Cited by 50Climate Change Policy and EconomicsIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Early action on Paris Agreement allows for more time to change energy systems

Open access
van Soest, Heleen L., de Boer, Harmen Sytze, Roelfsema, Mark, den Elzen, Michel G.J., Admiraal, Annemiek, van Vuuren, Detlef P., Hof, Andries F., van den Berg, Maarten +3 more·2017·Climatic Change

Abstract

The IMAGE integrated assessment model was used to develop a set of scenarios to evaluate the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) submitted by Parties under the Paris Agreement. The scenarios project emissions and energy system changes under (i) current policies, (ii) implementation of the NDCs, and (iii) various trajectories to a radiative forcing level of 2.8 W/m 2 in 2100, which gives a probability of about two thirds to limit warming to below 2 °C. The scenarios show that a cost-optimal pathway from 2020 onwards towards 2.8 W/m 2 leads to a global greenhouse gas emission level of 38 gigatonne CO 2 equivalent (GtCO 2 eq) by 2030, equal to a reduction of 20% compared to the 2010 level. The NDCs are projected to lead to 2030 emission levels of 50 GtCO 2 eq, which is still an increase compared to the 2010 level. A scenario that achieves the 2.8 W/m 2 forcing level in 2100 from the 2030 NDC level requires more rapid transitions after 2030 to meet the forcing target. It shows an annual reduction rate in greenhouse gas emissions of 4.7% between 2030 and 2050, rapidly phasing out unabated coal-fired power plant capacity, more rapid scale-up of low-carbon energy, and higher mitigation costs. A bridge scenario shows that enhancing the ambition level of NDCs before 2030 allows for a smoother energy system transition, with average annual emission reduction rates of 4.5% between 2030 and 2050, and more time to phase out coal capacity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10584-017-2027-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kriegler E, Tavoni M, Aboumahboub T, et al. (2013a) Can we still meet 2°C with global climate action? The LIMITS study on implications of Durban Action Platform scenarios. Clim. Chang. Econ. (in press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Soest, H. L., de Boer, H. S., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M. G. J., Admiraal, A., van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., van den Berg, M., Harmsen, M. J. H. M., Gernaat, D. E. H. J., & Forsell, N.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
Venue
Climatic Change
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
144
Issue
2
Pages
165-179
ISSN
  • 0165-0009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1480
OpenAlex
W2738459632
Cited by
50
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climatic Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Utrecht University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
Paris Agreement, Nationally Determined Contributions, climate change mitigation, greenhouse gas emissions, energy transition, radiative forcing, 2 °C warming limit, coal phase-out, low-carbon energy, mitigation costs, emission scenarios

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review