Cited by 26Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

US Population Eligibility and Estimated Impact of Semaglutide Treatment on Obesity Prevalence and Cardiovascular Disease Events

Open access
Wong, Nathan D., Karthikeyan, Hridhay, Fan, Wenjun·2025·Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Abstract

Background: Semaglutide 2.4 mg benefits weight loss and reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adults with obesity. We estimated the US population eligibility for semaglutide 2.4 mg (based on the weight management indication) and the impact on obesity and CVD events. Methods: We applied STEP 1 trial eligibility criteria to US adults aged ≥ 18 years in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2018 to estimate the US eligible population. Semaglutide weight changes in STEP 1 were applied to estimate the population impact on weight changes and obesity prevalence. We also estimated 10-year CVD risks utilizing the BMI-based Framingham CVD risk scores. The difference in estimated risks with and without semaglutide “treatment” multiplied by the eligible NHANES weighted population represented the estimated “preventable” CVD events. Results: We identified 3999 US adults weighted to an estimated population size of 93.0 million [M] (38% of US adults) who fit STEP 1 eligibility criteria. Applying STEP 1 treatment effects on weight loss resulted in an estimated 69.1% (64.3 M) and 50.5% (47.0 M) showing ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% weight reductions, respectively, translating to a 46.1% (43.0 M) reduction in obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2) prevalence. Among those without CVD, estimated 10-year CVD risks were 10.15% “before” and 8.34% “after” semaglutide “treatment” reflecting a 1.81% absolute (and 17.8% relative) risk reduction translating to 1.50 million preventable CVD events over 10 years. Conclusion: Semaglutide treatment in eligible US adults may substantially reduce obesity prevalence and CVD events, which may dramatically impact associated healthcare costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10557-023-07488-3

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, N. D., Karthikeyan, H., & Fan, W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Wong, Nathan D.
Venue
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Published
2023-08-14
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
75-84
ISSN
  • 0920-3206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7241
OpenAlex
W4385798876
Cited by
26
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
semaglutide, obesity, cardiovascular disease, weight loss, obesity prevalence, cardiovascular risk reduction, GLP-1 receptor agonists, NHANES, Framingham risk score, health care costs
MeSH terms
Heart Disease Risk Factors, Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Eligibility Determination, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, United States, Weight Loss, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Anti-Obesity Agents, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review