The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“projections for the number of wildfire events by the end the century vary dramatically (e.g., +9 to 13% [11], +40 to 49% [14], and +34 to 53% [12]).”
From Incorporating Anthropogenic Influences into Fire Probability Models: Effects of Human Activity and Climate Change on Fire Activity in California (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Our finding of a moderate increases in the number of fires in the two forecast periods evaluated (2001–2025, 2026–2050) are in agreement with Lenihan et al [11], who use dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) to forecast relatively small increases (on the order of 4–7%) to burned area but with broad shifts in fire regime and plant community patterns.”
From Incorporating Anthropogenic Influences into Fire Probability Models: Effects of Human Activity and Climate Change on Fire Activity in California (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Special report on emissions scenarios
Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J. M., Davis, G. F., de Vries, B. J. M., Fenhann, J. V., Gaffin, S. R., Gregory, K., Griibler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., et al. (2000) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3,423
Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere
Oren, R., Ellsworth, D. S., Johnsen, K. H., Phillips, N., Ewers, B. E., Maier, C., Schäfer, K. V. R., McCarthy, H., Hendrey, G., McNulty, S. G., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35078064 · Cited by 1,084
Forest response to elevated CO 2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity
Norby, R. J., DeLucia, E. H., Gielen, B., Calfapietra, C., Giardina, C. P., King, J. S., Childs, J., McCarthy, H. R., MOORE, D. J. P., Ceulemans, R., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509478102 · Cited by 990
Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California
Hayhoe, K., Cayan, D. R., Field, C. B., Frumhoff, P. C., Maurer, E. P., Miller, N. L., Moser, S. C., Schneider, S. H., Nicholas, K. A., Cleland, E. E., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0404500101 · Cited by 865
Self-citationParton, W. J., Ojima, D. S., Cole, C. V., & SCHIMEL, D. S. (1994) · SSSA special publication series · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub39.c9 · Cited by 636
Landscape dynamics in crown fire ecosystems
Turner, M. G., & Romme, W. H. (1994) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00135079 · Cited by 609
Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO 2
Körner, C., Asshoff, R., Bignucolo, O., Hättenschwiler, S., Keel, S. G., Pelaez‐Riedl, S., Pépin, S., SIEGWOLF, R. T. W., & Zotz, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113977 · Cited by 557
Contributions of Land-Use History to Carbon Accumulation in U.S. Forests
Caspersen, J. P., Pacala, S. W., Jenkins, J. C., HURTT, G. C., Moorcroft, P. R., & Birdsey, R. A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1148 · Cited by 508
Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO 2 and global warming in a multi‐factor world
Norby, R. J., & Luo, Y. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01047.x · Cited by 450
Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States
Bachelet, D., Neilson, R. P., Lenihan, J. M., & Drapek, R. J. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0002-7 · Cited by 392
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Davis FW, Stoms DM, Hollander AD, Thomas KA, Stine PA, Odion D, Borchert MI, Thorne JH, Gray MV, Walker RE, Warner K, Graae J (1998) The California Gap Analysis Project, Final Report. University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
- Kattenberg A, Giorgi F, Grassl H, Meehl G, Mitchell J, Stouffer R, Tokioka T, Weaver A, Wigley T (1996) Climate models: projections of future climate. In: Houghton JL, Filho M, Callander B, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Contribution to Working Group 1 to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 285–357
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–217 of 217
Bringing MC1 Model Results to Data Basin to Facilitate Access, Distribution, and Interpretation
Bachelet, D., & the CBI Data Basin team (2015) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1002/9781119011705.ch11
Self-citationGlobal change and fir e regimes in Australia
Cary, J. R., Bradstock, R. A., & Gill, A. M. (2012)
Effects of snowpack on avian abundance and species richness in Sierra Nevada forests
Stuart, T. H. (2016) · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University)
Climate Change on the Forests of the Klamath-Siskiyous and Potential Management Strategies.
Maxwell, C. J. (2018) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)
Appendix Publications and Reports Featuring MC1
(2015) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1002/9781119011705.app1
Will thinning and fuel reduction treatments help dry conifer forests persist under climate change?
Hanbury‐Brown, A. R., Holm, J. A., Tortorelli, C. M., Young, D. J. N., Gao, X., Koven, C. D., Knox, R., Kueppers, L. M., & Latimer, A. M. (2025) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/aded5b · Cited by 2
(2012) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9780643104839.part02
Xu, K., Wang, X., Jiang, C., & Jianxin, S. O. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12153837
Safford, H. D., & Stewart, J. A. E. (2026) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2026.1764379 · Cited by 1
González, P., & Verkerke, J. L. (2026) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ae89cf
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., & Buluç, L. Y. (2026) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-281
Friesen, R. E., & Grossenbacher, D. L. (2026) · Madroño · doi:10.3120/0024-9637-260023
Variation in anthropogenic tolerance alters dispersal capacity of a large carnivore
Hansen, K. W., Morgan, J. J., de Alfaro, L., Wilmers, C. C., Nájera, F., & Ocampo‐Peñuela, N. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57851-1
Carlson, C. H. (2011) · The Mathematics Enthusiast
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenihan, J. M., Bachelet, D., Neilson, R. P., & Drapek, R.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lenihan, James M.
- Venue
- Climatic Change
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 215-230
- ISSN
- 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1480
- OpenAlex
- W2040144539
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Climatic Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- climate change scenarios, vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, forest fires, carbon sink, net primary productivity, grassland expansion, biomass consumption, California, climate change projections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
