Cited by 108Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Interventions for people bereaved through suicide: systematic review

Open access
McDaid, Catriona, Trowman, Rebecca, Golder, Su, Hawton, Keith, Sowden, Amanda·2008·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Promoting the mental health of people bereaved through suicide is a key aim of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of interventions to support people bereaved through suicide. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review of data from controlled studies of interventions for people bereaved through suicide. Studies were identified using systematic searches, the methodological quality of included studies was assessed and narrative synthesis conducted. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified. None was UK-based and all but one study had substantial methodological limitations. When compared with no intervention, there was evidence of some benefit from single studies of a cognitive-behavioural family intervention of four sessions with a psychiatric nurse; a psychologist-led 10-week bereavement group intervention for children; and 8-week group therapy for adults delivered by a mental health professional and volunteer. The findings from studies comparing two or more active interventions were more equivocal. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is evidence of some benefit from interventions for people bereaved by suicide, this is not robust. Further methodologically sound evidence is required to confirm whether interventions are helpful and, if so, for whom.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040824

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suicide prevention strategies in many high-income countries recommend provision of support for people bereaved by suicide, in view of their suicide risk, but lack an evidence base for intervening.

    “Suicide prevention strategies in many high-income countries recommend providision of support for people bereaved by suicide, in view of their suicide risk (Pitman et al., 2014), but lack an evidence base for intervening (McDaid et al., 2008).”

    From The stigma associated with bereavement by suicide and other sudden deaths: A qualitative interview study (2018) · cites this paper as McDaid et al., 2008

    The McDaid citation is attached to the claim about the evidence base for intervention, not the preceding claim about national strategies or suicide risk. The Conclusions say evidence of some benefit exists but is not robust and further research is needed. Thus the paper supports a lack of a robust evidence base, not an absence of evidence altogether. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intervention evidence suggests potential benefits of group-based and psychosocial approaches for some suicide-bereaved individuals, while the overall evidence base remains heterogeneous and methodologically uneven.

    “This dovetails with intervention evidence suggesting potential benefits of group-based and psychosocial approaches for some suicide-bereaved individuals, while also highlighting that the overall evidence base remains heterogeneous and methodologically uneven (Linde et al., 2017;McDaid et al., 2008).”
  • Little is known about the effectiveness of postvention.

    “While little is known of the effectiveness of postvention, this review aimed to investigate what is known of the effects of postvention service delivery models and the components that may contribute to the effectiveness.”

    From Suicide Postvention Service Models and Guidelines 2014–2019: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as McDaid et al., 2008

  • There is a tension between the need for psychosocial services for people bereaved by suicide and what is known about their effectiveness.

    “Overall, there is a tension between the need for psychosocial services for people bereaved by suicide (Sanford et al., 2016; Pitman et al., 2018) and what is known about their effectiveness (McDaid et al., 2008; Szumilas and Kutcher, 2011; Linde et al., 2017).”

    From Suicide Postvention Service Models and Guidelines 2014–2019: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as McDaid et al., 2008

  • Little is known about the effectiveness of suicide bereavement support.

    “However, little is known about its effectiveness.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Seguin M, Vinet-Bonin A, Senecal I. Evaluation de programmes de postvention [Evaluation of four suicide bereavement programs]. Rev Fr Psychiat Psychol Med 2004; 8: 17-24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDaid, C., Trowman, R., Golder, S., Hawton, K., & Sowden, A.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
McDaid, Catriona
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2008-12
Volume
193
Issue
6
Pages
438-443
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W1966368779
Cited by
107
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
suicide bereavement, bereavement interventions, grief after suicide, family intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, mental health support
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Child, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Suicide, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review