CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship Between Suicide Ideation, Behavioral Health, and College Academic Performance

De Luca, Susan M., Franklin, Cynthia, Yueqi, Yan, Johnson, Shannon, Brownson, Chris·2016·Community Mental Health Journal
DOI 10.1007/s10597-016-9987-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The impact of suicidal ideation on college students' academic performance has yet to be examined, yet mental health is often linked with academic performance. Underclassmen and upperclassmen were compared on behavioral health outcomes related to academic success (N = 26,457). Ideation (b = -0.05, p < .05), increased mental health (b = -0.03, p < .01) or substance use severity (b = -0.02, p < .01) was associated with lower GPAs. Underclassmen's behavioral health severity was related to lower GPA. Students reported higher GPAs when participating in extracurricular activities during the past year. Ideation, beyond mental health, is an important when assessing academic performance. Increasing students' connections benefits students experiencing behavioral concerns but also aids in suicide prevention initiatives and improves academic outcomes. Creating integrated health care systems on campus where physical, mental health and academic support services is crucial to offer solutions for students with severe or co-morbid mental health histories.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-016-9987-4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gold, L., & Albert, L. (2006). Graduation rates as a measure of college accountability. American Academic, 2(1), 89–106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Related

Metadata

Authors
De Luca, S. M., Franklin, C., Yueqi, Y., Johnson, S., & Brownson, C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
ORCID
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-01-29
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
534-540
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
DOI
10.1007/s10597-016-9987-4
OpenAlex
W2257158682
Cited by
166
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
suicidal ideation, university students, academic performance, GPA, behavioral health, substance use, mental health, extracurricular activities, suicide prevention, grade level differences
MeSH terms
Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Risk Factors, Student Health Services, Students, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review