Population‐level impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg in patients with obesity or overweight and cardiovascular disease: A modelling study based on the SELECT trial
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To estimate the impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults with overweight/obesity in the United States based on the SELECT trial of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods: Using 2023 census projections and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, we developed Markov population‐based predictive models for US adults meeting SELECT inclusion criteria and, separately, for adults eligible for semaglutide 2.4 mg for its MACE risk reduction indication. The 10‐year rate of recurrent MACE and deaths was estimated based on the Secondary Manifestations of ARTerial disease 2 risk calculator and estimated semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment effect as per the SELECT MACE hazard ratio. Results: Of 6 164 019 US adults meeting the SELECT criteria, 2 523 218 (40.9%) are estimated to have ≥1 new MACE in the next 10 years with no additional intervention. Semaglutide 2.4 mg may prevent 496 400 events, a 16% relative reduction. An estimated 2 103 630 deaths are predicted over the next 10 years, of which 332 597 deaths (any cause, 16% relative reduction) could be avoided with semaglutide 2.4 mg. Among the estimated 22 653 158 meeting the MACE risk reduction FDA label criteria, 42.7% could experience ≥1 new MACE; treatment could prevent 1 934 493 MACE and 1 231 295 deaths (16% relative reduction for both). Conclusion: Four in 10 individuals in the United States meeting the SELECT criteria are estimated to experience a recurrent CV event without additional intervention. Semaglutide 2.4 mg can potentially prevent between half a million and up to 2 million MACE over the next 10 years in the population meeting SELECT and MACE risk reduction eligibility. Plain Language Summary: What is the context and purpose of this research study? More than 7 in 10 US adults have overweight or obesity, which increases the risk of heart disease. Semaglutide is a medication used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity. A clinical study called SELECT found that semaglutide reduces the risk of heart attack, stroke, or death by 20% in adults with overweight or obesity and heart disease. What was done? Our research estimated how many people in the United States would meet the criteria for participation in SELECT, how many heart disease events they might have with regular medical care over the next 10 years, and how many could be avoided with semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment in addition to regular medical care. We also estimated how many people would still be alive if they were treated with semaglutide. We estimated the same information for all people eligible for treatment with semaglutide based on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indication of semaglutide 2.4 mg in patients with heart disease. These estimations were based on a large survey of US adults. What were the main results? We found that over 6 million people would meet the SELECT study criteria. Of these, 41% are estimated to have at least 1 new heart disease event in the next 10 years. If treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg, nearly 500 000 heart disease events and more than 300 000 deaths could be avoided. More than 22 million adults would qualify for semaglutide 2.4 mg, according to the FDA indication. If all of these people were treated with semaglutide 2.4 mg, nearly 2 million heart disease events and more than 1 million deaths might be prevented. What is the originality and relevance of this study? Treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg can reduce the risk of new heart disease events and death in patients with existing heart disease, showing a substantial impact of semaglutide treatment in a real‐world setting in the United States. Our study used different analyses to add to the existing research about reducing the risk of heart disease in people with overweight or obesity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data to understand long-term health benefits, such as CVD risk reduction, in patients with obesity are limited.
“While studies have reported beneficial effects in cardiovascular outcomes in populations with T2D,19–23 data to understand the long-term health benefits, such as CVD risk reduction, in patients with obesity are limited.24,25”
From Tirzepatide compared with semaglutide and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk reduction in obesity: <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of the SURMOUNT-5 trial (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Marso, S. P., Bain, S. C., Consoli, A., Eliaschewitz, F. G., Jódar, E., Leiter, L. A., Lingvay, I., Rosenstock, J., Seufert, J., Warren, M. L., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1607141 · Cited by 6,900 · see citing works
Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes
Lincoff, A. M., Brown-Frandsen, K., Colhoun, H. M., Deanfield, J., Emerson, S. S., Esbjerg, S., Hardt-Lindberg, S., Hovingh, G. K., Kahn, S. E., Kushner, R. F., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2307563 · Cited by 3,236 · see citing works
Bray, G. A., Kim, K. K., Wilding, J. P. H., & on behalf of the World Obesity Federation (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12551 · Cited by 1,612 · see citing works
Khan, S. S., Ning, H., Wilkins, J. T., Allen, N., Carnethon, M., Berry, J. D., Sweis, R. N., & Lloyd-Jones, D. M. (2018) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0022 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i>
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s009 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Laddu, D., Neeland, I. J., Carnethon, M., Stanford, F. C., Mongraw-Chaffin, M., Barone Gibbs, B., Ndumele, C. E., Longenecker, C. T., Chung, M. L., Rao, G., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001221 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“13,14 However, the potential population-level impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg in the United States remains unknown.”
InfluentialPrevalence of SGLT2i and GLP1RA use among US adults with type 2 diabetes
Limonte, C. P., Hall, Y. N., Trikudanathan, S., Tuttle, K. R., Hirsch, I. B., de Boer, I. H., & Zelnick, L. R. (2022) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108204 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Semaglutide Eligibility Across All Current Indications for US Adults
Shi, I., Khan, S. S., Yeh, R. W., Ho, J. E., Dahabreh, I. J., & Kazi, D. S. (2025) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4657 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Wong, N. D., Karthikeyan, H., & Fan, W. (2025) · Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10557-023-07488-3 · Cited by 26 · cited 2× · see citing works
“19 In this analysis, we aimed to estimate the potential population-level impact of semaglutide 2.4 mg in the United States.”
InfluentialCardiovascular event reduction among a US population eligible for semaglutide per the SELECT trial
Lusk, J. B., Glover, L., Soneji, S., Granger, C. B., O'Brien, E., & Pagidipati, N. (2024) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.007 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- [1]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 Prepandemic Data Files Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes. Journal Issue. National Health Statistics Reports. 2021;NHSR No. 158. PMC11513744 39380201
- [3]Sbraccia P, Dicker D. Obesity is a chronic progressive relapsing disease of particular interest for internal medicine. Intern Emerg Med. 2023; 18(1): 1‐ 5. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03129-z 36273046 · DOI
- [4]Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, et al. Projected U.S. state‐level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(25): 2440‐ 2450. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1909301 31851800 · DOI · Paper page
- [6]Afshin A, Forouzanfar M, Reitisma M, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(1): 13‐ 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 28604169 PMC5477817 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss. Circulation. 2006; 113(6): 898‐ 918. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.171016 16380542 · DOI · Paper page
- [9]Raisi‐Estabragh Z, Kobo O, Mieres JH, et al. Racial disparities in obesity‐related cardiovascular mortality in the United States: temporal trends from 1999 to 2020. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(18): e028409. doi: 10.1161/jaha.122.028409 37671611 PMC10547286 · DOI
- [10]Garvey WT, Batterham RL, Bhatta M, et al. Two‐year effects of semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 5 trial. Nat Med. 2022; 28(10): 2083‐ 2091. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02026-4 36216945 PMC9556320 · DOI · Paper page
- [11]Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021; 325(14): 1414‐ 1425. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.3224 33755728 PMC7988425 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Erhabor J, Khorsandi M, Blaha MJ. National and state estimates of SELECT trial eligibility and its public health impact in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7): e2420105. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20105 38958980 PMC11222994 · DOI
- [17]Lu Y, Liu Y, Jastreboff AM, et al. Eligibility for cardiovascular risk reduction therapy in the United States based on SELECT trial criteria: insights from the National Health and nutrition examination survey. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024; 17(1): e010640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010640 37950677 PMC10782930 · DOI
- [22]Duval S, Massaro JM, Jaff MR, et al. An evidence‐based score to detect prevalent peripheral artery disease (PAD). Vasc Med. 2012; 17(5): 342‐ 351. doi: 10.1177/1358863X12445102 22711750 · DOI
- [24]Hageman SHJ, McKay AJ, Ueda P, et al. Estimation of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular event risk in patients with established cardiovascular disease: the updated SMART2 algorithm. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43(18): 1715‐ 1727. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac056 35165703 PMC9312860 · DOI
- [25]Delgado C, Baweja M, Burrows NR, et al. Reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney diseases: an interim report from the NKF‐ASN task force. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32(6): 1305‐ 1317. 33837122 PMC8259639
- [26]Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Mak. 1993; 13(4): 322‐ 338. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300409 8246705 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998; 13(4): 397‐ 409. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813040-00003 10178664 · DOI
- [28]Gaziano L, Cho K, Djousse L, et al. Risk factors and prediction models for incident heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8(6): 4893‐ 4903. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13429 34528757 PMC8712836 · DOI
- [29]Arias E, Xu J. National Vital Statistics Report. United States life tables, 2020. NCHS National Vital Statistics Reports. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/118055 35947823
- [30]Siniawski D, Masson G, Masson W, et al. Residual cardiovascular risk, use of standard care treatments, and achievement of treatment goals in patients with cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023; 18: 200198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200198 37521245 PMC10374461 · DOI
- [32]Diallo A, Carlos‐Bolumbu M, Galtier F. Age, sex, race, BMI, and duration of diabetes differences in cardiovascular outcomes with glucose lowering drugs in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. eClinMed. 2022; 54: 101697. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101697 PMC9574412 36263397 · DOI
- [35]Jacobs JA, Zheutlin AR, Derington CG, King JB, Pandey A, Bress AP. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist and sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use among adults with diabetes mellitus by cardiovascular‐kidney disease risk: National Health and nutrition examination surveys, 2015–2020. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024; 17: 100624. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100624 38125205 PMC10730337 · DOI
- [36]Nanna MG, Kolkailah AA, Page C, Peterson ED, Navar AM. Use of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagonlike peptide‐1 receptor agonists in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease in community practice. JAMA Cardiol. 2023; 8(1): 89‐ 95. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3839 36322056 PMC9631221 · DOI
- [39]Chaitoff A, Bendicksen L, Feldman WB, Zheutlin AR, Lalani HS. Estimating new eligibility and maximum costs of expanded medicare coverage of semaglutide for cardiovascular risk prevention. Ann Intern Med. 2024; 177(10): 1440‐ 1442. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00308 39186788 · DOI
- [41]McEwan P, Bøg M, Faurby M, et al. EE497 the cost‐effectiveness of semaglutide 2.4mg in patients with overweight/obesity and cardiovascular disease from the SELECT trial. Value Health. 2024; 27(6): S148. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.2261 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mamas, M. A., Bays, H., Li, R., Upadhyay, N., Irani, T., Senyucel, C., Dunn, J. P., & Liu-Seifert, H. (2025) · European Heart Journal Open · doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nanna, M. G., Doan, Q. V., Fabricatore, A., Faurby, M., Henry, A. D., Houshmand‐Oeregaard, A., Levine, A., Navar, A. M., Scassellati Sforzolini, T., & Toliver, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Genesis Research Group Hoboken New Jersey USA
- Novo Nordisk (United States) (US)
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Population and Data Sciences UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
- Corresponding author
- Nanna, Michael G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3442-3452
- ISSN
- 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1326
- PMC
- PMC12046440
- OpenAlex
- W4409182956
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- obesity, overweight, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, major adverse cardiovascular events, population effects, cardiovascular risk reduction, SELECT trial, Markov model, cardiovascular mortality, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, United States adults, cardiovascular risk calculators, obesity prevention
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Markov Chains, Middle Aged, Obesity, United States, Overweight, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review