Cited by 431Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons: A comprehensive quantitative review.

Currier, Joseph M., Neimeyer, Robert A., Berman, Jeffrey S.·2008·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Previous quantitative reviews of research on psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons have yielded divergent findings and have not included many of the available controlled outcome studies. This meta-analysis summarizes results from 61 controlled studies to offer a more comprehensive integration of this literature. This review examined (a) the absolute effectiveness of bereavement interventions immediately following intervention and at follow-up assessments, (b) several of the clinically and theoretically relevant moderators of outcome, and (c) change over time among recipients of the interventions and individuals in no-intervention control groups. Overall, analyses showed that interventions had a small effect at posttreatment but no statistically significant benefit at follow-up. However, interventions that exclusively targeted grievers displaying marked difficulties adapting to loss had outcomes that compare favorably with psychotherapies for other difficulties. Other evidence suggested that the discouraging results for studies failing to screen for indications of distress could be attributed to a tendency among controls to improve naturally over time. The findings of the review underscore the importance of attending to the targeted population in the practice and study of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.648

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bereavement interventions appear to be effective if aimed at high-risk groups or at those whose grieving process has already complicated.

    “Although bereavement interventions appear to be effective if aimed high-risk groups or at those whose grieving process has already complicated,57-59”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Reviews and meta-analyses of general bereavement interventions have shown that empirical evidence yields inconclusive results on their effectiveness.

    “Reviews and meta-analyses of general bereavement interventions have shown that although effectiveness of bereavement interventions is often assumed, empirical evidence yields inconclusive results.”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Currier, J. M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Berman, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2008-09
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
648-661
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1996791213
Cited by
431
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 32
FWCI
27.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
bereavement, grief, psychotherapeutic interventions, bereavement interventions, adaptation to loss, treatment effectiveness, follow-up outcomes, natural recovery
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Bereavement, Humans, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review