Social InfluencePhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Constructivism, Mental Models, and Problems of Obedience

Werhane, Patricia H., Hartman, Laura P., Moberg, Dennis, Englehardt, Elaine, Pritchard, Michael, Parmar, Bidhan·2011·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0767-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-011-0767-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Stanford Prison experiments and Milgram's electric shock experiments show how violent people can become when immersed in an ambiguous or highly constrained situation that triggers ethics blind spots.

    “This is to say nothing of the famous Stanford Prison experiments (Zimbardo 2008) and Milgram's electric shock experiments which show how violent we can become when we are immersed in an ambiguous or highly constrained situation which triggers our 'ethics blind spots' (Werhane et al. 2011).”

    From Having Burned the Straw Man of Christian Spiritual Leadership, what can We Learn from Jesus About Leading Ethically? (2017) · cites this paper as Werhane et al. 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Adelson, B. and E. Soloway: 1985, `The Role of Domain Experience in Software Design', IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 11(11), 1351–1360 · DOI
  2. Allard, F. and J. L. Starks: 1980, `Perception in Sport: Volleyball', Journal of Sport Psychology 2, 22–33 · DOI
  3. Ariely, D.: 2008, ‘Are We in Control of Our Own Decisions?’ The Entertainment Gathering at the TED Conference (Dec.), http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/dan_ariely_asks_are_we_in_control_of_our_own_decisions.html . Accessed 28 May 2009. · DOI
  4. Bazerman, M. H. and D. Chugh: 2005, `Bounded Awareness: Focusing Failures in Negotiation', in L. Thompson (ed.), Frontiers of Social Psychology: Negotiations (Psychology Press, College Park, MD)
  5. Bazerman, M. and D. Chugh: 2006, ‘Decisions without Blinders’, Harvard Business Review Jan, 88–97.
  6. Bazerman, M. and D. Moore: 2009, Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).
  7. Bellizzi, J. A. and R. E. Hite: 1989, Supervising unethical sales force behavior, Journal of Marketing 53(2), 36–47. · DOI
  8. Bucciarelli, M. and P. N. Johnson-Laird; 2005, ‘Naïve deontics: A theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning’, Cognitive Psychology 50, 159-193. · DOI
  9. Burger, J. M.: 2009, ‘Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?’, American Psychologist 64, 1-11. · DOI
  10. Camerer, C. F. and D. Lovallo: 1999, `Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach', American Economic Review 89, 306–318 · DOI
  11. Campbell, A., J. Whitehead and S. Finkelstein: 2009, ‘Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions’, Harvard Business Review Feb, 60–66. · DOI
  12. Chugh, D., M. H. Bazerman, and M. R. Banaji: 2005, ‘Bounded Ethicality a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest’, in D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, and M. Bazerman (eds.), Conflicts of Interest (Cambridge University Press, London), pp. 74–95. · DOI
  13. Chugh, D. and M. Bazerman: 2007, ‘Bounded awareness: what you fail to see can hurt you’, Mind & Society 6, 1-18. · DOI
  14. Davidson, D.: 1974, ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 47, 5–20. · DOI
  15. Dreyfus, H. L. and S. E. Dreyfus: 1991, `Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise', Human Studies 14, 229–250 · DOI
  16. Elstein, A. S., L. S. Shulman and S. A. Sprafka: 1990, `Medical Problem Solving: A Ten-Year Retrospective', Evaluation and the Health Professions 13, 5–36 · DOI
  17. Ericsson, K. A. and N. Charness: 1994, `Expert Performance: Its Structure and Acquisition', American Psychologist 49(8), 725–747 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gentner, D. and E. W. Whitley: 1997, ‘Mental Models of Population Growth’, in M. Bazerman, A. E. Tenbrunsel and A. Wade-Benzoni (eds.), Environment, Ethics and Behavior (New Lexington Press, San Francisco), pp. 209-233.
  19. Gorman, M.: 1992, Simulating Science (Bloomington IN, Indiana University Press).
  20. Greene, J. D., R. Sommerville, L. E. Nystrom, J. M. Darley and J. D. Cohen: 2001, ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment’, Science 293, 2105–2108. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Haidt, J.: 2001, ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’, Psychological Review 108, 814–834. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Haidt, J.: 2008, ‘Morality’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 65–72. · DOI
  23. Haidt, J. and F. Bjorklund: 2008, ‘Social Intuitionists Reason, as a Normal Part of Conversation’, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
  24. Johnson, M.: 1993, Moral Imagination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago). · DOI
  25. Kahneman, D. and D. Lovallo: 1993, `Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking', Management Science 39(1), 17–31 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kets de Vries, M. and D. Miller: 1984, The Neurotic Organization (Jossey-Bass, San Fransicso).
  27. Klein, G.: 2004, The Power of Intuition (Currency, New York).
  28. Laible, D. L. and R. A. Thompson: 2000, ‘Mother-Child Discourse, Attachment Security, Shared Positive Affect, and Early Conscience Development’, Child Development 71(5), 1424–1440. · DOI
  29. Lapsley, D. K. and P. L. Hill: 2008, `On Dual Processing and Heuristic Approaches to Moral Cognition', Journal of Moral Education 37, 313–332 · DOI
  30. Mack, A. and I. Rock: 1998, Inattentional Blindness (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). · DOI
  31. Maloney, R.: 2001, ‘Authenticity and Contact with Youth’, Review for Religious 60, 262.
  32. Milgram, S.: 1974, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (Harper and Row, New York).
  33. Moberg, D. J.: 2006, ‘Ethics blind spots in organizations’, Organizational Studies 27 (3), 413-428. · DOI
  34. Narvaez, D.: 2008a, ‘Triune ethics: The neurobiological roots of our multiple moralities’, New Ideas in Psychology 26, 95-119. · DOI
  35. Narvaez, D.: 2008b, ‘Human flourishing and moral development: Cognitive science and neurobiological perspectives on virtue development’, in L. Nucci and D. Narvaez (eds.), Handbook of Moral and Character Education (Routledge, New York), pp. 310-327.
  36. Narvaez, D., D. K. Lapsley, S. Hagele and B. Laskey: 2006, ‘Moral chronicity and social information-processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to moral personality’, Journal of Research in Personality 40(6), 966-985. · DOI
  37. Naugle, D. K.: 2002, Worldview (Eerdmans Publishers, Grand Rapids MI).
  38. Neisser, U.:1979, ‘The Concept of Intelligence’, Intelligence 3, 217-227. · DOI
  39. Norman G, M. Young and L. Brooks: 2007, ‘Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: The role of experience’, Medical Education 41(12), 1140-1145.
  40. Packer, D. J.: 2008, ‘Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 301-304. · DOI
  41. Polanyi, M.: 1966, The tacit dimension (Basic Books, Garden City NY).
  42. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rorty, R.: 1993, ‘Putnam and the Relativist Menace’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 443-561. · DOI
  44. Rouse, W. B. and N. M. Morris: 1986, `On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models', Psychological Bulletin 100(3), 349–363 · DOI
  45. Simons, D. J. and D. T. Levin: 2003, `What Makes Change Blindness Interesting?', in D. E. Irwin and B. H. Ross (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 42 (Academic Press, San Diego, CA), pp. 295–322 · DOI
  46. Werhane, P. H.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making (Oxford University Press, New York).
  47. Werhane, P. H., S. Kelley, L. Hartman and D. Moberg: 2009, Profitable Partnerships for Poverty Alleviation (Routledge/Taylor and Francis, New York).
  48. Wojciszke, B., R. Bazinska and M. Jaworski.: 1998, ‘On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24, 1245–1257. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., Moberg, D., Englehardt, E., Pritchard, M., & Parmar, B.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Santa Clara University (US)
  • Utah Valley University (US)
  • Western Michigan University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Werhane, Patricia H.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-02-11
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
103-118
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-011-0767-3
OpenAlex
W2037990982
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
Milgram experiment, obedience to authority, moral imagination, mental models, social constructivism, ethical leadership, scientific authority, situational ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review