Cited by 36Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Suicide loss survivors′ experiences with therapy: Implications for clinical practice

Sanford, Rebecca, Cerel, Julie, McGann, Vanessa, Maple, Myfanwy·2016·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Over two-thirds of suicide loss survivors, those who have lost a loved one to suicide, seek individual therapy following their loss. However, nothing is known about what survivors find helpful about therapy or how therapy impacts their grief. An online survey was conducted June 2012-March 2013 with a convenience sample of 197 survivors primarily from the USA and Australia to develop a better understanding of treatment seeking loss survivors and their experiences in therapy. Questions explored the experience of the suicide death, the therapy received after the loss, and insights about improving therapy for loss survivors. Participants were generally positive about their therapy experiences. However, respondents endorsed symptoms of PTSD, though many did not report a formal diagnosis from a provider, suggesting a discrepancy that could lead to inadequate treatment of symptoms. The findings provide an understanding of treatment seeking loss survivors, along with implications for therapists treating this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-016-0006-6

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a tension between the need for psychosocial services for people bereaved by suicide and what is known about their effectiveness.

    “Overall, there is a tension between the need for psychosocial services for people bereaved by suicide (Sanford et al., 2016; Pitman et al., 2018) and what is known about their effectiveness (McDaid et al., 2008; Szumilas and Kutcher, 2011; Linde et al., 2017).”

    From Suicide Postvention Service Models and Guidelines 2014–2019: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Sanford et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanford, R., Cerel, J., McGann, V., & Maple, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
Sanford, Rebecca
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2016-04-13
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
551-558
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2338418086
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
suicide loss survivors, grief, individual psychotherapy, treatment experience, treatment seeking, post-traumatic stress disorder, posttraumatic stress symptoms, clinical practice implications
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bereavement, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Suicide, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Survivors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review