Cited by 40Corruption and Economic DevelopmentCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernancePublic Procurement and Policy

Corruption in public procurement: entrepreneurial coalition building

Hudon, Pierre-André, Garzón, César·2016·Crime, Law and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10611-016-9628-4

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudon, P.-A., & Garzón, C.
Affiliations
École Nationale d'Administration Publique (CA)
Corresponding author
Hudon, Pierre-André
Venue
Crime, Law and Social Change
Published
2016-08-13
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
291-311
ISSN
  • 0378-1100 (ISSN-L)
  • 0925-4994
  • 1573-0751
OpenAlex
W2518001757
Cited by
40
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Crime Law and Social Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (756-2014-0130)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
Keywords
corruption in procurement, public procurement, coalition building, network structure, benefit redistribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review