Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes
Abstract
A simple model is developed to explore the interrelationship between processes of organizational level change and population selection forces. A critical property of the model is that the effect on organizational fitness of the various attributes that constitute an organization's form is interactive. As a result of these interaction effects, the fitness landscape is “rugged.” An organization's form at founding has a persistent effect on its future form when there are multiple peaks in the fitness landscape, since the particular peak that an organization discovers is influenced by its starting position in the space of alternative organizational forms. Selection pressures influence the distribution of the organizational forms that emerge from the process of local adaptation. The ability of established organizations to respond to changing environments is importantly conditioned by the extent to which elements of organizational form interact in their effect on organizational fitness. Tightly coupled organizations are subject to high rates of failure in changing environments. Furthermore, successful “reorientations” are strongly associated with survival for tightly coupled organizations, but not for more loosely coupled organizations that are able to engage in effective local adaptation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The inertia problem can pertain not only to an organization's zero-order capabilities but to its dynamic capabilities as well, since routine-based organizational change tends to favor local adaptations.
“Importantly, it can pertain not only to an organization's zero-order capabilities but to its dynamic capabilities as well, since routine-based organizational change tends to favor local adaptations (Collis, 1994;Levinthal, 1997;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
From On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism (2014) · cites this paper as Levinthal, 1997
Especially when environmental dynamism is high and contextual change is fundamental and discontinuous, long-jump reorientations that require entirely novel solutions often prove more beneficial for a firm's competitive advantage than local adaptations from within the current set of available actions.
“Especially when environmental dynamism is high and contextual change is fundamental and discontinuous, long-jump reorientations that require entirely novel solutions often prove more beneficial for a firm's competitive advantage than local adaptations from within the current set of available actions”
From On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism (2014) · cites this paper as Levinthal, 1997
Cites
Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change
Levinthal, D. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.140 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737 · see citing works
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225 · see citing works
A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective
Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0093 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth
Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.807 · Cited by 1,341 · see citing works
A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise
Teece, D. J. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.54 · Cited by 1,300 · see citing works
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design
Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.290.12740 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation
Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.4.667 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24870 · Cited by 953 · see citing works
Self-citationKapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Collaborative learning in networks
Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110069108 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0042 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127016632758 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management: HEURISTICS IN MANAGEMENT
Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1950 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations
Mihm, J., Loch, C. H., Wilkinson, D., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias
Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0571 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Social learning strategies modify the effect of network structure on group performance
Barkoczi, D., & Galesic, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13109 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality
Felin, T., Kauffman, S., Koppl, R., & Longo, G. (2014) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1184 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12397 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
NK model as a representation of innovative search
Ganco, M. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Brunswicker, S., Almirall, E., & Majchrzak, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13561 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem Solving
Boussioux, L., N. Lane, J., Zhang, M., Jacimovic, V., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4533642 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Model of human collective decision-making in complex environments
Carbone, G., & Giannoccaro, I. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60609-0 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Geisendorf, S. (2010) · Computational Economics · doi:10.1007/s10614-009-9192-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Disruptive evolution: harnessing functional excess, experimentation, and science as tool
Felin, T., & Kauffman, S. (2023) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtad057 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Complexity and Organizational Communication
Poutanen, P., Siira, K., & Aula, P. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316639713 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study
Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1711743 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Levinthal, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levinthal, Daniel A.
- ORCID
- Levinthal, Daniel A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 934-950
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W1986904066
- Cited by
- 2,254
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 124 · 2012: 105
- FWCI
- 42.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- organizational forms, fitness landscape, rugged landscapes, local adaptation, organizational change, selection pressure, organizational fitness, interaction effects, loosely coupled organizations, organizational survival, reorientation, organizational failure, environmental change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review