Cited by 15Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchEconomic and Technological InnovationEconomic Theory and Institutions

Searching NK Fitness Landscapes: On the Trade Off Between Speed and Quality in Complex Problem Solving

Geisendorf, Sylvie·2010·Computational Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10614-009-9192-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geisendorf, S.
Affiliations
University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Geisendorf, Sylvie
Venue
Computational Economics
Published
2009-11-18
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
395-406
ISSN
  • 0927-7099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9974
OpenAlex
W2004233970
Cited by
15
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computational Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
NK fitness landscapes, problem decomposition, modularity, innovation strategy, patent information, complex problem solving, search algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review