Cited by 31Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

Sharpening our Understanding of the Consequences of Insomnia: The Relationship Between Insomnia and Everyday Cognitive Failures

Wilkerson, Allison, Boals, Adriel, Taylor, Daniel J.·2012·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-011-9418-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkerson, A., Boals, A., & Taylor, D. J.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Daniel J.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2011-11-17
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
134-139
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2008155255
Cited by
31
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
insomnia, cognitive failure, memory, distractibility, blunders, depression, negative affect, trait anxiety, stress, university students, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review