Cited by 284Digital literacy in educationEducation and Digital TechnologiesLiteracy, Media, and Education

Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence

Krumsvik, Rune Johan·2008·Education and Information Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krumsvik, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Krumsvik, Rune Johan
Venue
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2008-09-24
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
279-290
ISSN
  • 1360-2357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7608
OpenAlex
W2060378812
Cited by
284
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Education and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education and Digital Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
situated learning, digital competence of teachers, digital literacy, ICT in education, competence model, teacher perceptions, computer literacy, media literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review