Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial: An editorial comment

Open access
Shine, Keith P.·2009·Climatic Change

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Bradford DF (2001) Time, money and tradeoffs. Nature 410:649–650 · DOI
  2. Fisher DA, Hales CH, Wang WC, Ko MKW, Sze ND (1990) Model calculations of the relative effects of CFCs and their replacements on global warming. Nature 344:513–516 · DOI
  3. Fuglestvedt JS, Berntsen TK, Godal O, Sausen R, Shine KP, Skodvin T (2003) Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices. Clim Change 58:267–331 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Godal O (2003) The IPCC’s assessment of multidisciplinary issues: the case of greenhouse gas indices. An editorial essay. Clim Change 58:243–249 · DOI
  5. IPCC (1990) Climate change: the intergovernmental panel on climate change scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  6. Johansson DJA, Persson UM, Azar C (2006) The cost of using global warming potentials: analyzing the trade off between CO2, CH4 and N2O. Clim Change 77:291–309 · DOI
  7. Johansson DJA, Persson UM, Azar C (2008) Uncertainty and learning: implications for the trade-off between short-lived and long-lived greenhouse gases. Clim Change 88:293–308 · DOI
  8. Lashof DA, Ahuja DR (1990) Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344:529–531 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Manne AS, Richels RG (2001) An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature 410:675–677 · DOI
  10. O’Neill BC (2000) The jury is still out on global warming potentials. Clim Change 44:427–443 · DOI
  11. O’Neill BC (2003) Economics, natural science, and the costs of global warming potentials—an editorial comment. Clim Change 58:251–260 · DOI
  12. Rogers JD, Stephens RD (1988) Absolute infrared intensities for F-113 and F-114 and an assessment of their greenhouse warming potential relative to other chlorofluorocarbons. J Geophys Res 93:2423–2428 · DOI
  13. Rotmans J, Den Elzen MGJ (1992) A model-based approach to the calculation of global warming potentials (GWPs). Int J Climatol 12:865–874 · DOI
  14. Shackley S, Wynne B (1997) Global warming potentials: ambiguity or precision as an aid to policy. Clim Res 8:89–106 · DOI
  15. Sherwood S (2007) Discounting and uncertainty: a non-economist’s view. Clim Change 80:205–212 · DOI
  16. Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N (2005) Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Change 68:281–302 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Shine KP, Berntsen TK, Fuglestvedt JS, Bieltvedt Skeie R, Stuber N (2007) Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents. Philos Trans R Soc, A 365:1903–1914 · DOI
  18. Skodvin T, Fuglestvedt JS (1997) A comprehensive approach to climate change: political and scientific considerations. Ambio 26:351–358
  19. Smith SJ (2003) The evaluation of greenhouse gas indices—an editorial comment. Clim Change 58:261–265 · DOI
  20. Tanaka K, O’Neill BC, Rokityanskiy D, Obersteiner M, Tol RSJ (2009) Evaluating global warming potentials with historical temperature. Clim Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9566-6 · DOI
  21. van Vuuren DP, Weyant J, de la Chesnaye F (2006) Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing. Energy Econ 28:102–120 · DOI

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Shine, K. P.
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2009-08-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
467-472
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2159370940
Cited by
256
References
1
FWCI
27.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial: An editorial comment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6
The paper
Shine, K. P. (2009). The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial: An editorial comment. Climatic Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.