CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 266Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 170 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 2—Application to Peer Group Processes and Future Directions for Research

Open access
Nesi, Jacqueline, Choukas-Bradley, Sophia, Prinstein, Mitchell J.·2018·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
DOI 10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9PMC PMC6402323
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As social media use becomes increasingly widespread among adolescents, research in this area has accumulated rapidly. Researchers have shown a growing interest in the impact of social media on adolescents' peer experiences, including the ways that the social media context shapes a variety of peer relations constructs. This paper represents Part 2 of a two-part theoretical review. In this review, we offer a new model for understanding the transformative role of social media in adolescents' peer experiences, with the goal of stimulating future empirical work that is grounded in theory. The transformation framework suggests that the features of the social media context transform adolescents' peer experiences by changing their frequency or immediacy, amplifying demands, altering their qualitative nature, and/or offering new opportunities for compensatory or novel behaviors. In the current paper, we consider the ways that social media may transform peer relations constructs that often occur at the group level. Our review focuses on three key constructs: peer victimization, peer status, and peer influence. We selectively review and highlight existing evidence for the transformation of these domains through social media. In addition, we discuss methodological considerations and key conceptual principles for future work. The current framework offers a new theoretical perspective through which peer relations researchers may consider adolescent social media use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 170 references

4 of the 170 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011a). The drama! Teen conflict, gossip, and bullying in networked publics. In A Decade in Internet time: Symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society, Oxford, UK.
  2. Moreno, M., & Kota, R. (2013). Social media. In V. C. Strasburger, B. Wilson, & A. B. (Beth) Jordan (Eds.), Children, adolescents, and the media (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100025421490.0x000001 . Accessed 27 May 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 266

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Nesi, Jacqueline
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-04-07
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
295-319
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
DOI
10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9
PMC
PMC6402323
OpenAlex
W2796205913
Cited by
266
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DGE-1144081)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH85505)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD055342)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media use, peer victimization, peer status, peer influence, transformation framework, theoretical model, methodological considerations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Peer Group, Friends, Bullying, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review