Cited by 643Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

MULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices

Open access
McGinnis, Christopher S., Patterson, David M., Winkler, Juliane, Conrad, Daniel N., Hein, Marco Y., Srivastava, Vasudha, Hu, Jennifer L., Murrow, Lyndsay M. +4 more·2019·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Sample multiplexing facilitates scRNA-seq by reducing costs and identifying artifacts such as cell doublets. However, universal and scalable sample barcoding strategies have not been described. We therefore developed MULTI-seq: multiplexing using lipid-tagged indices for single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing. MULTI-seq reagents can barcode any cell type or nucleus from any species with an accessible plasma membrane. The method involves minimal sample processing, thereby preserving cell viability and endogenous gene expression patterns. When cells are classified into sample groups using MULTI-seq barcode abundances, data quality is improved through doublet identification and recovery of cells with low RNA content that would otherwise be discarded by standard quality-control workflows. We use MULTI-seq to track the dynamics of T-cell activation, perform a 96-plex perturbation experiment with primary human mammary epithelial cells and multiplex cryopreserved tumors and metastatic sites isolated from a patient-derived xenograft mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-019-0433-8

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample multiplexed scRNA-seq is an efficient method for massively parallel species-mixing experiments.

    “Sample multiplexed scRNA-seq is another solution, establishing an efficient method for massively parallel species-mixing experiments [18–22].”

    From Single-cell sequencing to multi-omics: technologies and applications (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results section on demultiplexing reports species-specific classification of mixed human and mouse nuclei. The Results section on doublets demonstrates efficient, large-scale multiplexing of 96 human mammary epithelial cell samples, but our copy does not demonstrate a massively parallel species-mixing experiment; the claim combines features shown in separate experiments. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGinnis, C. S., Patterson, D. M., Winkler, J., Conrad, D. N., Hein, M. Y., Srivastava, V., Hu, J. L., Murrow, L. M., Weissman, J. S., Werb, Z., Chow, E. D., & Gartner, Z. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chow, Eric D.
  • Gartner, Zev J.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2019-06-17
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
619-626
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2951068818
Cited by
643
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1330864, 1548297)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH1011023, W81XWH, W81XWH1310221, W81XWH-13)
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-2239-15)
  • National Institutes of Health (DBI-1548297, 1s10od021822-01, W81XWH, UL1TR001872)
  • University of California, San Francisco (DBI-1548297)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA199315)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007810, F32GM128366)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (DP2HD080351)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sample multiplexing, single-cell RNA sequencing, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, T cell activation, mammary epithelial cells, metastatic sites, triple-negative breast cancer, patient-derived xenografts
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Humans, Lipids, Sequence Analysis, RNA, HEK293 Cells, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review